World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
62
Citations
16617
World Ranking
2577
National Ranking
1038

Page Kyle publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Page Kyle sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 175 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Page Kyle D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Page Kyle sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Page Kyle is affiliated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with particular attention to environmental engineering, economics and econometrics, renewable energy, sustainability, ecology, and pollution.

The scientist has contributed to several significant topics within their field, including:

  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture
  • Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies

Page Kyle's recent publications include:

  • "Deep mitigation of CO2 and non-CO2 greenhouse gases toward 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Land-based climate change mitigation measures can affect agricultural markets and food security," 2022, Nature Food
  • "Using ammonia as a shipping fuel could disturb the nitrogen cycle," 2022, Nature Energy
  • "Impacts of water scarcity on agricultural production and electricity generation in the Middle East and North Africa," 2023, Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • "Integrated assessment modeling of a zero-emissions global transportation sector," 2024, Nature Communications

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Energy and Climate Change, Environmental Research Letters, Nature Communications, and Nature Food.

Page Kyle collaborates regularly with several coauthors, including Xin Zhang, Haewon McJeon, Mohamad Hejazi, Chris Vernon, and Jae Edmonds. These collaborations reflect an interdisciplinary approach to studies of climate change, energy systems, and environmental impacts.

Best Publications

  • RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100

    Allison M. Thomson;Katherine V. Calvin;Steven J. Smith;G. Page Kyle

  • Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways

    Alexander Popp;Katherine Calvin;Shinichiro Fujimori;Petr Havlik

  • Climate change effects on agriculture: Economic responses to biophysical shocks

    Gerald C. Nelson;Hugo Valin;Ronald D. Sands;Petr Havlík

  • The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models

    Hugo Valin;Ronald D. Sands;Dominique van der Mensbrugghe;Gerald C. Nelson;Gerald C. Nelson

  • Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy

    Tomoko Hasegawa;Tomoko Hasegawa;Shinichiro Fujimori;Shinichiro Fujimori;Shinichiro Fujimori;Petr Havlík;Hugo Valin

  • Global and regional evolution of short-lived radiatively-active gases and aerosols in the Representative Concentration Pathways

    Jean-François Lamarque;G. Page Kyle;Malte Meinshausen;Keywan Riahi

  • GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems

    Katherine Calvin;Pralit Patel;Leon Clarke;Ghassem Asrar

  • The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality

    Katherine Calvin;Ben Bond-Lamberty;Leon Clarke;James Edmonds

  • Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives

    Nico Bauer;Katherine Calvin;Johannes Emmerling;Johannes Emmerling;Oliver Fricko

  • Land-use change trajectories up to 2050: insights from a global agro-economic model comparison

    Christoph Schmitz;Hans van Meijl;G. Page Kyle;Gerald C. Nelson;Gerald C. Nelson

  • Agriculture and climate change in global scenarios: why don't the models agree

    Gerald C. Nelson;Gerald C. Nelson;Dominique van der Mensbrugghe;Helal Ahammad;Elodie Blanc

  • Why do global long-term scenarios for agriculture differ? An overview of the AgMIP Global Economic Model Intercomparison

    M von Lampe;D Willenbockel;H Ahammad;E Blanc

  • Hotspots of uncertainty in land-use and land-cover change projections: a global-scale model comparison

    Reinhard Prestele;Peter Alexander;Mark D. A. Rounsevell;Almut Arneth

  • China's transportation energy consumption and CO2 emissions from a global perspective

    Xiang Yin;Wenying Chen;Jiyong Eom;Jiyong Eom;Leon E. Clarke

  • Long-term global water projections using six socioeconomic scenarios in an integrated assessment modeling framework

    Mohamad I. Hejazi;James A. Edmonds;Leon E. Clarke;G. Page Kyle

  • Key determinants of global land-use projections

    Elke Stehfest;Willem Jan van Zeist;Hugo Valin;Petr Havlik

  • Long-term transport energy demand and climate policy: Alternative visions on transport decarbonization in energy-economy models

    Robert C. Pietzcker;Thomas Longden;Wenying Chen;Sha Fu

  • An integrated assessment of global and regional water demands for electricity generation to 2095

    Evan G.R. Davies;Page Kyle;James A. Edmonds

  • Land-based climate change mitigation measures can affect agricultural markets and food security

    Unknown

  • Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options

    Alexander Popp;Steven K. Rose;Katherine Calvin;Detlef P. Van Vuuren;Detlef P. Van Vuuren

  • Modeling the effect of climate change on U.S. state-level buildings energy demands in an integrated assessment framework

    Yuyu Zhou;Leon Clarke;Jiyong Eom;Page Kyle

Frequent Co-Authors

Leon Clarke
Leon Clarke University of Maryland, College Park
Katherine Calvin
Katherine Calvin Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Marshall Wise
Marshall Wise Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Mohamad Hejazi
Mohamad Hejazi Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Shinichiro Fujimori
Shinichiro Fujimori Kyoto University
Tomoko Hasegawa
Tomoko Hasegawa Ritsumeikan University
James A. Edmonds
James A. Edmonds Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Hermann Lotze-Campen
Hermann Lotze-Campen Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Petr Havlik
Petr Havlik International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Hugo Valin
Hugo Valin International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens up various educational and career pathways that closely align with the discipline. For students seeking flexible and affordable options, exploring the cheapest online general studies degree programs can provide a solid foundation while keeping costs manageable.

Many prospective learners wonder about the difficulty level of degree programs. If you’re looking for a straightforward academic path, consider programs ranked among the easiest bachelor's degree to get. These can sometimes serve as a stepping stone into more specialized environmental studies or related fields.

For those interested in Earth sciences, pursuing a geoscience online degree offers an excellent opportunity to deepen knowledge of geological processes and environmental impacts—all through flexible distance learning options.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are also increasingly important in environmental careers. Finding the best GIS schools online allows students to master spatial data analysis, a critical tool in environmental planning and management.

Best Scientists Citing Page Kyle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles