World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
101
Citations
43334
World Ranking
726
National Ranking
52

Mathias Jucker publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathias Jucker sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 352 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mathias Jucker D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathias Jucker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Metlife Foundation Award for Medical Research in Alzheimer's Disease

Overview

Mathias Jucker is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields including Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Molecular Biology, Neurology, and Cognitive Neuroscience. The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on neurodegenerative diseases, particularly Alzheimer's disease. Selected papers include:

  • "A soluble phosphorylated tau signature links tau, amyloid and the evolution of stages of dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease" (2020, Nature Medicine)
  • "Alzheimer's disease: From immunotherapy to immunoprevention" (2023, Cell)
  • "Cerebrospinal fluid proteomics define the natural history of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease" (2023, Nature Medicine)
  • "Loss of function of the mitochondrial peptidase PITRM1 induces proteotoxic stress and Alzheimer's disease-like pathology in human cerebral organoids" (2020, Molecular Psychiatry)
  • "Segregation of functional networks is associated with cognitive resilience in Alzheimer's disease" (2021, Brain)

Frequent coauthors in Jucker's research include:

  • Randall J. Bateman
  • Johannes Levin
  • Tammie L.S. Benzinger
  • Eric McDade
  • Jasmeer P. Chhatwal

Common publication venues for their work comprise:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Lancet Neurology
  • Nature Medicine
  • Brain

Among the recognitions received is the Metlife Foundation Award for Medical Research in Alzheimer's Disease, awarded in 2014.

Best Publications

  • Transmission and spreading of tauopathy in transgenic mouse brain

    Florence Clavaguera;Tristan Bolmont;R. Anthony Crowther;Dorothee Abramowski

  • Two amyloid precursor protein transgenic mouse models with Alzheimer disease-like pathology

    Christine Sturchler-Pierrat;Dorothee Abramowski;Mairead Duke;Karl-Heinz Wiederhold

  • The amyloid state of proteins in human diseases

    David Eisenberg;Mathias Jucker;Mathias Jucker

  • Self-propagation of pathogenic protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases

    Mathias Jucker;Lary C. Walker;Lary C. Walker

  • Aβ42‐driven cerebral amyloidosis in transgenic mice reveals early and robust pathology

    Rebecca Radde;Tristan Bolmont;Stephan A Kaeser;Janaky Coomaraswamy

  • Exogenous induction of cerebral beta-amyloidogenesis is governed by agent and host.

    Melanie Meyer-Luehmann;Janaky Coomaraswamy;Tristan Bolmont;Tristan Bolmont;Stephan Kaeser

  • Innate immune memory in the brain shapes neurological disease hallmarks

    Ann-Christin Wendeln;Ann-Christin Wendeln;Karoline Degenhardt;Karoline Degenhardt;Lalit Kaurani;Lalit Kaurani;Michael Gertig;Michael Gertig

  • Serum neurofilament dynamics predicts neurodegeneration and clinical progression in presymptomatic Alzheimer’s disease

    Oliver Preische;Oliver Preische;Stephanie A. Schultz;Anja Apel;Anja Apel;Jens Kuhle

  • Reduction of Abeta amyloid pathology in APPPS1 transgenic mice in the absence of gut microbiota.

    T. Harach;N. Marungruang;N. Duthilleul;V. Cheatham

  • Cerebral Hemorrhage After Passive Anti-Aβ Immunotherapy

    M. Pfeifer;S. Boncristiano;L. Bondolfi;A. Stalder

  • Pathogenic protein seeding in Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders.

    Mathias Jucker;Lary C. Walker

  • Peripherally Applied Aβ-Containing Inoculates Induce Cerebral β-Amyloidosis

    Yvonne S. Eisele;Ulrike Obermüller;Ulrike Obermüller;Götz Heilbronner;Götz Heilbronner;Frank Baumann;Frank Baumann

  • Neuron loss in APP transgenic mice

    Michael E. Calhoun;Karl-Heinz Wiederhold;Dorothee Abramowski;Amie L. Phinney

  • Dynamics of the microglial/amyloid interaction indicate a role in plaque maintenance.

    Tristan Bolmont;Florent Haiss;Daniel Eicke;Rebecca Radde

  • A soluble phosphorylated tau signature links tau, amyloid and the evolution of stages of dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease.

    Nicolas R Barthélemy;Yan Li;Nelly Joseph-Mathurin;Brian A Gordon

  • Formation and maintenance of Alzheimer’s disease beta-amyloid plaques in the absence of microglia

    Stefan Grathwohl;R.E. Kälin;T. Bolmont;S. Prokop

  • Abeta is targeted to the vasculature in a mouse model of hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis.

    Martin C Herzig;David T Winkler;Patrick Burgermeister;Michelle Pfeifer;Michelle Pfeifer

  • Neuronal overexpression of mutant amyloid precursor protein results in prominent deposition of cerebrovascular amyloid

    Michael E. Calhoun;Patrick Burgermeister;Amie L. Phinney;Martina Stalder

  • Formation and maintenance of Alzheimer's disease |[beta]|-amyloid plaques in the absence of microglia

    Stefan A Grathwohl;Roland E Kälin;Tristan Bolmont;Tristan Bolmont;Stefan Prokop

  • The benefits and limitations of animal models for translational research in neurodegenerative diseases

    Mathias Jucker

  • Association of microglia with amyloid plaques in brains of APP23 transgenic mice.

    Martina Stalder;Amie Phinney;Alphonse Probst;Bernd Sommer

  • Cryo-EM structure and polymorphism of Aβ amyloid fibrils purified from Alzheimer's brain tissue.

    Marius Kollmer;William Close;Leonie Funk;Jay Rasmussen

  • Expression pattern of the transcription factor Olig2 in response to brain injuries: implications for neuronal repair.

    Annalisa Buffo;Milan R. Vosko;Dilek Ertürk;Gerhard F. Hamann

  • Neurofilament Light Chain in Blood and CSF as Marker of Disease Progression in Mouse Models and in Neurodegenerative Diseases.

    Mehtap Bacioglu;Luis F. Maia;Oliver Preische;Juliane Schelle;Juliane Schelle

  • The Alzheimer's Association external quality control program for cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers

    Niklas Mattsson;Ulf Andreasson;Staffan Persson;Hiroyuki Arai

  • TRANSMISSION AND SPREADING OF TAUOPATHIES IN TRANSGENIC MOUSE BRAIN

    Florence Clavaguera;Bernardino Ghetti;Gabriel Schweighauser;Hiroyasu Akatsu

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald K. Ingram
Donald K. Ingram Louisiana State University
Matthias Staufenbiel
Matthias Staufenbiel University of Tübingen
Lary C. Walker
Lary C. Walker Emory University
Hynda K. Kleinman
Hynda K. Kleinman George Washington University
Anne M. Fagan
Anne M. Fagan Washington University in St. Louis
Peter R. Schofield
Peter R. Schofield Neuroscience Research Australia
Tammie L.S. Benzinger
Tammie L.S. Benzinger Washington University in St. Louis
John C. Morris
John C. Morris Washington University in St. Louis
Randall J. Bateman
Randall J. Bateman Washington University in St. Louis
Ralph N. Martins
Ralph N. Martins Edith Cowan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to a neuroscience career often intersects with related fields like psychology, social work, and therapy. Many students explore these disciplines through flexible online programs that suit busy schedules. Graduates with a neuroscience background may consider advancing their studies in counseling or clinical settings.

For those interested in therapy, pursuing mft masters programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) provides a pathway to professional licensure and client-focused work. Alternatively, an online psychology masters can deepen your understanding of human behavior, opening doors in research, mental health, and education.

Students seeking budget-friendly credentials should explore the cheapest online psychology degree programs, which provide a solid foundation in core topics without excessive cost. Those drawn to social impact roles might consider msw online programs (Master of Social Work), leading to careers in community support, counseling, and advocacy.

Exploring these online degrees can complement a neuroscience background and open diverse, rewarding career pathways in healthcare, therapy, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Mathias Jucker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles