World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 57 1806 1625 326 295 326 11213

David Best publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Best between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Best published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 13 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2025. 52 of the 391 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2025. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 41 publications
1996 2025

391 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Best: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 3
1998 7
1999 7
2000 11
2001 11
2002 12
2003 11
2004 7
2005 10
2006 6
2007 9
2008 14
2009 12
2010 8
2011 8
2012 12
2013 15
2014 23
2015 17
2016 23
2017 24
2018 18
2019 27
2020 11
2021 16
2022 9
2023 7
2024 11
2025 41
Total 391
Download as CSV

David Best publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Best sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 324–333 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 326 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81 326
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

David Best D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Best sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129 57
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

David Best is a researcher primarily affiliated with the University of Derby in the United Kingdom. Their academic work spans multiple fields of study including Health Professions, Medicine, and Social Sciences, with particular focus on General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their research covers a range of topics, notably Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Homelessness and Social Issues, and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes. Other areas of focus include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis, Health disparities and outcomes, Schizophrenia research and treatment, and Community Health and Development.

David Best has published frequently in several key journals. The most common publication venues include:

  • Drugs Education Prevention and Policy
  • Addiction Research & Theory
  • Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy
  • Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly
  • International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

Their recent notable publications are:

  • The science of recovery capital: where do we go from here? (2021) in Addiction
  • Comparing three stages of addiction recovery: long-term recovery and its relation to housing problems, crime, occupation situation, and substance use (2020) in Drugs Education Prevention and Policy
  • Measuring capital in active addiction and recovery: the development of the strengths and barriers recovery scale (SABRS) (2020) in Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy
  • Putting 'Justice' in Recovery Capital: Yarning about Hopes and Futures with Young People in Detention (2020) in International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy
  • The Strengths and Barriers Recovery Scale (SABRS): Relationships Matter in Building Strengths and Overcoming Barriers (2021) in Frontiers in Psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David Best include:

  • Wouter Vanderplasschen
  • Arun Sondhi
  • David Patton
  • Mulka Nisic
  • Thomas F. Martinelli

Best Publications

  • The Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP):A brief instrument for assessing treatment outcome.

    John Marsden;Michael Gossop;Duncan Stewart;David Best

  • Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: the social identity model of recovery (SIMOR)

    David Best;Melinda Beckwith;Catherine Haslam;S. Alexander Haslam

  • Loss of tolerance and overdose mortality after inpatient opiate detoxification: follow up study

    John Strang;Jim McCambridge;David Best;Tracy Beswick

  • The Assessment of Recovery Capital: properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths

    Teodora Groshkova;David William Best;William White

  • Breaking good: breaking ties with social groups may be good for recovery from substance misuse

    Genevieve A. Dingle;Claire Stark;Tegan Cruwys;David Best

  • Overdose training and take‐home naloxone for opiate users: prospective cohort study of impact on knowledge and attitudes and subsequent management of overdoses

    J Strang;Victoria Manning;Soraya Mayet;David William Best

  • Preventing opiate overdose fatalities with take-home naloxone: pre-launch study of possible impact and acceptability

    John Strang;Beverly Powis;David Best;Louisa Vingoe

  • New estimates of the number of children living with substance misusing parents: results from UK national household surveys

    Victoria Manning;David William Best;Nathan Faulkner;Emily Titherington

  • Mapping the recovery stories of drinkers and drug users in Glasgow: Quality of life and its associations with measures of recovery capital

    David Best;Jane Gow;Tony Knox;Avril Taylor

  • After 30 years of dissemination, have we achieved sustained practice change in motivational interviewing?

    Kate Hall;Kate Hall;Petra K. Staiger;Angela Simpson;Angela Simpson;David Best;David Best;David Best

  • Excessive drinking and other problem behaviours among 14-16 year old schoolchildren.

    David Best;Victoria Manning;Michael Gossop;Samantha Gross

  • Development and validation of a Brief Assessment of Recovery Capital (BARC-10) for alcohol and drug use disorder

    Corrie L. Vilsaint;John F. Kelly;Brandon G. Bergman;Teodora Groshkova

  • Test–retest reliability of the Severity of Dependence Scale

    Michael Gossop;David Best;John Marsden;John Strang

  • Is attendance at Alcoholics Anonymous meetings after inpatient treatment related to improved outcomes? A 6-month follow-up study.

    Michael Gossop;Jennifer Harris;David Best;Lan Ho Man

  • Breaking the habit: a retrospective analysis of desistance factors among formerly problematic heroin users

    David William Best;Safeena Ghufran;Ed Day;Rajashree Ray

  • Recovery capital pathways: Modelling the components of recovery wellbeing.

    Ivan Cano;David Best;Michael Edwards;John Lehman

  • Social identity, social networks and recovery capital in emerging adulthood: A pilot study

    Emily Mawson;David William Best;David William Best;David William Best;Melinda Beckwith;Genevieve Anita Dingle

  • “Is it me or should my friends take the credit?” The role of social networks and social identity in recovery from addiction

    Ramez Bathish;Ramez Bathish;David Best;David Best;Michael Savic;Melinda Beckwith

  • Strategies to facilitate integrated care for people with alcohol and other drug problems: a systematic review

    Michael Savic;Michael Savic;David Best;Victoria Manning;Victoria Manning;Daniel Lubman;Daniel Lubman

  • Challenging the brain disease model of addiction: European launch of the addiction theory network

    Nick Heather;David Best;Anna Kawalek;Matt Field

  • Crime and Expenditure amongst Polydrug Misusers Seeking Treatment : The Connection between Prescribed Methadone and Crack Use, and Criminal Involvement

    David Best;Clare Sidwell;Michael Gossop;Jenny Harris

  • Accuracy of perceptions of hepatitis B and C status: cross sectional investigation of opiate addicts in treatment

    David Best;Alison Noble;Emily Finch;Michael Gossop

Frequent Co-Authors

John Strang
John Strang King's College London
Dan I. Lubman
Dan I. Lubman Monash University
Michael Gossop
Michael Gossop King's College London
Victoria Manning
Victoria Manning Monash University
Petra K. Staiger
Petra K. Staiger Deakin University
William L. White
William L. White Yale University
Genevieve A. Dingle
Genevieve A. Dingle University of Queensland
John Marsden
John Marsden King's College London
Catherine Haslam
Catherine Haslam University of Queensland
Michael Farrell
Michael Farrell University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in shaping society, supporting mental health, or driving positive social change? Numerous online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities can kickstart your career while offering flexibility and affordability. Several universities now provide cacrep-accredited online counseling programs, ideal for students aiming to become licensed professional counselors or mental health advocates.

For those passionate about fostering healthy relationships and family dynamics, online marriage and family therapy masters programs can prepare graduates for rewarding roles in both clinical and community settings. Likewise, an affordable online psychology degree is a popular gateway for careers in research, human resources, education, and more.

If your passion lies in social work or advocacy, exploring the msw options makes it easier than ever to enter graduate study and progress towards a licensed social worker role. Each of these flexible online pathways can empower you to make a difference—both in your career and in communities that need support most.

Best Scientists Citing David Best

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles