World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
77
Citations
32619
World Ranking
1108
National Ranking
484

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
77
Citations
32361
World Ranking
4689
National Ranking
2271

John A. Gamon publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Gamon sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 207 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

John A. Gamon D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Gamon sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

John A. Gamon is affiliated with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the United States and specializes in Environmental Science, with a research focus that spans several interconnected subfields. Their work predominantly addresses Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Ecological Modeling.

The scientist's main topics of research include Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics.

John A. Gamon's recent publications reflect a focus on vegetation, ecological monitoring, and environmental sensing. Selected papers include:

  • A unified vegetation index for quantifying the terrestrial biosphere, 2021, Science Advances
  • Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites, 2021, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Leaf reflectance spectra capture the evolutionary history of seed plants, 2020, New Phytologist
  • Multi-temporal assessment of grassland α- and β-diversity using hyperspectral imaging, 2020, Ecological Applications
  • Recent Advances Toward Transparent Methane Emissions Monitoring: A Review, 2022, Environmental Science & Technology

Their research has been published extensively in several scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • New Phytologist
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Global Change Biology

Collaborations are a significant part of John A. Gamon's research output. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ran Wang
  • Jeannine Cavender-Bares
  • Hamed Gholizadeh
  • Philip A. Townsend
  • Anna K. Schweiger

Best Publications

  • Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages

    Daniel A Sims;John A Gamon

  • A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency

    J.A. Gamon;J. Peñuelas;C.B. Field

  • The photochemical reflectance index: an optical indicator of photosynthetic radiation use efficiency across species, functional types, and nutrient levels.

    J. A. Gamon;L. Serrano;J. S. Surfus

  • Relationships Between NDVI, Canopy Structure, and Photosynthesis in Three Californian Vegetation Types

    John A. Gamon;Christopher B. Field;Michael L. Goulden;Kevin L. Griffin

  • Reflectance indices associated with physiological changes in nitrogen- and water-limited sunflower leaves☆

    J. Peñuelas;J.A. Gamon;A.L. Fredeen;J. Merino

  • Assessing leaf pigment content and activity with a reflectometer

    J. A. Gamon;J. S. Surfus

  • Remote sensing of vegetation and land-cover change in Arctic Tundra Ecosystems

    Douglas A. Stow;Allen Hope;David McGuire;David Verbyla

  • Assessment of photosynthetic radiation-use efficiency with spectral reflectance.

    Josep Peñuelas;Iolanda Filella;John A. Gamon

  • Retrieval of foliar information about plant pigment systems from high resolution spectroscopy

    Susan L. Ustin;Anatoly A. Gitelson;Stéphane Jacquemoud;Michael Schaepman

  • Estimation of vegetation water content and photosynthetic tissue area from spectral reflectance: a comparison of indices based on liquid water and chlorophyll absorption features

    Daniel A Sims;John A Gamon

  • Using Imaging Spectroscopy to Study Ecosystem Processes and Properties

    Susan L. Ustin;Dar A. Roberts;John A. Gamon;Gregory P. Asner

  • The photochemical reflectance index (PRI) and the remote sensing of leaf, canopy and ecosystem radiation use efficiencies: A review and meta-analysis

    Martín F. Garbulsky;Martín F. Garbulsky;Josep Peñuelas;John Gamon;Yoshio Inoue

  • Remote sensing of plant functional types

    Susan L. Ustin;John A. Gamon

  • A unified vegetation index for quantifying the terrestrial biosphere.

    Gustau Camps-Valls;Manuel Campos-Taberner;Álvaro Moreno-Martínez;Álvaro Moreno-Martínez;Sophia Walther

  • Research priorities for neotropical dry forests

    G. Arturo Sánchez-Azofeifa;Mauricio Quesada;Jon Paul Rodríguez;Jafet M. Nassar

  • Succession and management of tropical dry forests in the Americas: review and new perspectives.

    Mauricio Quesada;G. Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa;Mariana Alvarez-Añorve;Kathryn E. Stoner

  • Remote sensing of the xanthophyll cycle and chlorophyll fluorescence in sunflower leaves and canopies

    J. A. Gamon;C. B. Field;W. Bilger;O. Björkman

  • Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites

    Housen Chu;Xiangzhong Luo;Xiangzhong Luo;Zutao Ouyang;W. Stephen Chan

  • Deriving water content of chaparral vegetation from AVIRIS data

    Lydia Serrano;Susan L. Ustin;Dar A. Roberts;John A. Gamon

  • Site‐level evaluation of satellite‐based global terrestrial gross primary production and net primary production monitoring

    David P. Turner;William D. Ritts;Warren B. Cohen;Thomas K. Maeirsperger

  • Assessing community type, plant biomass, pigment composition, and photosynthetic efficiency of aquatic vegetation from spectral reflectance

    Josep Peñuelas;John A Gamon;Kevin L Griffin;Christopher B Field

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeannine Cavender-Bares
Jeannine Cavender-Bares University of Minnesota
Christopher B. Field
Christopher B. Field Stanford University
Daniel A. Sims
Daniel A. Sims Indiana University
Susan L. Ustin
Susan L. Ustin University of California, Davis
Dar A. Roberts
Dar A. Roberts University of California, Santa Barbara
Philip A. Townsend
Philip A. Townsend University of Wisconsin–Madison
Josep Peñuelas
Josep Peñuelas Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), CSIC
Walter C. Oechel
Walter C. Oechel San Diego State University
David S. Hik
David S. Hik Simon Fraser University
Iolanda Filella
Iolanda Filella Autonomous University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career opportunities, and pursuing related online degrees can enhance your qualifications. For those interested in public administration and environmental policy, exploring mpa one year programs offers a focused path to gain management skills quickly.

Understanding societal impacts on the environment is also crucial. Online options like online bachelors degree programs in sociology provide foundational knowledge in social behavior and research methods that complement environmental studies.

For professionals aiming to lead in education or community outreach within environmental fields, advanced degrees matter. There are innovative online ed d programs without dissertation requirements, allowing for flexible completion while developing leadership capabilities.

If you are considering a deeper dive into educational leadership related to environmental education, viewing the best eds to edd programs can guide your decision toward accredited and reputable online offerings.

These pathways emphasize flexibility and specialization, enabling students and professionals in Environmental Sciences to tailor their learning and career growth effectively.

Best Scientists Citing John A. Gamon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles