World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
68691
World Ranking
9937
National Ranking
757

Roman A. Laskowski publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roman A. Laskowski sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 146 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Roman A. Laskowski D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roman A. Laskowski sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roman A. Laskowski is affiliated with the European Bioinformatics Institute in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses extensively on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a specialization in molecular biology as well as related subfields such as materials chemistry, genetics, computational theory and mathematics, and spectroscopy.

The scientist's work covers several main topics:

  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Roman A. Laskowski has contributed to various recent papers, including the following:

  • A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications, 2022, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
  • AlphaFold heralds a data-driven revolution in biology and medicine, 2021, Nature Medicine
  • A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold 2 applications, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PDBsum extras: SARS-CoV-2 and AlphaFold models, 2021, Protein Science
  • PDBsum1: A standalone program for generating PDBsum analyses, 2022, Protein Science

Their publication record also reveals frequent collaboration with several authors, such as:

  • Janet M. Thornton
  • Neera Borkakoti
  • Pedro Beltrão
  • James Stephenson
  • Mehmet Akdel

Roman A. Laskowski's research outputs have appeared predominantly in well-known venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Protein Science
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
  • Nature Medicine
  • Blood

Best Publications

  • PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures

    R. A. Laskowski;M. W. MacArthur;D. S. Moss;J. M. Thornton

  • AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR

    R A Laskowski;J A Rullmannn;M W MacArthur;R Kaptein

  • LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions

    Andrew C. Wallace;Roman A. Laskowski;Janet M. Thornton

  • LigPlot+: multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery.

    Roman A. Laskowski;Mark B. Swindells

  • Main-chain bond lengths and bond angles in protein structures.

    Roman A. Laskowski;David S. Moss;Janet M. Thornton

  • SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions.

    Roman A. Laskowski

  • PDBsum: Structural summaries of PDB entries

    Roman A. Laskowski;Jagoda Jabłońska;Lukáš Pravda;Radka Svobodová Vařeková

  • Amino acid–base interactions: a three-dimensional analysis of protein–DNA interactions at an atomic level

    Nicholas M. Luscombe;Roman A. Laskowski;Janet M. Thornton

  • PDBsum: summaries and analyses of PDB structures

    Roman A. Laskowski

  • ProFunc: a server for predicting protein function from 3D structure

    Roman A. Laskowski;James D. Watson;Janet M. Thornton

  • PDBsum: a web-based database of summaries and analyses of all PDB structures

    Roman A. Laskowski;E.Gail Hutchinson;Alex D. Michie;Andrew C. Wallace

  • PDBsum new things.

    Roman A. Laskowski

  • A genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 22 loci associated with eight hematological parameters in the HaemGen consortium

    Nicole Soranzo;Nicole Soranzo;Tim D Spector;Massimo Mangino;Brigitte Kühnel

  • Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function.

    R. A. Laskowski;N. M. Luscombe;M. B. Swindells;J. M. Thornton

  • PDBsum more: new summaries and analyses of the known 3D structures of proteins and nucleic acids

    Roman A. Laskowski;Victor V. Chistyakov;Janet M. Thornton

  • Predicting protein ligand binding sites by combining evolutionary sequence conservation and 3D structure.

    John A. Capra;Roman A. Laskowski;Janet M. Thornton;Mona Singh

  • CATH: comprehensive structural and functional annotations for genome sequences

    Ian Sillitoe;Tony E. Lewis;Alison L. Cuff;Sayoni Das

  • Predicting protein function from sequence and structural data.

    James D Watson;Roman A Laskowski;Janet M Thornton

  • Derivation of 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases: application to Ser-His-Asp catalytic triads in the serine proteinases and lipases.

    Andrew C. Wallace;Roman A. Laskowski;Janet M. Thornton

  • PROCHECK: validation of protein-structure coordinates

    R. A. Laskowski;M. W. MacArthur;J. M. Thornton

Frequent Co-Authors

Janet M. Thornton
Janet M. Thornton European Bioinformatics Institute
Aled M. Edwards
Aled M. Edwards Structural Genomics Consortium
Andrzej Joachimiak
Andrzej Joachimiak Argonne National Laboratory
Christine A. Orengo
Christine A. Orengo University College London
Alexei Savchenko
Alexei Savchenko University of Calgary
Cheryl H. Arrowsmith
Cheryl H. Arrowsmith Structural Genomics Consortium
Rongguang Zhang
Rongguang Zhang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Nicholas M. Luscombe
Nicholas M. Luscombe The Francis Crick Institute
Youngchang Kim
Youngchang Kim Argonne National Laboratory
Ian Sillitoe
Ian Sillitoe University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Biology and Biochemistry often explore diverse careers, including those in healthcare information. One popular route is medical coding and billing, which allows you to contribute to patient care through accurate management of medical records and insurance claims.

Certification matters in this field. Understanding the difference between certified coding specialist credentials and other certifications can help you determine which best fits your goals. These distinctions can also affect pay and advancement opportunities.

If you’re wondering about compensation in this industry, consider learning more about how much do medical coders make. Wages vary by education, certification, and setting, but this field offers stable income with opportunities for remote work.

Prospective students may be concerned about the future of this career. Is is medical coding a dying career a real worry? Current trends show that while automation is changing the field, skilled coding professionals remain in demand.

For those who want flexibility and affordability, there are now many online health information management degree programs available. These options make it easier to start or advance your career in medical data and records management from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Roman A. Laskowski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles