World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
5100
World Ranking
8825
National Ranking
3731

Lori L. McMahon publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lori L. McMahon sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 102 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Lori L. McMahon D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lori L. McMahon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lori L. McMahon is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and medicine, with a strong focus on cellular and molecular neuroscience, physiology, cognitive neuroscience, molecular biology, and neurology.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics within neuroscience, including:

  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • Circadian Rhythm and Melatonin
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Recent publications by Lori L. McMahon include the following papers:

  • "Alzheimer's disease risk gene BIN1 induces Tau-dependent network hyperexcitability" (2020, eLife)
  • "Heightened Hippocampal β-Adrenergic Receptor Function Drives Synaptic Potentiation and Supports Learning and Memory in the TgF344-AD Rat Model during Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease" (2021, Journal of Neuroscience)
  • "Time-restricted feeding rescues high-fat-diet-induced hippocampal impairment" (2021, iScience)
  • "Dysregulated clock gene expression and abnormal diurnal regulation of hippocampal inhibitory transmission and spatial memory in amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice" (2021, Neurobiology of Disease)
  • "Examination of Diurnal Variation and Sex Differences in Hippocampal Neurophysiology and Spatial Memory" (2022, eNeuro)

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Neurobiology of Disease
  • eNeuro
  • Scientific Reports

The scientist collaborates regularly with several coauthors, notably:

  • Nateka L. Jackson
  • Erik D. Roberson
  • Anthoni M. Goodman
  • Jodi R. Paul
  • Karen L. Gamble

Best Publications

  • Estrogen-Induced Increase in the Magnitude of Long-Term Potentiation Occurs Only When the Ratio of NMDA Transmission to AMPA Transmission Is Increased

    Caroline C. Smith;Lori L. McMahon

  • Estradiol-Induced Increase in the Magnitude of Long-Term Potentiation Is Prevented by Blocking NR2B-Containing Receptors

    Caroline C. Smith;Lori L. McMahon

  • Deficiency in the Inhibitory Serine-Phosphorylation of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Increases Sensitivity to Mood Disturbances

    Abigail Polter;Eléonore Beurel;Sufen Yang;Rakesha Garner

  • G9a/GLP histone lysine dimethyltransferase complex activity in the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex is required for gene activation and silencing during memory consolidation.

    Swati Gupta-Agarwal;Aimee V. Franklin;Thomas DeRamus;Muriah Wheelock

  • Pharmacological Characterization of Glycine-Gated Chloride Currents Recorded in Rat Hippocampal Slices

    Siriporn C. Chattipakorn;Lori L. McMahon

  • Disinhibition of CA1 pyramidal cells by low-dose ketamine and other antagonists with rapid antidepressant efficacy

    Allie J. Widman;Lori L. McMahon

  • Hippocampal Interneurons Express a Novel Form of Synaptic Plasticity

    Lori L. McMahon;Julie A. Kauer

  • Hippocampal Interneurons Are Excited Via Serotonin-Gated Ion Channels

    Lori L. McMahon;Julie A. Kauer

  • Estradiol and the relationship between dendritic spines, NR2B containing NMDA receptors, and the magnitude of long-term potentiation at hippocampal CA3–CA1 synapses

    Caroline C. Smith;Lindsey C. Vedder;Lori L. McMahon

  • O-GlcNAcylation and neurodegeneration

    Willayat Y. Wani;John C. Chatham;Victor Darley-Usmar;Lori L. McMahon

  • Novel Form of Long-Term Synaptic Depression in Rat Hippocampus Induced By Activation of α1 Adrenergic Receptors

    Cary L. Scheiderer;Lynn E. Dobrunz;Lori L. McMahon

  • Nicotinic receptor activation facilitates GABAergic neurotransmission in the avian lateral spiriform nucleus.

    L.L. Mcmahon;K.-W. Yoon;V.A. Chiappinelli

  • Glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibitors reverse deficits in long-term potentiation and cognition in fragile X mice.

    Aimee V. Franklin;Margaret K. King;Valle Palomo;Ana Martinez

  • O-GlcNAcylation of AMPA receptor GluA2 is associated with a novel form of long-term depression at hippocampal synapses.

    Erica W. Taylor;Kai Wang;Amy R. Nelson;Teruko M. Bredemann

  • Sympathetic Sprouting Drives Hippocampal Cholinergic Reinnervation That Prevents Loss of a Muscarinic Receptor-Dependent Long-Term Depression at CA3–CA1 Synapses

    Cary L Scheiderer;Eve McCutchen;Erin E Thacker;Krystyna Kolasa

  • Duration of estrogen deprivation, not chronological age, prevents estrogen's ability to enhance hippocampal synaptic physiology

    Caroline C. Smith;Lindsey C. Vedder;Amy R. Nelson;Teruko M. Bredemann

  • Estradiol-induced increase in novel object recognition requires hippocampal NR2B-containing NMDA receptors.

    Lindsey C. Vedder;Caroline C. Smith;Alaina E. Flannigan;Lori L. McMahon

  • Strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors depress hyperexcitability in rat dentate gyrus.

    Siriporn C. Chattipakorn;Lori L. McMahon

  • Strength of cholinergic tone dictates the polarity of dopamine D2 receptor modulation of striatal cholinergic interneuron excitability in DYT1 dystonia.

    Mariangela Scarduzio;Chelsea N. Zimmerman;Karen L. Jaunarajs;Qin Wang

  • Glycine-gated chloride channels depress synaptic transmission in rat hippocampus.

    Weifeng Song;Siriporn C. Chattipakorn;Lori L. McMahon

  • Coactivation of M1 Muscarinic and α1 Adrenergic Receptors Stimulates Extracellular Signal-Regulated Protein Kinase and Induces Long-Term Depression at CA3–CA1 Synapses in Rat Hippocampus

    Cary L. Scheiderer;Caroline C. Smith;Eve McCutchen;Portia A. McCoy

Frequent Co-Authors

Namasivayam Ambalavanan
Namasivayam Ambalavanan University of Alabama at Birmingham
Karen L. Gamble
Karen L. Gamble University of Alabama at Birmingham
Julie A. Kauer
Julie A. Kauer Stanford University
Kai Wang
Kai Wang Jilin University
Dean P. Jones
Dean P. Jones Emory University
Jianhua Zhang
Jianhua Zhang The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Rosalinda C. Roberts
Rosalinda C. Roberts University of Alabama at Birmingham
Jennifer L. Bizon
Jennifer L. Bizon University of Florida
Sara N. Burke
Sara N. Burke University of Florida
David G. Standaert
David G. Standaert University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As neuroscience continues to evolve, students interested in related fields can benefit from flexible and innovative online study options. For those drawn to clinical practice, exploring psyd online programs offers a pathway to a doctorate in psychology, which can open doors to counseling, research, and healthcare leadership roles.

If you prefer working with families and couples, accelerated online mft programs make it possible to become a licensed marriage and family therapist on a shorter timeline. For undergraduates eager to fast-track their career, accelerated online degrees enable you to complete a bachelor's degree quickly, often in less than the traditional four years.

Choosing the right program also means considering future earning potential. Specialized fields and STEM-related subjects often rank among the highest paying majors, underlining the long-term benefits of strategic degree selection. Exploring these options helps you align your education with your career goals in neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Lori L. McMahon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles