What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Statistics
- Ecosystem
Ecology, Arctic, Habitat, Range and Salvelinus are his primary areas of study.
Many of his research projects under Ecology are closely connected to Oil sands with Oil sands, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.
His Trophic level research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Isotope analysis, δ15N and Food chain.
Michael Power interconnects Freshwater fish, Ecology, Environmental resource management, Fisheries management and Bycatch in the investigation of issues within Habitat.
While the research belongs to areas of Range, Michael Power spends his time largely on the problem of Fish migration, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Fecundity and Fish measurement.
His work focuses on many connections between Salvelinus and other disciplines, such as Sympatric speciation, that overlap with his field of interest in Subspecies, Allopatric speciation and Biodiversity.
His most cited work include:
- Alzheimer-type neuropathology in transgenic mice overexpressing V717F beta-amyloid precursor protein. (2313 citations)
- Purification and cloning of amyloid precursor protein beta-secretase from human brain. (1529 citations)
- Climatic influence on a marine fish assemblage (248 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Ecology, Arctic, Salvelinus, Fishery and Trophic level.
His study involves Habitat, Predation, Range, Isotope analysis and Pelagic zone, a branch of Ecology.
His Arctic study incorporates themes from Fish migration and Climate change.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Littoral zone and Otolith in addition to Salvelinus.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Trout and Salmo.
Michael Power is interested in Food web, which is a branch of Trophic level.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (58.94%)
- Arctic (30.49%)
- Salvelinus (29.27%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Ecology (58.94%)
- Arctic (30.49%)
- Fish migration (12.60%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Michael Power spends much of his time researching Ecology, Arctic, Fish migration, Salvelinus and Fishery.
His study in Trophic level, Habitat, Isotope analysis, Range and Predation is carried out as part of his Ecology studies.
His studies in Trophic level integrate themes in fields like Floodplain, Benthic zone, Pelagic zone and Guild.
The concepts of his Arctic study are interwoven with issues in δ13C and δ15N.
His Fish migration research incorporates elements of Arctic char, Diel vertical migration, Spawn and Seasonality.
His Fishery research integrates issues from Peer review, Ecosystem and Downstream.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Trophic Ecology of Arapaima sp. in a ria lake—river–floodplain transition zone of the Amazon (21 citations)
- Bonefish in South Florida: status, threats and research needs (13 citations)
- One Hundred Pressing Questions on the Future of Global Fish Migration Science, Conservation, and Policy (12 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Statistics
- Ecosystem
Michael Power mainly investigates Ecology, Fishery, Habitat, Arctic and Trophic level.
His work on Subarctic climate, Trophic niche and Abiotic component as part of general Ecology research is frequently linked to Hydrobiologia and Norwegian, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His Fishery research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Upstream and Downstream.
His Habitat research includes elements of Range, Bonefish, Bonefishes, Interspecific competition and Ecosystem.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Salvelinus, Fish migration and Spawn in addition to Arctic.
Michael Power has included themes like Ecological niche, Isotope analysis, Pelagic zone, Boreogadus saida and Benthic zone in his Trophic level study.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
