World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
5655
World Ranking
12536
National Ranking
193

Ofer Strichman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ofer Strichman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 133 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ofer Strichman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ofer Strichman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ofer Strichman is affiliated with the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology in Israel. Their research focuses mainly on computer science, with a significant emphasis on software, computational theory and mathematics, and artificial intelligence. The main topics covered in their work include formal methods in verification, software testing and debugging techniques, software reliability and analysis research, model-driven software engineering techniques, logic, programming, and type systems, software engineering research, and diagnosis of COVID-19 using AI.

Their frequent coauthors include Jianwen Li, Geguang Pu, Hana Chockler, Roderick Bloem, and Masoud Ebrahimi, with multiple joint publications reflecting ongoing collaborations.

Ofer Strichman has published in a variety of venues, contributing six papers to arXiv (Cornell University), two to Formal Methods in System Design, one to the Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, one to the Proceedings of the 41st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, and one to Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl).

Several recent papers include:

  • Learning the Language of Software Errors, 2020, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  • Automated Repair of Neural Networks, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Certified CNF Translations for Pseudo-Boolean Solving, 2022, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Specifiable robustness in reactive synthesis, 2022, Formal Methods in System Design
  • Combining BMC and Complementary Approximate Reachability to Accelerate Bug-Finding, 2022, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design

In the area of book publications, Strichman contributed to the proceedings of the 20th Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design - FMCAD 2020, published by the University of Udine.

Best Publications

  • Bounded Model Checking

    Armin Biere;Alessandro Cimatti;Edmund M. Clarke;Ofer Strichman

  • Decision Procedures: An Algorithmic Point of View

    Daniel Kroening;Ofer Strichman

  • Efficient computation of recurrence diameters

    Daniel Kroening;Ofer Strichman

  • Error explanation with distance metrics

    Alex Groce;Sagar Chaki;Daniel Kroening;Ofer Strichman

  • SAT Based Abstraction-Refinement Using ILP and Machine Learning Techniques

    Edmund M. Clarke;Anubhav Gupta;James H. Kukula;Ofer Shrichman

  • Deciding bit-vector arithmetic with abstraction

    Randal E. Bryant;Daniel Kroening;Joël Ouaknine;Sanjit A. Seshia

  • Efficient Computation of Recurrence Diameters

    Daniel Kroening;Ofer Strichman

  • Completeness and Complexity of Bounded Model Checking

    Edmund M. Clarke;Daniel Kroening;Joël Ouaknine;Ofer Strichman

  • Decision Procedures

    Unknown

  • Regression verification

    Benny Godlin;Ofer Strichman

  • Deciding separation formulas with SAT

    Ofer Strichman;Sanjit A. Seshia;Randal E. Bryant

  • Deciding Separation Formulas with SAT

    Ofer Strichman;Sanjit A. Seshia;Randal E. Bryant

  • Deciding Equality Formulas by Small Domains Instantiations

    Amir Pnueli;Yoav Rodeh;Ofer Shtrichman;Michael Siegel

  • The Code Validation Tool (CVT)

    A. Pnueli;O. Shtrichman;M. Siegel

  • Regression verification: proving the equivalence of similar programs

    Benny Godlin;Ofer Strichman

  • SAT-based counterexample-guided abstraction refinement

    E.M. Clarke;A. Gupta;O. Strichman

  • Efficient Verification of Sequential and Concurrent C Programs

    S. Chaki;E. Clarke;A. Groce;J. Ouaknine

  • Accelerating Bounded Model Checking of Safety Properties

    Ofer Strichman

  • Proof-guided underapproximation-widening for multi-process systems

    Orna Grumberg;Flavio Lerda;Ofer Strichman;Michael Theobald

  • The small model property: how small can it be?

    Amir Pnueli;Yoav Rodeh;Ofer Strichmann;Michael Siegel

  • Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2010

    Ofer Strichman;Stefan Szeider

  • Inference rules for proving the equivalence of recursive procedures

    Benny Godlin;Ofer Strichman

  • Explaining abstract counterexamples

    Sagar Chaki;Alex Groce;Ofer Strichman

  • SAT based abstraction-refinement using ILP and machine learning techniques

    Edmund Clarke;Anubhav Gupta;James Kukula;Ofer Strichman

  • Regression Verification: Proving the Equivalence of Similar Programs

    Ofer Strichman

  • SPECIAL S ECTION O N T OOLS A ND A LGORITHMS F OR THE C ONSTRUCTION A ND A NALYSIS O F S YSTEMS

    Alex Groce;Sagar Chaki;Daniel Kroening;Ofer Strichman

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Kroening
Daniel Kroening Amazon (United States)
Sagar Chaki
Sagar Chaki Siemens (United States)
Joël Ouaknine
Joël Ouaknine Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
Edmund M. Clarke
Edmund M. Clarke Carnegie Mellon University
Arie Gurfinkel
Arie Gurfinkel University of Waterloo
Sanjit A. Seshia
Sanjit A. Seshia University of California, Berkeley
Alex Groce
Alex Groce Northern Arizona University
Randal E. Bryant
Randal E. Bryant Carnegie Mellon University
Roderick Bloem
Roderick Bloem Graz University of Technology
Amir Pnueli
Amir Pnueli Weizmann Institute of Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related fields helps broaden your career options in technology. Besides Computer Science, students often consider specialized online degrees for greater flexibility. For example, an online physics degree can be a strong choice for those interested in scientific computing or engineering foundations.

Data science is another fast-growing field closely linked to computer science. If affordability is a concern, consider researching what is the cheapest data science course in the us? to find programs that fit your budget.

Engineering skills also remain in high demand. For those considering a technical or hardware-focused path, review the top online electrical engineering schools in the USA for well-regarded and flexible programs.

If you’re looking to upskill quickly, there are also easy certifications to get that pay well, helping you boost your resume and unlock new career options with less time investment.

Best Scientists Citing Ofer Strichman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles