World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
5751
World Ranking
8567
National Ranking
3644

Karen L. Gamble publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen L. Gamble sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 108 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Karen L. Gamble D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen L. Gamble sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karen L. Gamble is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with significant contributions to the study of Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Physiology, and Cognitive Neuroscience, alongside work in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The main research topics pursued by Karen L. Gamble include:

  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Dietary Effects on Health
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism

The scientist has contributed to several recent papers demonstrated by:

  • "Workshop report. Circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders: gaps and opportunities" (2021), published in SLEEP
  • "Toward Precision Medicine: Circadian Rhythm of Blood Pressure and Chronotherapy for Hypertension - 2021 NHLBI Workshop Report" (2022), published in Hypertension
  • "Timing of Food Intake Drives the Circadian Rhythm of Blood Pressure" (2020), published in Function
  • "Time-restricted feeding rescues high-fat-diet-induced hippocampal impairment" (2021), published in iScience
  • "Glucagon-receptor signaling regulates weight loss via central KLB receptor complexes" (2021), published in JCI Insight

Frequent co-authors working in collaboration with Karen L. Gamble include:

  • Jodi R. Paul
  • David M. Pollock
  • S. Justin Thomas
  • Shannon M. Bailey
  • Jennifer S. Pollock

The publication venues where Karen L. Gamble has appeared frequently are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Hypertension
  • Neurobiology of Disease
  • SLEEP

Best Publications

  • Dysregulation of Inflammatory Responses by Chronic Circadian Disruption

    Oscar Castanon-Cervantes;Mingwei Wu;J. Christopher Ehlen;Ketema Paul

  • Circadian clock control of endocrine factors

    Karen L. Gamble;Ryan Berry;Stuart J. Frank;Martin E. Young

  • Retinal Dopamine Mediates Multiple Dimensions of Light-Adapted Vision

    C. R. Jackson;G.-X. Ruan;F. Aseem;J. Abey

  • Formation of α-synuclein Lewy neurite-like aggregates in axons impedes the transport of distinct endosomes.

    Laura A. Volpicelli-Daley;Karen L. Gamble;Christine E. Schultheiss;Dawn M. Riddle

  • Cardiomyocyte-Specific BMAL1 Plays Critical Roles in Metabolism, Signaling, and Maintenance of Contractile Function of the Heart:

    Martin E. Young;Rachel A. Brewer;Rodrigo A. Peliciari-Garcia;Helen E. Collins

  • Quantitative analysis of light-phase restricted feeding reveals metabolic dyssynchrony in mice

    Molly S. Bray;William F. Ratcliffe;Maximiliano H. Grenett;Rachel A. Brewer

  • Shift work in nurses: contribution of phenotypes and genotypes to adaptation.

    Karen L. Gamble;Alison A. Motsinger-Reif;Akiko Hida;Hugo M. Borsetti

  • Shift work and circadian dysregulation of reproduction

    Karen L. Gamble;David Resuehr;Carl Hirschie Johnson

  • Perinatal photoperiod imprints the circadian clock

    Christopher M Ciarleglio;John C Axley;Benjamin R Strauss;Karen L Gamble;Karen L Gamble

  • O-GlcNAcylation, Novel Post-Translational Modification Linking Myocardial Metabolism and Cardiomyocyte Circadian Clock

    David J. Durgan;Betty M. Pat;Boglarka Laczy;Jerry A. Bradley

  • Evidence Suggesting that the Cardiomyocyte Circadian Clock Modulates Responsiveness of the Heart to Hypertrophic Stimuli in Mice

    David J. Durgan;Ju-Yun Tsai;Maximiliano H. Grenett;Betty M. Pat

  • The dynamics of GABA signaling: Revelations from the circadian pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

    H. Elliott Albers;James C. Walton;Karen L. Gamble;John K. McNeill

  • Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Mediates Light-Like Resetting of the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Circadian Pacemaker through cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein and Per1 Activation

    Karen L Gamble;Gregg C Allen;Tongrong Zhou;Douglas G McMahon

  • Motor restlessness, sleep disturbances, thermal sensory alterations and elevated serum iron levels in Btbd9 mutant mice

    Mark P. DeAndrade;Russell L. Johnson;Erica L. Unger;Li Zhang

  • Chronic Ethanol Consumption Disrupts the Core Molecular Clock and Diurnal Rhythms of Metabolic Genes in the Liver without Affecting the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus

    Ashley N. Filiano;Telisha Millender-Swain;Russell Johnson;Martin E. Young

  • Circadian Rhythmicity of Active GSK3 Isoforms Modulates Molecular Clock Gene Rhythms in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus

    Rachel C. Besing;Jodi R. Paul;Lauren M. Hablitz;Courtney O. Rogers

  • Toward Precision Medicine: Circadian Rhythm of Blood Pressure and Chronotherapy for Hypertension - 2021 NHLBI Workshop Report.

    Unknown

  • Workshop report. Circadian rhythm sleep–wake disorders: gaps and opportunities

    Jeanne F Duffy;Sabra M Abbott;Helen J Burgess;Stephanie J Crowley

  • Population Encoding by Circadian Clock Neurons Organizes Circadian Behavior

    Christopher M. Ciarleglio;Karen L. Gamble;John C. Axley;Benjamin R. Strauss

  • Circadian regulation of membrane physiology in neural oscillators throughout the brain.

    Jodi R. Paul;Jennifer A. Davis;Lacy K. Goode;Bryan K. Becker

  • Transgenic elimination of high-affinity antidepressant and cocaine sensitivity in the presynaptic serotonin transporter

    Brent J. Thompson;Tammy Jessen;L. K. Henry;Julie R. Field

  • Retinal Dopamine Mediates Multiple Dimensions of Light-Adapted Vision

    Chad R. Jackson;Guo-Xiang Ruan;Fazila Aseem;Jane Abey

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin E. Young
Martin E. Young University of Alabama at Birmingham
Douglas G. McMahon
Douglas G. McMahon Vanderbilt University
Jennifer S. Pollock
Jennifer S. Pollock University of Alabama at Birmingham
H. Elliott Albers
H. Elliott Albers Georgia State University
Colleen M. Novak
Colleen M. Novak Kent State University
Carl Hirschie Johnson
Carl Hirschie Johnson Vanderbilt University
Lori L. McMahon
Lori L. McMahon University of Alabama at Birmingham
Karen L. Cropsey
Karen L. Cropsey University of Alabama at Birmingham
Yuqing Li
Yuqing Li University of Florida
David C. Schwebel
David C. Schwebel University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in neuroscience opens doors to a variety of career paths, and related online degrees can broaden your opportunities. Fields such as psychology, counseling, and social work often intersect with neuroscience, and pursuing further study in these areas can enhance your skills and employability.

If you’re considering an advanced degree, exploring the affordable online MFT programs can prepare you for roles in marriage and family therapy, where neuroscience insights are increasingly valued. Alternatively, pursuing the cheapest online master's degree in psychology provides a strong academic foundation for understanding human behavior and mental processes.

For those working toward an undergraduate credential, a cheap psychology degree online can be an accessible entry point into the mental health or neuroscience fields. And if you’re interested in supporting communities through social work, consider one of the easiest online MSW program options to begin your professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Karen L. Gamble

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles