World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wilma L. Lingle

Wilma L. Lingle

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
20847
World Ranking
12918
National Ranking
5502

Wilma L. Lingle publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilma L. Lingle sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 147 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Wilma L. Lingle D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilma L. Lingle sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wilma L. Lingle is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and focuses their research primarily within the field of medicine, with a particular emphasis on oncology and reproductive medicine. Their work spans several specialized topics related to cancer diagnosis and treatment.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
  • Lung cancer research studies

Wilma L. Lingle has published in journals such as Cancers, contributing research findings relevant to advancing medical knowledge in cancer therapies and diagnostics.

One notable publication by Lingle is:

  • CHFR and Paclitaxel Sensitivity of Ovarian Cancer, 2021, published in Cancers

Their scientific collaborations include frequent co-authorship with researchers such as Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson, Daniel W. Visscher, Xiaonan Hou, Krista M. Goergen, and Hunter J. Atkinson. These collaborations indicate active engagement within a network of researchers focused on oncology and related biomedical studies.

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours

    Daniel C. Koboldt;Robert S. Fulton;Michael D. McLellan;Heather Schmidt

  • Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer

    Edward H. Romond;Edith A. Perez;John Bryant;Vera J. Suman

  • Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer

    Lynn C. Hartmann;Thomas A. Sellers;Marlene H. Frost;Wilma L. Lingle

  • Pharmacogenetics of Tamoxifen Biotransformation Is Associated With Clinical Outcomes of Efficacy and Hot Flashes

    Matthew P. Goetz;James M. Rae;Vera J. Suman;Stephanie L. Safgren

  • FKBP51 affects cancer cell response to chemotherapy by negatively regulating Akt.

    Huadong Pei;Liang Li;Brooke L. Fridley;Gregory D. Jenkins

  • Centrosome amplification drives chromosomal instability in breast tumor development.

    Wilma L. Lingle;Susan L. Barrett;Vivian C. Negron;Antonino B. D'Assoro

  • The impact of cytochrome P450 2D6 metabolism in women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen.

    Matthew P. Goetz;Stacey K. Knox;Vera J. Suman;James M. Rae

  • Centrosome hypertrophy in human breast tumors: Implications for genomic stability and cell polarity

    Wilma L. Lingle;Ward H. Lutz;James N. Ingle;Nita J. Maihle

  • HER2 Testing by Local, Central, and Reference Laboratories in Specimens From the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 Intergroup Adjuvant Trial

    Edith A. Perez;Vera J. Suman;Nancy E. Davidson;Silvana Martino

  • Centrosome amplification and the development of cancer.

    Antonino B D'Assoro;Wilma L Lingle;Jeffrey L Salisbury

  • Stratification of Breast Cancer Risk in Women With Atypia: A Mayo Cohort Study

    Amy C. Degnim;Daniel W. Visscher;Hal K. Berman;Marlene H. Frost

  • Folate receptor overexpression is associated with poor outcome in breast cancer.

    Lynn C. Hartmann;Gary L. Keeney;Wilma L. Lingle;Teresa J.H. Christianson

  • Altered centrosome structure is associated with abnormal mitoses in human breast tumors.

    Wilma L. Lingle;Jeffrey L. Salisbury

  • HER2 and Chromosome 17 Effect on Patient Outcome in the N9831 Adjuvant Trastuzumab Trial

    Edith A. Perez;Monica M. Reinholz;David W. Hillman;Kathleen S. Tenner

  • Cellular Concentrations and Uniformity of Cell-Type Accumulation of Two Lea Proteins in Cotton Embryos.

    James K. Roberts;Noelle A. DeSimone;Wilma L. Lingle;Leon Dure

  • A Two-Gene Expression Ratio of Homeobox 13 and Interleukin-17B Receptor for Prediction of Recurrence and Survival in Women Receiving Adjuvant Tamoxifen

    Matthew P. Goetz;Vera J. Suman;James N. Ingle;Andrea M. Nibbe

  • Estrogen mediates Aurora-A overexpression, centrosome amplification, chromosomal instability, and breast cancer in female ACI rats.

    Jonathan J. Li;S. John Weroha;Wilma L. Lingle;Dan Papa

  • Phosphorylation of centrin during the cell cycle and its role in centriole separation preceding centrosome duplication.

    Ward Lutz;Wilma L. Lingle;Daniel McCormick;Tammy M. Greenwood

  • The mitotic checkpoint protein hBUB3 and the mRNA export factor hRAE1 interact with GLE2p-binding sequence (GLEBS)-containing proteins.

    Xianshu Wang;J. Ramesh Babu;Jeffry M. Harden;Sandra A. Jablonski

  • Centrosomes and cancer.

    Jeffrey L Salisbury;Clark M Whitehead;Wilma L Lingle;Susan L Barrett

Frequent Co-Authors

Amylou C. Dueck
Amylou C. Dueck Mayo Clinic
Edith A. Perez
Edith A. Perez Mayo Clinic
James N. Ingle
James N. Ingle Mayo Clinic
Vera J. Suman
Vera J. Suman Mayo Clinic
Nancy E. Davidson
Nancy E. Davidson University of Washington
Lynn C. Hartmann
Lynn C. Hartmann Mayo Clinic
Fergus J. Couch
Fergus J. Couch Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students who pursue Biology or Biochemistry in the USA can unlock a range of online degree options and career pathways in the healthcare and life science sectors. Interest in fast-tracked education is high, especially with options like an accelerated healthcare management degree online. Such programs can quickly lead to leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, or biotechnology firms.

For those interested in specialized fields, earning credentials through the shortest pmhnp program can open doors to advanced practice roles in mental health care. Meanwhile, students looking to blend biological sciences with nutrition may consider an online nutrition degree, which prepares graduates for opportunities in wellness, dietetics, and public health.

Business-minded graduates might aim for leadership roles by pursuing a healthcare MBA. For those prioritizing affordability, it’s important to explore healthcare mba cost comparisons to find quality programs that fit their budget. Each of these online pathways enables flexibility, career progression, and skill development tailored to life sciences professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Wilma L. Lingle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles