World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
4806
World Ranking
9205
National Ranking
770

Carsten Eulitz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carsten Eulitz sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 78 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Carsten Eulitz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carsten Eulitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carsten Eulitz is affiliated with the University of Konstanz in Germany. Their research spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with particular focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology. Additional subfields include Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, and Social Psychology.

Their main topics of study cover Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Language, Metaphor, and Cognition, Language Development and Disorders, linguistics and terminology studies, Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity, Reading and Literacy Development, and Neural dynamics and brain function.

Frequent coauthors in their work include Anna Czypionka, Mariya Kharaman, Eva Smolka, Molly J. Henry, and Jonas Obleser.

Carsten Eulitz's publication record features papers in various academic venues, including:

  • KOPS (University of Konstanz)
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Glossa Psycholinguistics
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • PLoS ONE

Notable recent publications by Carsten Eulitz comprise:

  • "Can you reach for the planets or grasp at the stars? - Modified noun, verb, or preposition constituents in idiom processing" (2020), KOPS (University of Konstanz)
  • "Wolf-hound vs. sled-dog: neurolinguistic evidence for semantic decomposition in the recognition of German noun-noun compounds" (2023), Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain activity reflect a complex interplay of syntactic, semantic and pragmatic information during the processing of German discourse particles" (2025), Glossa Psycholinguistics
  • "How strong is the rhythm of perception? A registered replication of Hickok et al. (2015)" (2025), Royal Society Open Science
  • "Processing at-issue and non-at-issue content: Evoked and induced brain activities reveal early and long-lasting differences" (2025), PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings.

    Christo Pantev;Olivier Bertrand;Carsten Eulitz;Chantal Verkindt

  • Neurobiological Evidence for Abstract Phonological Representations in the Mental Lexicon during Speech Recognition

    Carsten Eulitz;Aditi Lahiri

  • Neural signatures of semantic and phonemic fluency in young and old adults

    Marcus Meinzer;Tobias Flaisch;Lotte Wilser;Carsten Eulitz

  • Mobile phones modulate response patterns of human brain activity

    Carsten Eulitz;Peter Ullsperger;Gabriele Freude;Thomas Elbert

  • Vowel sound extraction in anterior superior temporal cortex

    Jonas Obleser;Henning Boecker;Alexander Drzezga;Bernhard Haslinger

  • Magnetic and electric brain activity evoked by the processing of tone and vowel stimuli

    Carsten Eulitz;Eugen Diesch;Christo Pantev;Scott Hampson

  • Magnetic Brain Response Mirrors Extraction of Phonological Features from Spoken Vowels

    Jonas Obleser;Aditi Lahiri;Carsten Eulitz

  • Relationship of transient and steady-state auditory evoked fields

    Christo Pantev;Thomas Elbert;Scott Makeig;S. Hampson

  • High-frequency cortical responses reflect lexical processing: an MEG study

    Friedemann Pulvermüller;Carsten Eulitz;Christo Pantev;Bettina Mohr

  • The auditory evoked off response : Sources and comparison with the on and the sustained responses

    C Pantev;C Eulitz;S Hampson;B Ross

  • Recovery from aphasia as a function of language therapy in an early bilingual patient demonstrated by fMRI.

    Marcus Meinzer;Jonas Obleser;Tobias Flaisch;Carsten Eulitz

  • The auditory evoked sustained field : origin and frequency dependence

    Christo Pantev;Carsten Eulitz;Thomas Elbert;Manfried Hoke

  • Cortical representation of vowels reflects acoustic dissimilarity determined by formant frequencies

    Jonas Obleser;Thomas Elbert;Aditi Lahiri;Carsten Eulitz

  • ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs

    Eva Smolka;Katrin H. Preller;Carsten Eulitz

  • The neurotopography of vowels as mirrored by evoked magnetic field measurements.

    Eugen Diesch;Carsten Eulitz;Scott Hampson;Bernhard Ross

  • “What you encode is not necessarily what you store”: Evidence for sparse feature representations from mismatch negativity.

    Sonia A. Cornell;Aditi Lahiri;Carsten Eulitz

  • Binaural fusion and the representation of virtual pitch in the human auditory cortex

    Christo Pantev;Thomas Elbert;Bernhard Ross;Carsten Eulitz

  • Oscillatory neuromagnetic activity induced by language and non-language stimuli

    Carsten Eulitz;Carsten Eulitz;Burkhard Maess;Christo Pantev;Angela D. Friederici

  • Top-down knowledge supports the retrieval of lexical information from degraded speech

    R. Hannemann;Jonas Obleser;C. Eulitz

  • Not every pseudoword disrupts word recognition: an ERP study

    Claudia K Friedrich;Claudia K Friedrich;Carsten Eulitz;Aditi Lahiri

  • Auditory-evoked magnetic field codes place of articulation in timing and topography around 100 milliseconds post syllable onset.

    Jonas Obleser;Aditi Lahiri;Carsten Eulitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Elbert
Thomas Elbert University of Konstanz
Jonas Obleser
Jonas Obleser University of Lübeck
Christo Pantev
Christo Pantev University of Münster
Brigitte Rockstroh
Brigitte Rockstroh University of Konstanz
Bernd Feige
Bernd Feige University of Freiburg
Burkhard Maess
Burkhard Maess Max Planck Society
Bernhard Ross
Bernhard Ross University of Toronto
Christian Wienbruch
Christian Wienbruch University of Konstanz
Friedemann Pulvermüller
Friedemann Pulvermüller Freie Universität Berlin
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens the door to diverse career and educational pathways. Many students interested in brain science and behavior also consider related fields like psychology, counseling, and social work. Today, there are a variety of affordable online options for those looking to pursue advanced or alternative degrees alongside or instead of neuroscience.

For those interested in therapy and counseling careers, consider a masters in marriage and family therapy online. This is ideal for those passionate about helping families and couples. Aspiring psychologists can explore flexible options such as a masters in psychology online cheap or even the cheapest online bachelor's degree in psychology. Both cater to students looking for cost-effective ways to study mental health and behavior.

Social work is another meaningful path for neuroscience majors with an interest in community well-being. Accessible programs like an online master's in social work can provide advanced skills for making a real-world impact.

Exploring these online pathways can enhance your expertise and career options, whether you wish to supplement a neuroscience background or pivot into a closely related field.

Best Scientists Citing Carsten Eulitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles