World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthias Staufenbiel

Matthias Staufenbiel

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 107 613 556 41 38 299 41863
Medicine 107 6258 5888 357 343 309 41964

Matthias Staufenbiel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthias Staufenbiel between 1982 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthias Staufenbiel published across 43 years, from 1982 to 2024, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2006. 3 of the 317 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2006. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 30 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications
1982 2024

317 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthias Staufenbiel: publications per year, 1982 to 2024
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 3
1984 2
1985 0
1986 4
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 7
1997 6
1998 6
1999 3
2000 8
2001 8
2002 18
2003 20
2004 21
2005 16
2006 30
2007 13
2008 20
2009 17
2010 16
2011 9
2012 10
2013 16
2014 11
2015 11
2016 12
2017 5
2018 4
2019 5
2020 2
2021 1
2022 2
2023 1
2024 2
Total 317
Download as CSV

Matthias Staufenbiel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Staufenbiel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 298–307 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 299 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127 299
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthias Staufenbiel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Staufenbiel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45 107
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthias Staufenbiel is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their research spans medicine and biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, with a particular focus on physiology and molecular biology as primary subfields. Staufenbiel's work addresses topics such as Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, cell death mechanisms and regulation, prion diseases and protein misfolding, trace elements in health, cholinesterase and neurodegenerative diseases, RNA regulation and disease, and neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms.

The scientist has contributed to a number of articles published in well-known journals. Notable recent papers include:

  • Acute targeting of pre-amyloid seeds in transgenic mice reduces Alzheimer-like pathology later in life (2020, Nature Neuroscience)
  • Experimental evidence for temporal uncoupling of brain Aβ deposition and neurodegenerative sequelae (2022, Nature Communications)
  • Signatures of glial activity can be detected in the CSF proteome (2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Inhibition of an Alzheimer's disease-associated form of necroptosis rescues neuronal death in mouse models (2024, Science Translational Medicine)
  • Synthesis of the Potent, Selective, and Efficacious β-Secretase (BACE1) Inhibitor NB-360 (2021, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry)

Their frequent coauthors include Marta J. Koper, Simona Ospitalieri, Sabine Rabe, Bart De Strooper, and Sriram Balusu, each having collaborated on at least four publications. Staufenbiel's research has appeared in multiple publications in venues including Alzheimer's & Dementia (3 publications), Nature Neuroscience, Nature Communications, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Science Translational Medicine, reflecting a sustained engagement with leading journals in neurodegenerative disease and neurological research.

Research topics frequently addressed are:

  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Trace Elements in Health
  • Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • RNA regulation and disease
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Best Publications

  • Dendritic Function of Tau Mediates Amyloid-β Toxicity in Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Models

    Lars M. Ittner;Yazi D. Ke;Fabien Delerue;Mian Bi

  • Transmission and spreading of tauopathy in transgenic mouse brain

    Florence Clavaguera;Tristan Bolmont;R. Anthony Crowther;Dorothee Abramowski

  • Two amyloid precursor protein transgenic mouse models with Alzheimer disease-like pathology

    Christine Sturchler-Pierrat;Dorothee Abramowski;Mairead Duke;Karl-Heinz Wiederhold

  • Clusters of hyperactive neurons near amyloid plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Marc Aurel Busche;Gerhard Eichhoff;Gerhard Eichhoff;Helmuth Adelsberger;Helmuth Adelsberger;Dorothee Abramowski

  • Exogenous induction of cerebral beta-amyloidogenesis is governed by agent and host.

    Melanie Meyer-Luehmann;Janaky Coomaraswamy;Tristan Bolmont;Tristan Bolmont;Stephan Kaeser

  • Innate immune memory in the brain shapes neurological disease hallmarks

    Ann-Christin Wendeln;Ann-Christin Wendeln;Karoline Degenhardt;Karoline Degenhardt;Lalit Kaurani;Lalit Kaurani;Michael Gertig;Michael Gertig

  • Brain homogenates from human tauopathies induce tau inclusions in mouse brain.

    Florence Clavaguera;Hiroyasu Akatsu;Graham Fraser;R. Anthony Crowther

  • Cerebral Hemorrhage After Passive Anti-Aβ Immunotherapy

    M. Pfeifer;S. Boncristiano;L. Bondolfi;A. Stalder

  • Critical role of soluble amyloid-β for early hippocampal hyperactivity in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease

    Marc Aurel Busche;Xiaowei Chen;Horst A. Henning;Julia Reichwald

  • Destabilization of beta catenin by mutations in presenilin-1 potentiates neuronal apoptosis

    Zhuohua Zhang;H. Hartmann;Viet Minh Do;D. Abramowski

  • Hypoxia facilitates Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis by up-regulating BACE1 gene expression

    Xiulian Sun;Guiqiong He;Guiqiong He;Hong Qing;Weihui Zhou

  • Peripherally Applied Aβ-Containing Inoculates Induce Cerebral β-Amyloidosis

    Yvonne S. Eisele;Ulrike Obermüller;Ulrike Obermüller;Götz Heilbronner;Götz Heilbronner;Frank Baumann;Frank Baumann

  • Neuron loss in APP transgenic mice

    Michael E. Calhoun;Karl-Heinz Wiederhold;Dorothee Abramowski;Amie L. Phinney

  • Formation and maintenance of Alzheimer’s disease beta-amyloid plaques in the absence of microglia

    Stefan Grathwohl;R.E. Kälin;T. Bolmont;S. Prokop

  • Abeta is targeted to the vasculature in a mouse model of hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis.

    Martin C Herzig;David T Winkler;Patrick Burgermeister;Michelle Pfeifer;Michelle Pfeifer

  • Neuronal overexpression of mutant amyloid precursor protein results in prominent deposition of cerebrovascular amyloid

    Michael E. Calhoun;Patrick Burgermeister;Amie L. Phinney;Martina Stalder

  • Brain estrogen deficiency accelerates Aβ plaque formation in an Alzheimer's disease animal model

    Xu Yue;Melissa Lu;Techie Lancaster;Phillip Cao

  • Association of microglia with amyloid plaques in brains of APP23 transgenic mice.

    Martina Stalder;Amie Phinney;Alphonse Probst;Bernd Sommer

  • Deletion of tumor necrosis factor death receptor inhibits amyloid β generation and prevents learning and memory deficits in Alzheimer's mice

    Ping-Ping He;Zhenyu Zhong;Kristina Lindholm;Lilian Berning

  • Therapeutic approaches to Alzheimer's disease.

    Hans-Wolfgang Klafki;Matthias Staufenbiel;Johannes Kornhuber;Jens Wiltfang

  • TRANSMISSION AND SPREADING OF TAUOPATHIES IN TRANSGENIC MOUSE BRAIN

    Florence Clavaguera;Bernardino Ghetti;Gabriel Schweighauser;Hiroyasu Akatsu

Frequent Co-Authors

Paolo Paganetti
Paolo Paganetti Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Martin F. Bachmann
Martin F. Bachmann University of Bern
Paul M. Mathews
Paul M. Mathews New York University
Mathias Jucker
Mathias Jucker University of Tübingen
Nobuhisa Iwata
Nobuhisa Iwata Nagasaki University
Christian Haass
Christian Haass Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Makoto Higuchi
Makoto Higuchi National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology
Debby Van Dam
Debby Van Dam University of Antwerp
Lary C. Walker
Lary C. Walker Emory University
Peter Paul De Deyn
Peter Paul De Deyn University of Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience opens the door to a wide range of educational and professional opportunities. For those looking to fast-track their education, enrolling in an accelerated bachelor's degree online can help you complete your studies more quickly and enter the workforce sooner.

As you plan your academic journey, it’s also important to consider the best bachelor degrees for job security and salary potential. Many of the best majors in college are in STEM fields, which can complement neuroscience studies and broaden your career options.

Additionally, cost is a major concern for many students. To make higher education more accessible, there are a variety of online college courses with financial aid options available, allowing you to study neuroscience or related subjects without overwhelming debt.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Staufenbiel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles