World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
5170
World Ranking
9439
National Ranking
3990

Sara N. Burke publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sara N. Burke sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 99 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sara N. Burke D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sara N. Burke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sara N. Burke is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within neuroscience and medicine, with a significant focus on cognitive neuroscience and related physiological processes.

The scientist's primary areas of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine

Within these disciplines, their work further specializes in subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Physiology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology
  • Neurology

The main topics covered by their research encompass:

  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Dietary Effects on Health
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Sara N. Burke has authored multiple recent papers, including:

  • "Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime" (2022) published in Clinical Pharmacokinetics
  • "Twelve Months of Time-Restricted Feeding Improves Cognition and Alters Microbiome Composition Independent of Macronutrient Composition" (2022) published in Nutrients
  • "Metabolic switching is impaired by aging and facilitated by ketosis independent of glycogen" (2020) published in Aging
  • "Acute vagus nerve stimulation enhances reversal learning in rats" (2021) published in Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • "Rodent mnemonic similarity task performance requires the prefrontal cortex" (2021) published in Hippocampus

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Sara N. Burke include:

  • Andrew P. Maurer
  • Abbi R. Hernandez
  • Jennifer L. Bizon
  • Sarah D. Lovett
  • Jack P. Kennedy

Publication venues where their work frequently appears are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Physiology
  • Nutrients

Best Publications

  • Neural plasticity in the ageing brain

    Sara N. Burke;Carol A. Barnes

  • Senescent synapses and hippocampal circuit dynamics

    Sara N. Burke;Carol A. Barnes

  • Pattern Separation Deficits May Contribute to Age-Associated Recognition Impairments

    Sara N. Burke;Jenelle L. Wallace;Saman Nematollahi;Ajay R. Uprety

  • Phase precession in hippocampal interneurons showing strong functional coupling to individual pyramidal cells.

    Andrew P. Maurer;Stephen L. Cowen;Sara N. Burke;Carol A. Barnes

  • Organization of hippocampal cell assemblies based on theta phase precession.

    Andrew P. Maurer;Stephen L. Cowen;Sara N. Burke;Carol A. Barnes

  • The influence of objects on place field expression and size in distal hippocampal CA1.

    Sara N. Burke;Andrew P. Maurer;Saman Nematollahi;Ajay R. Uprety

  • Sequence reactivation in the hippocampus is impaired in aged rats.

    Jason L. Gerrard;Sara N. Burke;Bruce L. McNaughton;Carol A. Barnes

  • A Ketogenic Diet Improves Cognition and Has Biochemical Effects in Prefrontal Cortex That Are Dissociable From Hippocampus.

    Abbi R. Hernandez;Caesar M. Hernandez;Keila Campos;Leah Truckenbrod

  • Differential encoding of behavior and spatial context in deep and superficial layers of the neocortex.

    Sara N. Burke;Monica K. Chawla;Marsha R. Penner;Brynne E. Crowell

  • Representation of three-dimensional objects by the rat perirhinal cortex.

    S.N. Burke;A.P. Maurer;A.L. Hartzell;S. Nematollahi

  • 3D-catFISH: a system for automated quantitative three-dimensional compartmental analysis of temporal gene transcription activity imaged by fluorescence in situ hybridization

    Monica K. Chawla;Gang Lin;Kathy Olson;Almira Vazdarjanova

  • Characterizing cognitive aging of recognition memory and related processes in animal models and in humans.

    Sara N. Burke;Lee Ryan;Carol A. Barnes

  • Shared Functions of Perirhinal and Parahippocampal Cortices: Implications for Cognitive Aging.

    Sara N. Burke;Leslie S. Gaynor;Carol A. Barnes;Russell M. Bauer

  • Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime

    Unknown

  • Cholinergic modulation of covert attention in the rat

    Catherine Stewart;Sara Burke;Richard Marrocco

  • Movement Enhances the Nonlinearity of Hippocampal Theta.

    Alex Sheremet;Sara N. Burke;Andrew P. Maurer

  • Greater running speeds result in altered hippocampal phase sequence dynamics.

    Andrew P. Maurer;Sara N. Burke;Sara N. Burke;Peter Lipa;Peter Lipa;William E. Skaggs

  • Age-Related Declines in Prefrontal Cortical Expression of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors that Support Working Memory.

    Caesar M. Hernandez;Joseph A. McQuail;Miranda R. Schwabe;Sara N. Burke

  • Transcription of the Immediate-early Gene Arc in CA1 of the Hippocampus Reveals Activity Differences along the Proximodistal Axis that are Attenuated by Advanced Age

    Andrea L. Hartzell;Sara N. Burke;Lan T. Hoang;James P. Lister

  • Rodent age‐related impairments in discriminating perceptually similar objects parallel those observed in humans

    Sarah A. Johnson;Sean M. Turner;Lindsay A. Santacroce;Katelyn N. Carty

  • Age-related Changes in Lateral Entorhinal and CA3 Neuron Allocation Predict Poor Performance on Object Discrimination

    Andrew P. Maurer;Sarah A. Johnson;Abbi R. Hernandez;Jordan Reasor

Frequent Co-Authors

Carol A. Barnes
Carol A. Barnes University of Arizona
Jennifer L. Bizon
Jennifer L. Bizon University of Florida
Barry Setlow
Barry Setlow University of Florida
Bruce L. McNaughton
Bruce L. McNaughton University of California, Irvine
Russell M. Bauer
Russell M. Bauer University of Florida
Lori L. McMahon
Lori L. McMahon University of Alabama at Birmingham
Paul F. Worley
Paul F. Worley Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Lee Ryan
Lee Ryan University of Arizona
Marcelo Febo
Marcelo Febo University of Florida
Denise C. Park
Denise C. Park The University of Texas at Dallas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're exploring a future in neuroscience, it's valuable to consider related online degree options that can broaden your career prospects. Many students find that degrees in psychology, social work, or counseling align closely with neuroscience concepts, opening doors to a variety of professions.

For those seeking a fast-track approach, several 1 year msw programs provide an accelerated path to a master's in social work. These programs can be especially useful for neuroscience graduates aiming to work in clinical or social service settings. Similarly, pursuing an online accelerated psychology degree can complement neuroscience expertise, particularly for students interested in behavioral science or mental health.

If counseling is your goal, affordability may be a concern. Research the cheapest online counseling degree options and accredited programs to find the best fit for your budget and career needs. In addition, several reputable universities offer online masters counseling programs designed for flexibility and cost-effectiveness. These pathways can prepare you for rewarding roles in mental health, therapy, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Sara N. Burke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles