World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10688 10008 518 510 100 2961

Kathrin Finke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kathrin Finke between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kathrin Finke published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2023. 28 of the 159 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2023. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 14 publications
1998 2025

159 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kathrin Finke: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 3
2005 3
2006 4
2007 2
2008 0
2009 10
2010 8
2011 8
2012 3
2013 5
2014 6
2015 6
2016 5
2017 7
2018 7
2019 7
2020 9
2021 9
2022 11
2023 17
2024 14
2025 14
Total 159
Download as CSV

Kathrin Finke publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathrin Finke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 100 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 100
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kathrin Finke D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathrin Finke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kathrin Finke is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany, contributing extensively to the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a strong focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology. Their research spans a broad range of topics related to cognitive health, neurological disorders, and the long-term effects of infectious diseases.

Their recent publications highlight involvement in studies addressing long-term consequences of COVID-19, cognitive impairments, and psychiatric outcomes. Notable papers include:

  • Larger gray matter volumes in neuropsychiatric long-COVID syndrome, 2022, Psychiatry Research
  • Long COVID is associated with severe cognitive slowing: a multicentre cross-sectional study, 2024, EClinicalMedicine
  • Comparison of fatigue, cognitive dysfunction and psychological disorders in post-COVID patients and patients after sepsis: is there a specific constellation?, 2022, Infection
  • Introducing the tablet-based Oxford Cognitive Screen-Plus (OCS-Plus) as an assessment tool for subtle cognitive impairments, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Long COVID: a narrative review of the clinical aftermaths of COVID-19 with a focus on the putative pathophysiology and aspects of physical activity, 2022, Oxford Open Immunology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kathrin Finke include:

  • Philipp A. Reuken
  • Andreas Stallmach
  • Bianca Besteher
  • Adriana L. Ruiz-Rizzo
  • Stefan Brodoehl

Their work is published predominantly in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Infection
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Scientific Reports
  • Psychiatry Research

In total, their research output includes 99 publications categorized under Medicine and 57 under Neuroscience. The subfields of study are notably concentrated in Cognitive Neuroscience (44 publications), Neurology (37 publications), Psychiatry and Mental Health (21 publications), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (11 publications), and Clinical Psychology (11 publications).

Main topics addressed in their research encompass:

  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Best Publications

  • Cognitive deficits in patients with a chronic vestibular failure

    Pauline Popp;Melanie Wulff;Kathrin Finke;Maxine Rühl

  • Effects of modafinil and methylphenidate on visual attention capacity: a TVA-based study

    Kathrin Finke;Chris M. Dodds;Chris M. Dodds;Peter Bublak;Ralf Regenthal

  • The influence of alertness on spatial and nonspatial components of visual attention.

    Ellen Matthias;Peter Bublak;Hermann J. Müller;Werner X. Schneider

  • Staged decline of visual processing capacity in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

    Peter Bublak;Petra Redel;Christian Sorg;Alexander Kurz

  • Usability of a theory of visual attention (TVA) for parameter-based measurement of attention I: evidence from normal subjects.

    Kathrin Finke;Peter Bublak;Joseph Krummenacher;Søren Kyllingsbæk

  • How do you make me feel better? Social cognitive emotion regulation and the default mode network

    Xiyao Xie;Satja Mulej Bratec;Gabriele Schmid;Chun Meng

  • Deficits of spatial and task-related attentional selection in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

    P. Redel;P. Bublak;C. Sorg;A. Kurz

  • Distinct Neural Markers of TVA-Based Visual Processing Speed and Short-Term Storage Capacity Parameters

    Iris Wiegand;Thomas Töllner;Thomas Habekost;Mads Dyrholm

  • Parameter-based assessment of spatial and non-spatial attentional deficits in Huntington's disease

    Kathrin Finke;Peter Bublak;Matthias Dose;Hermann J. Müller

  • Neural correlates of age-related decline and compensation in visual attention capacity.

    Iris Wiegand;Iris Wiegand;Thomas Töllner;Mads Dyrholm;Hermann J. Müller;Hermann J. Müller

  • Slow Perceptual Processing at the Core of Developmental Dyslexia: A Parameter-Based Assessment of Visual Attention.

    Prisca Stenneken;Johanna Egetemeir;Gerd Schulte-Körne;Herrmann J: Müller

  • Video game experience and its influence on visual attention parameters: an investigation using the framework of the Theory of Visual Attention (TVA)

    Torsten Schubert;Kathrin Finke;Petra Redel;Steffen Kluckow

  • Visual spatial and visual pattern working memory: neuropsychological evidence for a differential role of left and right dorsal visual brain.

    Kathrin Finke;Peter Bublak;Josef Zihl

  • Attentional and sensory effects of lowered levels of intrinsic alertness.

    Ellen Matthias;Peter Bublak;Anna Costa;Hermann J. Müller

  • Usability of a theory of visual attention (TVA) for parameter-based measurement of attention II: evidence from two patients with frontal or parietal damage.

    Peter Bublak;Kathrin Finke;Joseph Krummenacher;Rudolf Preger

  • The capacity of attention and simultaneous perception of objects: a group study of Huntington's disease patients.

    Kathrin Finke;Werner X. Schneider;Petra Redel;Matthias Dose

  • Preattentive surface and contour grouping in Kanizsa figures: Evidence from parietal extinction

    Markus Conci;Eva Böbel;Ellen Matthias;Ingo Keller

  • Spatial and non-spatial attention deficits in neurodegenerative diseases: assessment based on Bundesen's theory of visual attention (TVA).

    Peter Bublak;Petra Redel;Kathrin Finke

  • Introducing the tablet-based Oxford Cognitive Screen-Plus (OCS-Plus) as an assessment tool for subtle cognitive impairments.

    Nele Demeyere;Marleen Haupt;Sam S Webb;Lea Strobel

  • Decreased cingulo-opercular network functional connectivity mediates the impact of aging on visual processing speed.

    Adriana L. Ruiz-Rizzo;Christian Sorg;Natan Napiórkowski;Julia Neitzel

  • Event-related potentials dissociate perceptual from response-related age effects in visual search

    Iris Wiegand;Kathrin Finke;Hermann J. Müller;Hermann J. Müller;Thomas Töllner

  • How does phasic alerting improve performance in patients with unilateral neglect? A systematic analysis of attentional processing capacity and spatial weighting mechanisms.

    Kathrin Finke;Ellen Matthias;Ingo Keller;Hermann J. Müller

Frequent Co-Authors

Hermann J. Müller
Hermann J. Müller Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Christian Sorg
Christian Sorg Technical University of Munich
Werner X. Schneider
Werner X. Schneider Bielefeld University
Georg Kerkhoff
Georg Kerkhoff Saarland University
Hans Förstl
Hans Förstl Technical University of Munich
Torsten Schubert
Torsten Schubert Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Afra M. Wohlschläger
Afra M. Wohlschläger Technical University of Munich
Claus Bundesen
Claus Bundesen University of Copenhagen
Robert Perneczky
Robert Perneczky Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Valentin Riedl
Valentin Riedl Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in psychology, you’ll find many related online degrees that can open up exciting professional pathways. One growing field is social work, which shares core values with psychology, such as promoting well-being and supporting individuals in need. Many students choose to earn their psychology degrees before pursuing a Master of Social Work (MSW) or similar credentials.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Fortunately, there are affordable social work programs in Mississippi that provide solid online options. If you’re in or near New York, you might explore affordable social work programs in New York City. For those in neighboring states, affordable social work degrees in New Jersey are also available, offering both online and hybrid formats.

Students on the West Coast may be interested in the cheapest social work degrees in Nevada. Exploring these affordable degree options can help you take the next step toward a fulfilling career in counseling, clinical social work, or other psychology-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Kathrin Finke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles