World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 50 4882 4673 1796 1657 158 12966

Marshall Wise publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marshall Wise between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marshall Wise published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2014. 17 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2014. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 5 publications
1993 2025

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marshall Wise: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 3
1998 3
1999 2
2000 2
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 3
2006 4
2007 7
2008 3
2009 11
2010 6
2011 8
2012 8
2013 10
2014 14
2015 7
2016 3
2017 8
2018 10
2019 9
2020 14
2021 11
2022 11
2023 2
2024 12
2025 5
Total 181
Download as CSV

Marshall Wise publications per year - data summary

  • Marshall Wise, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, has 181 publications recorded across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1993 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2014 and 2020, with 14 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1994, 1995 and 2003, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 33 years in the span carry no publications at all (1996, 2001, 2002 and 2004).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.2 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 41 publications, 23% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1993-2003: 15 publications (1.4 per year); 2004-2014: 74 publications (6.7 per year); 2015-2025: 92 publications (8.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Marshall Wise publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marshall Wise sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 158 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539 158
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Marshall Wise publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 66 ranges running from 41–50 to 690+ publications.
  • Marshall Wise, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, records 158 publications - the 46th percentile of the discipline.
  • 46% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Marshall Wise, and about 54% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 161–170 publications range, and Marshall Wise ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 121–130 publications, holding 617 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 67% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 690 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Marshall Wise D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marshall Wise sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263 50
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Marshall Wise D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 30 to 126+ D-Index.
  • Marshall Wise, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, records 50 D-Index - the 50th percentile of the discipline.
  • 50% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Marshall Wise, and about 50% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 51 D-Index range, and Marshall Wise ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 45 D-Index, holding 348 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more, 92 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Marshall Wise is affiliated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in the United States, focusing primarily on Environmental Science.

Their research spans multiple subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecology.

The main topics of their scholarly work are:

  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Global Energy and Sustainability Research
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture

Marshall Wise has contributed to a number of peer-reviewed articles, including recent publications such as:

  • Global urban growth between 1870 and 2100 from integrated high resolution mapped data and urban dynamic modeling, 2021, Communications Earth & Environment
  • Impacts of long-term temperature change and variability on electricity investments, 2021, Nature Communications
  • EMF-33 insights on bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), 2020, Climatic Change
  • Trade-offs in land-based carbon removal measures under 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures, 2024, Nature Communications
  • GCAM-USA v5.3_water_dispatch: integrated modeling of subnational US energy, water, and land systems within a global framework, 2022, Geoscientific Model Development

Frequent co-authors in Marshall Wise's publications include:

  • Pralit Patel
  • Katherine Calvin
  • Xin Zhao
  • Gokul Iyer
  • Jae Edmonds

Their research has been published repeatedly in several venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Climatic Change
  • Nature Communications
  • Climate Change Economics

Best Publications

  • RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100

    Allison M. Thomson;Katherine V. Calvin;Steven J. Smith;G. Page Kyle

  • Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy.

    Marshall A. Wise;Katherine V. Calvin;Allison M. Thomson;Leon E. Clarke

  • Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways

    Alexander Popp;Katherine Calvin;Shinichiro Fujimori;Petr Havlik

  • International Equity and Differentiation in Global Warming Policy

    Adam Rose;Brandt Stevens;Jae Edmonds;Marshall Wise

  • GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems

    Katherine Calvin;Pralit Patel;Leon Clarke;Ghassem Asrar

  • The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality

    Katherine Calvin;Ben Bond-Lamberty;Leon Clarke;James Edmonds

  • Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives

    Nico Bauer;Katherine Calvin;Johannes Emmerling;Johannes Emmerling;Oliver Fricko

  • Land-use change trajectories up to 2050: insights from a global agro-economic model comparison

    Christoph Schmitz;Hans van Meijl;G. Page Kyle;Gerald C. Nelson;Gerald C. Nelson

  • The objECTS Framework for integrated Assessment: Hybrid Modeling of Transportation

    Son H. Kim;James A. Edmonds;Joshua Lurz;Steven J. Smith

  • Long-term global water projections using six socioeconomic scenarios in an integrated assessment modeling framework

    Mohamad I. Hejazi;James A. Edmonds;Leon E. Clarke;G. Page Kyle

  • Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options

    Alexander Popp;Steven K. Rose;Katherine Calvin;Detlef P. Van Vuuren;Detlef P. Van Vuuren

  • Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison

    Nico Bauer;Steven K. Rose;Shinichiro Fujimori;Shinichiro Fujimori;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Detlef P. van Vuuren

  • Assessing uncertainties in land cover projections

    Peter Alexander;Peter Alexander;Reinhard Prestele;Peter H Verburg;Almut Arneth

  • An Integrated Assessment of Climate Change and the Accelerated Introduction of Advanced Energy Technologies - An Application of MiniCAM 1.0

    Jae Edmonds;Marshall Wise;Hugh Pitcher;Richard Richels

  • Integrated assessment of global water scarcity over the 21st century under multiple climate change mitigation policies

    Mohamad I. Hejazi;James A. Edmonds;Leon E. Clarke;G. Page Kyle

  • Large-scale utilization of biomass energy and carbon dioxide capture and storage in the transport and electricity sectors under stringent CO2 concentration limit scenarios

    Patrick Luckow;Marshall A. Wise;James J. Dooley;Son H. Kim

  • 2.6: Limiting climate change to 450 ppm CO2 equivalent in the 21st century

    Katherine V. Calvin;James A. Edmonds;Benjamin Bond-Lamberty;Leon E. Clarke

  • Impacts of increased bioenergy demand on global food markets: an AgMIP economic model intercomparison

    H. Lotze-Campen;M. von Lampe;P. Kyle;S. Fujimori

  • Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targets

    Katherine V. Calvin;Marshall A. Wise;G. Page Kyle;Pralit L. Patel

  • Global economic consequences of deploying bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)

    Matteo Muratori;Katherine Calvin;Marshall Wise;Page Kyle

  • Carbon coalitions: the cost and effectiveness of energy agreements to alter trajectories of atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions

    Jae Edmonds;Marshall Wise;David W Barns

Frequent Co-Authors

Katherine Calvin
Katherine Calvin Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Leon Clarke
Leon Clarke University of Maryland, College Park
James A. Edmonds
James A. Edmonds Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Page Kyle
Page Kyle Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Mohamad Hejazi
Mohamad Hejazi Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Detlef P. van Vuuren
Detlef P. van Vuuren Utrecht University
Shinichiro Fujimori
Shinichiro Fujimori Kyoto University
Allison M. Thomson
Allison M. Thomson University of Maryland, College Park
Steven J. Smith
Steven J. Smith Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Petr Havlik
Petr Havlik International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Public administration plays a crucial role in environmental policy and resource management. Earning one of the best online masters in public administration equips graduates with leadership skills necessary for advancing sustainability initiatives in government and nonprofit sectors.

Sociology also intersects with environmental studies, particularly in understanding human-environment interactions and social impacts of ecological change. Pursuing a bachelors degree in sociology online helps students analyze community behaviors and advocate for environmental justice.

Educators focusing on environmental literacy and policy benefit from advanced degrees such as an EdD. Many students seek flexible programs, which is why options like an edd without dissertation are increasingly popular. These programs streamline educational leadership training while minimizing lengthy research requirements.

For those aiming at the highest levels of academic and professional advancement, the best online eds to edd programs offer seamless transitions from master's to doctoral degrees in education, supporting expertise in environmental education policy and administration.

Best Scientists Citing Marshall Wise

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles