World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
71
Citations
22687
World Ranking
6552
National Ranking
159

David R. Booth publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Booth sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 212 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David R. Booth D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Booth sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David R. Booth is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their research spans multiple disciplines primarily within Medicine, Immunology and Microbiology, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's recent publications include the following works:

  • HBV vaccination and HBV infection induces HBV-specific natural killer cell memory (2020, Gut)
  • The interaction of Multiple Sclerosis risk loci with Epstein-Barr virus phenotypes implicates the virus in pathogenesis (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • The interaction of Epstein-Barr virus encoded transcription factor EBNA2 with multiple sclerosis risk loci is dependent on the risk genotype (2021, EBioMedicine)
  • The Interaction of Human and Epstein-Barr Virus miRNAs with Multiple Sclerosis Risk Loci (2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  • Genetic mapping across autoimmune diseases reveals shared associations and mechanisms (2024, Nature Genetics)

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Viral-associated cancers and disorders
  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Polyomavirus and related diseases

Their subfields of study encompass:

  • Immunology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Oncology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Plant Science

Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • Genes and Immunity
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Genetics

David R. Booth collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Grant P. Parnell
  • Stephen D. Schibeci
  • Nicole Fewings
  • Lawrence T. C. Ong
  • Ali Afrasiabi

Best Publications

  • Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis

    Stephen Sawcer;Garrett Hellenthal;Matti Pirinen;Chris C. A. Spencer

  • IL28B is associated with response to chronic hepatitis C interferon-alpha and ribavirin therapy

    Vijayaprakash Suppiah;Max Moldovan;Golo Ahlenstiel;Thomas Berg

  • Analysis of immune-related loci identifies 48 new susceptibility variants for multiple sclerosis

    Ashley H. Beecham;Nikolaos A. Patsopoulos;Nikolaos A. Patsopoulos;Dionysia K. Xifara;Mary F. Davis

  • Instability, unfolding and aggregation of human lysozyme variants underlying amyloid fibrillogenesis

    David R. Booth;Margaret Sunde;Vittorio Bellotti;Vittorio Bellotti;Carol V. Robinson

  • Human lysozyme gene mutations cause hereditary systemic amyloidosis

    M. B. Pepys;P. N. Hawkins;D. R. Booth;D. M. Vigushin

  • Misdiagnosis of hereditary amyloidosis as AL (primary) amyloidosis.

    Helen J Lachmann;David R Booth;Susanne E Booth;Alison Bybee

  • Genome-wide association study identifies new multiple sclerosis susceptibility loci on chromosomes 12 and 20

    Melanie Bahlo;David R Booth;Simon A Broadley;Matthew A Brown;Matthew A Brown

  • Association of mutations in the NALP3/CIAS1/PYPAF1 gene with a broad phenotype including recurrent fever, cold sensitivity, sensorineural deafness, and AA amyloidosis.

    Ebun Aganna;Fabio Martinon;Philip N. Hawkins;John B. Ross

  • Clinical and subclinical inflammation in patients with familial Mediterranean fever and in heterozygous carriers of MEFV mutations

    H. J. Lachmann;B. Şengül;T. U. Yavuzşen;D. R. Booth

  • Class II HLA interactions modulate genetic risk for multiple sclerosis

    L Moutsianas;L Jostins;A H Beecham;A T Dilthey

  • A high-density screen for linkage in multiple sclerosis.

    Sawcer S;Ban M;Maranian M;Yeo Tw

  • MicroRNAs miR-17 and miR-20a Inhibit T Cell Activation Genes and Are Under-Expressed in MS Whole Blood

    Mathew B. Cox;Murray J. Cairns;Kaushal S. Gandhi;Adam P. Carroll

  • Country as the primary risk factor for renal amyloidosis in familial Mediterranean fever.

    Isabelle Touitou;Tamara Sarkisian;Myrna Medlej‐Hashim;Mehmet Tunca

  • Amyloid P component. A critical review

    M B. Pepys;D. R. Booth;W. L. Hutchinson;J. R. Gallimore

  • Potential role for interleukin-28B genotype in treatment decision-making in recent hepatitis C virus infection.

    Jason Grebely;Kathy Petoumenos;Margaret Hellard;Margaret Hellard;Gail V. Matthews;Gail V. Matthews

  • The role of the CD58 locus in multiple sclerosis

    Philip L. De Jager;Clare Baecher-Allan;Lisa M. Maier;Ariel T. Arthur

  • Antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein in bilateral and recurrent optic neuritis

    Sudarshini Ramanathan;Stephen W. Reddel;Andrew Henderson;John D.E. Parratt

  • The genetic basis of autosomal dominant familial Mediterranean fever.

    D R Booth;J D Gillmore;H J Lachmann;S E Booth

  • Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Variants Associated With Progression of Liver Fibrosis From HCV Infection

    Etienne Patin;Etienne Patin;Zoltán Kutalik;Zoltán Kutalik;Julien Guergnon;Stéphanie Bibert

  • Hepatitis C pharmacogenetics: State of the art in 2010†‡§

    Nezam H. Afdhal;John G. McHutchison;Stefan Zeuzem;Alessandra Mangia

Frequent Co-Authors

Graeme J. Stewart
Graeme J. Stewart University of Sydney
Jacob George
Jacob George University of Sydney
Stephen Sawcer
Stephen Sawcer University of Cambridge
David A. Hafler
David A. Hafler Yale University
Stephen L. Hauser
Stephen L. Hauser University of California, San Francisco
Jorge R. Oksenberg
Jorge R. Oksenberg University of California, San Francisco
An Goris
An Goris KU Leuven
Jan Hillert
Jan Hillert Karolinska Institute
Hanne F. Harbo
Hanne F. Harbo Oslo University Hospital
Lisa F. Barcellos
Lisa F. Barcellos University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a variety of specialized online degrees and rewarding career pathways. For example, students interested in patient care can pursue an online asn degree to become a registered nurse. This pathway combines foundational sciences with practical clinical knowledge.

If you’re more interested in the science of nutrition and health, consider earning a nutritionist degree online. This degree blends biology with nutrition, preparing graduates to work in clinical, community, or wellness settings.

For those aiming for leadership in healthcare, top cahme-accredited mha programs offer training in healthcare management. A background in biology or biochemistry can enhance your understanding of healthcare systems and patient needs.

Advancement to high-level clinical roles is also possible through certain dnp online no clinicals options. These flexible programs allow working professionals to further their expertise and leadership skills without traditional on-campus requirements.

No matter your interest, combining biology or biochemistry with an online degree can lead to diverse and impactful careers in the health sciences.

Best Scientists Citing David R. Booth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles