World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark Patrick Taylor

Mark Patrick Taylor

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
8710
World Ranking
4786
National Ranking
167

Mark Patrick Taylor publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Patrick Taylor sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 243 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark Patrick Taylor D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Patrick Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Patrick Taylor is a researcher affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia. Their work primarily focuses on environmental science, with a significant number of publications addressing health, toxicology, and pollution-related topics.

The researcher's recent papers include the following:

  • Quantification and exposure assessment of microplastics in Australian indoor house dust, 2021, Environmental Pollution
  • Blood lead levels in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review, 2021, The Lancet Planetary Health
  • Anthropogenic contamination of residential environments from smelter As, Cu and Pb emissions: Implications for human health, 2020, Environmental Pollution
  • A citizen science approach to identifying trace metal contamination risks in urban gardens, 2021, Environment International
  • International Analysis of Sources and Human Health Risk Associated with Trace Metal Contaminants in Residential Indoor Dust, 2021, Environmental Science & Technology

Their frequent coauthors are:

  • Kara Fry
  • Max M. Gillings
  • Cynthia Faye Isley
  • Gabriel Filippelli
  • Chenyin Dong

Mark Patrick Taylor often publishes in the following venues:

  • Environmental Pollution
  • Environmental Research
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • The Science of The Total Environment

The main field of study for this researcher is environmental science. Subfields include:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Pollution
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

The primary research topics encompass:

  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
  • Mercury impact and mitigation studies

Best Publications

  • A review on the importance of metals and metalloids in atmospheric dust and aerosol from mining operations.

    Janae Csavina;Jason Field;Mark P. Taylor;Song Gao

  • Linking Source and Effect: Resuspended Soil Lead, Air Lead, and Children's Blood Lead Levels in Detroit, Michigan

    Sammy Zahran;Mark A. S. Laidlaw;Shawn P. McElmurry;Gabriel M. Filippelli

  • A geomorphological framework for river characterization and habitat assessment

    J.R. Thomson;M.P. Taylor;K.A. Fryirs;G.J. Brierley

  • Quantification and exposure assessment of microplastics in Australian indoor house dust.

    Neda Sharifi Soltani;Mark Patrick Taylor;Scott Paton Wilson

  • Can field portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) produce high quality data for application in environmental contamination research?

    Marek Rouillon;Mark P. Taylor

  • Why rehabilitate urban river systems

    Sophia Jane Findlay;Mark Patrick Taylor

  • Soil Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn contaminants around Mount Isa city, Queensland, Australia: Potential sources and risks to human health

    Mark P. Taylor;Alana K. Mackay;Karen A. Hudson-Edwards;Elmar Holz

  • Re-suspension of lead contaminated urban soil as a dominant source of atmospheric lead in Birmingham, Chicago, Detroit and Pittsburgh, USA

    Mark A.S. Laidlaw;Sammy Zahran;Howard W. Mielke;Mark P. Taylor

  • Potential for childhood lead poisoning in the inner cities of Australia due to exposure to lead in soil dust

    Mark A.S. Laidlaw;Mark P. Taylor

  • Blood lead levels in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review

    Bret Ericson;Howard Hu;Howard Hu;Emily Nash;Greg Ferraro

  • Widespread copper and lead contamination of household drinking water, New South Wales, Australia

    P.J. Harvey;H.K. Handley;M.P. Taylor

  • Authenticity and geographic origin of global honeys determined using carbon isotope ratios and trace elements.

    Xiaoteng Zhou;Mark Patrick Taylor;Helen Salouros;Shiva Prasad

  • Identification of environmental lead sources and pathways in a mining and smelting town: Mount Isa, Australia

    A.K. Mackay;M.P. Taylor;N.C. Munksgaard;Karen A. Hudson-Edwards

  • Sediment load and floodplain deposition rates: Comparison of the Fly and Strickland rivers, Papua New Guinea

    Kathleen M Swanson;Elizabeth Watson;Rolf Aalto;J. Wesley Lauer

  • 2000 years of sediment-borne heavy metal storage in the Yorkshire Ouse basin, NE England, UK

    Karen A. Hudson-Edwards;Karen A. Hudson-Edwards;Mark G. Macklin;Mark P. Taylor

  • Size-resolved dust and aerosol contaminants associated with copper and lead smelting emissions: Implications for emission management and human health

    Janae Csavina;Mark P. Taylor;Omar Félix;Kyle P. Rine

  • Environmental arsenic, cadmium and lead dust emissions from metal mine operations: Implications for environmental management, monitoring and human health.

    Mark Patrick Taylor;Simon Anthony Mould;Louise Jane Kristensen;Marek Rouillon

  • Sono-cathodic stripping voltammetry of lead at a polished boron-doped diamond electrode: Application to the determination of lead in river sediment

    Andrew J. Saterlay;César Agra-Gutiérrez;Mark P. Taylor;Frank Marken

  • International Analysis of Sources and Human Health Risk Associated with Trace Metal Contaminants in Residential Indoor Dust.

    Unknown

  • Environmental lead exposure risks associated with children's outdoor playgrounds

    Mark Patrick Taylor;Danielle Camenzuli;Louise Jane Kristensen;Miriam Forbes

  • Historic metal mining inputs to Tees river sediment

    Karen Hudson-Edwards;Mark Macklin;Mark Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Karen A. Hudson-Edwards
Karen A. Hudson-Edwards University of Exeter
Lucio Sarno
Lucio Sarno University of Cambridge
Gabriel M. Filippelli
Gabriel M. Filippelli Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Peter F. Nelson
Peter F. Nelson Macquarie University
Russell N. Drysdale
Russell N. Drysdale University of Melbourne
Bruce P. Lanphear
Bruce P. Lanphear Simon Fraser University
Miriam K. Forbes
Miriam K. Forbes Macquarie University
Kirstie Fryirs
Kirstie Fryirs Macquarie University
Gary Brierley
Gary Brierley University of Auckland
Brian Gulson
Brian Gulson Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an Environmental Sciences degree opens doors to various interdisciplinary career options. Many students complement their studies by exploring degrees in public administration, sociology, and education to enhance their impact in environmental policy, community outreach, and sustainable development.

For those interested in leadership roles within governmental or non-profit sectors, top online MPA programs offer specialized training that can be completed in a year, providing a fast track to management positions. Additionally, programs offering accredited online bachelors in sociology equip students with a deeper understanding of societal dynamics, crucial for developing effective environmental policies and community programs.

Advancing your education further is possible through online doctoral programs without dissertation requirements, ideal for professionals seeking to deepen expertise without the traditional research commitments. For educators aiming to transition from teaching credentials to advanced doctoral qualifications, several top schools with online EdS to EdD programs provide flexible pathways that integrate environmental education with leadership practice.

By combining Environmental Sciences with these related online degrees, graduates can expand their career prospects and make a broader impact on environmental sustainability and policy development.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Patrick Taylor

Trending Scientists