World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 62 2580 2459 1038 960 175 16617

Page Kyle publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Page Kyle between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Page Kyle published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2014. 27 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2014. 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 9 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 13 publications
2007 2025

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Page Kyle: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 4
2008 1
2009 9
2010 3
2011 9
2012 7
2013 19
2014 21
2015 16
2016 12
2017 14
2018 16
2019 8
2020 8
2021 6
2022 20
2023 9
2024 14
2025 13
Total 209
Download as CSV

Page Kyle publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Page Kyle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 175 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444 175
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Page Kyle D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Page Kyle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143 62
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Page Kyle is affiliated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with particular attention to environmental engineering, economics and econometrics, renewable energy, sustainability, ecology, and pollution.

The scientist has contributed to several significant topics within their field, including:

  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture
  • Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies

Page Kyle's recent publications include:

  • "Deep mitigation of CO2 and non-CO2 greenhouse gases toward 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Land-based climate change mitigation measures can affect agricultural markets and food security," 2022, Nature Food
  • "Using ammonia as a shipping fuel could disturb the nitrogen cycle," 2022, Nature Energy
  • "Impacts of water scarcity on agricultural production and electricity generation in the Middle East and North Africa," 2023, Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • "Integrated assessment modeling of a zero-emissions global transportation sector," 2024, Nature Communications

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Energy and Climate Change, Environmental Research Letters, Nature Communications, and Nature Food.

Page Kyle collaborates regularly with several coauthors, including Xin Zhang, Haewon McJeon, Mohamad Hejazi, Chris Vernon, and Jae Edmonds. These collaborations reflect an interdisciplinary approach to studies of climate change, energy systems, and environmental impacts.

Best Publications

  • RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100

    Allison M. Thomson;Katherine V. Calvin;Steven J. Smith;G. Page Kyle

  • Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways

    Alexander Popp;Katherine Calvin;Shinichiro Fujimori;Petr Havlik

  • Climate change effects on agriculture: Economic responses to biophysical shocks

    Gerald C. Nelson;Hugo Valin;Ronald D. Sands;Petr Havlík

  • The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models

    Hugo Valin;Ronald D. Sands;Dominique van der Mensbrugghe;Gerald C. Nelson;Gerald C. Nelson

  • Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy

    Tomoko Hasegawa;Tomoko Hasegawa;Shinichiro Fujimori;Shinichiro Fujimori;Shinichiro Fujimori;Petr Havlík;Hugo Valin

  • Global and regional evolution of short-lived radiatively-active gases and aerosols in the Representative Concentration Pathways

    Jean-François Lamarque;G. Page Kyle;Malte Meinshausen;Keywan Riahi

  • GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems

    Katherine Calvin;Pralit Patel;Leon Clarke;Ghassem Asrar

  • The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality

    Katherine Calvin;Ben Bond-Lamberty;Leon Clarke;James Edmonds

  • Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives

    Nico Bauer;Katherine Calvin;Johannes Emmerling;Johannes Emmerling;Oliver Fricko

  • Land-use change trajectories up to 2050: insights from a global agro-economic model comparison

    Christoph Schmitz;Hans van Meijl;G. Page Kyle;Gerald C. Nelson;Gerald C. Nelson

  • Agriculture and climate change in global scenarios: why don't the models agree

    Gerald C. Nelson;Gerald C. Nelson;Dominique van der Mensbrugghe;Helal Ahammad;Elodie Blanc

  • Why do global long-term scenarios for agriculture differ? An overview of the AgMIP Global Economic Model Intercomparison

    M von Lampe;D Willenbockel;H Ahammad;E Blanc

  • Hotspots of uncertainty in land-use and land-cover change projections: a global-scale model comparison

    Reinhard Prestele;Peter Alexander;Mark D. A. Rounsevell;Almut Arneth

  • China's transportation energy consumption and CO2 emissions from a global perspective

    Xiang Yin;Wenying Chen;Jiyong Eom;Jiyong Eom;Leon E. Clarke

  • Long-term global water projections using six socioeconomic scenarios in an integrated assessment modeling framework

    Mohamad I. Hejazi;James A. Edmonds;Leon E. Clarke;G. Page Kyle

  • Key determinants of global land-use projections

    Elke Stehfest;Willem Jan van Zeist;Hugo Valin;Petr Havlik

  • Long-term transport energy demand and climate policy: Alternative visions on transport decarbonization in energy-economy models

    Robert C. Pietzcker;Thomas Longden;Wenying Chen;Sha Fu

  • An integrated assessment of global and regional water demands for electricity generation to 2095

    Evan G.R. Davies;Page Kyle;James A. Edmonds

  • Land-based climate change mitigation measures can affect agricultural markets and food security

    Unknown

  • Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options

    Alexander Popp;Steven K. Rose;Katherine Calvin;Detlef P. Van Vuuren;Detlef P. Van Vuuren

  • Modeling the effect of climate change on U.S. state-level buildings energy demands in an integrated assessment framework

    Yuyu Zhou;Leon Clarke;Jiyong Eom;Page Kyle

Frequent Co-Authors

Leon Clarke
Leon Clarke University of Maryland, College Park
Katherine Calvin
Katherine Calvin Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Marshall Wise
Marshall Wise Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Mohamad Hejazi
Mohamad Hejazi Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Shinichiro Fujimori
Shinichiro Fujimori Kyoto University
Tomoko Hasegawa
Tomoko Hasegawa Ritsumeikan University
James A. Edmonds
James A. Edmonds Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Hermann Lotze-Campen
Hermann Lotze-Campen Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Petr Havlik
Petr Havlik International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Hugo Valin
Hugo Valin International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens up various educational and career pathways that closely align with the discipline. For students seeking flexible and affordable options, exploring the cheapest online general studies degree programs can provide a solid foundation while keeping costs manageable.

Many prospective learners wonder about the difficulty level of degree programs. If you’re looking for a straightforward academic path, consider programs ranked among the easiest bachelor's degree to get. These can sometimes serve as a stepping stone into more specialized environmental studies or related fields.

For those interested in Earth sciences, pursuing a geoscience online degree offers an excellent opportunity to deepen knowledge of geological processes and environmental impacts—all through flexible distance learning options.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are also increasingly important in environmental careers. Finding the best GIS schools online allows students to master spatial data analysis, a critical tool in environmental planning and management.

Best Scientists Citing Page Kyle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles