World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hugh J. MacIsaac

Hugh J. MacIsaac

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
86
Citations
24479
World Ranking
598
National Ranking
36

Hugh J. MacIsaac publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugh J. MacIsaac sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 272 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Hugh J. MacIsaac D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugh J. MacIsaac sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hugh J. MacIsaac is affiliated with the University of Windsor in Canada and specializes in Environmental Science. Their research predominantly explores the impacts and dynamics of invasive species within aquatic ecosystems.

The main fields of study for MacIsaac include:

  • Environmental Science

Subfields of study involve:

  • Ecology
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Molecular Biology
  • Oceanography

MacIsaac's work focuses on several specific topics:

  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Marine and Coastal Ecosystems
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Frequent publication venues for MacIsaac's research include:

  • Diversity and Distributions
  • Harmful Algae
  • Biological Invasions
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

The scientist has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Xuexiu Chang
  • Aibin Zhan
  • Anthony Ricciardi
  • Runbing Xu
  • Zhiqiang Xia

Recent papers published by MacIsaac and their co-authors demonstrate a focus on invasion science and ecological impacts:

  • Drivers of future alien species impacts: An expert-based assessment, 2020, Global Change Biology
  • Four priority areas to advance invasion science in the face of rapid environmental change, 2020, Environmental Reviews
  • On the RIP: using Relative Impact Potential to assess the ecological impacts of invasive alien species, 2020, NeoBiota
  • Vector control reduces the rate of species invasion in the world's largest freshwater ecosystem, 2022, Conservation Letters
  • Impacts of climate change on geographical distributions of invasive ascidians, 2020, Marine Environmental Research

Best Publications

  • Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis

    Robert I. Colautti;Anthony Ricciardi;Igor A. Grigorovich;Hugh J. MacIsaac

  • Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management.

    David M. Lodge;Susan Williams;Hugh J. MacIsaac;Keith R. Hayes

  • A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species

    Unknown

  • Potential Abiotic and Biotic Impacts of Zebra Mussels on the Inland Waters of North America

    Unknown

  • Invasion Science: A Horizon Scan of Emerging Challenges and Opportunities

    Anthony Ricciardi;Tim M. Blackburn;Tim M. Blackburn;James T. Carlton;Jaimie T.A. Dick

  • Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada

    Robert I Colautti;Sarah A Bailey;Colin D. A. van Overdijk;Keri Amundsen

  • High sensitivity of 454 pyrosequencing for detection of rare species in aquatic communities

    Aibin Zhan;Aibin Zhan;Martin Hulák;Francisco Sylvester;Xiaoting Huang

  • Advancing impact prediction and hypothesis testing in invasion ecology using a comparative functional response approach

    Jaimie T. A. Dick;Mhairi E. Alexander;Jonathan M. Jeschke;Anthony Ricciardi

  • Propagule Pressure: A Null Model for Biological Invasions

    Unknown

  • Tackling invasive alien species in Europe: the top 20 issues

    Joe M. Caffrey;Jan-Robert Baars;Jenny H. Barbour;Pieter Boets

  • Popularity and propagule pressure: determinants of introduction and establishment of aquarium fish

    Ian C. Duggan;Corinne A. M. Rixon;Hugh J. MacIsaac

  • Biological invasions: are they dependent on disturbance?

    Unknown

  • Invasion risks posed by the aquarium trade and live fish markets on the Laurentian Great Lakes

    Corinne A.M. Rixon;Ian C. Duggan;Nathalie M.N. Bergeron;Anthony Ricciardi

  • Bridging Troubled Waters: Biological Invasions, Transoceanic Shipping, and the Laurentian Great Lakes

    Kristen T. Holeck;Edward L. Mills;Hugh J. MacISAAC;Margaret R. Dochoda

  • Impacts of Biological Invasions on Freshwater Ecosystems

    Anthony Ricciardi;Hugh J. Macisaac

  • Modelling local and long-distance dispersal of invasive emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera) in North America

    Jim R. Muirhead;Brian Leung;Colin van Overdijk;David W. Kelly

  • Ballast-mediated animal introductions in the Laurentian Great Lakes: retrospective and prospective analyses

    Igor A. Grigorovich;Robert I. Colautti;Edward L. Mills;Kristen Holeck

  • Drivers of future alien species impacts: An expert-based assessment.

    Franz Essl;Franz Essl;Bernd Lenzner;Sven Bacher;Sarah Bailey

  • Invader Relative Impact Potential: a new metric to understand and predict the ecological impacts of existing, emerging and future invasive alien species

    Jaimie T.A. Dick;Ciaran Laverty;Jack J. Lennon;Daniel Barrios-O'Neill

  • Contrasting patterns in genetic diversity following multiple invasions of fresh and brackish waters.

    David W. Kelly;James R. Muirhead;Daniel D. Heath;Hugh J. Macisaac

  • Predicting invasion risk using measures of introduction effort and environmental niche models.

    Leif-Matthias Herborg;Leif-Matthias Herborg;Christopher L. Jerde;David M. Lodge;Gregory M. Ruiz

  • Identifying the source of species invasions: sampling intensity vs. genetic diversity

    Jim R. Muirhead;Derek K. Gray;David W. Kelly;Sandra M. Ellis

  • Invasion of Lake Ontario by the Ponto–Caspian predatory cladoceran Cercopagis pengoi

    Hugh J MacIsaac;Igor A Grigorovich;James A Hoyle;Norman D Yan

  • Fouling mussels (Dreissena spp.) colonize soft sediments in Lake Erie and facilitate benthic invertebrates

    Andrew Bially;Hugh J. Macisaac

  • Filtering impacts of larval and sessile zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) in western Lake Erie

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah A. Bailey
Sarah A. Bailey Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Elizabeta Briski
Elizabeta Briski GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Melania E. Cristescu
Melania E. Cristescu McGill University
Aibin Zhan
Aibin Zhan Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jaimie T. A. Dick
Jaimie T. A. Dick Queen's University Belfast
Anthony Ricciardi
Anthony Ricciardi McGill University
Daniel D. Heath
Daniel D. Heath University of Windsor
Gregory M. Ruiz
Gregory M. Ruiz Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
Ross N. Cuthbert
Ross N. Cuthbert Queen's University Belfast
André Rochon
André Rochon Université du Québec à Rimouski

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to various online degree options that fit different backgrounds and career goals. For students interested in integrating biology with healthcare, there are flexible nursing pathways such as the 6 month rn to bsn program designed for registered nurses seeking a fast-track bachelor’s degree.

Those holding an associate degree in nursing may consider an adn to fnp bridge program, which paves the way toward becoming a family nurse practitioner. Students without a nursing background but interested in the field can explore online direct entry msn programs designed specifically for non-nurses.

When choosing between top institutions, prospective students often compare features, curriculum, and reputation of schools like chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program to find the best fit for their needs.

Whether your interest is in healthcare, research, or conservation, these online programs offer flexible entry points and advancement pathways for those passionate about the life sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Hugh J. MacIsaac

Trending Scientists