World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
22270
World Ranking
15741
National Ranking
7921

Martin E. Young publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin E. Young sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 292 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Martin E. Young D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin E. Young sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin E. Young is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their research spans a range of topics in medicine and molecular biology, with a particular focus on circadian rhythms, cardiovascular function, metabolism, and aging.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • "Empagliflozin Blunts Worsening Cardiac Dysfunction Associated With Reduced NLRP3 (Nucleotide-Binding Domain-Like Receptor Protein 3) Inflammasome Activation in Heart Failure" (2020), Circulation Heart Failure
  • "Chronobiological Influence Over Cardiovascular Function" (2020), Circulation Research
  • "Increased Glucose Availability Attenuates Myocardial Ketone Body Utilization" (2020), Journal of the American Heart Association
  • "Circadian REV-ERBs repress E4bp4 to activate NAMPT-dependent NAD+ biosynthesis and sustain cardiac function" (2021), Nature Cardiovascular Research
  • "MitoQ regulates redox-related noncoding RNAs to preserve mitochondrial network integrity in pressure-overload heart failure" (2020), American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology

Frequent co-authors include:

  • John C. Chatham
  • Victor Darley-Usmar
  • Sumanth D. Prabhu
  • Mary N. Latimer
  • Min Xie

The primary publication venues for this scientist are:

  • Circulation Research
  • Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Circulation
  • JACC Basic to Translational Science

Martin E. Young's main fields of study are medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work delves into several subfields, including molecular biology, physiology, endocrine and autonomic systems, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and aging.

The core topics addressed in their research cover:

  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Genetics, aging, and longevity in model organisms
  • Adipose tissue and metabolism
  • Dietary effects on health
  • Mitochondrial function and pathology
  • Autophagy in disease and therapy
  • Cardiac ischemia and reperfusion

Best Publications

  • Adaptation and Maladaptation of the Heart in Diabetes: Part I: General Concepts

    Heinrich Taegtmeyer;Patrick McNulty;Martin E. Young

  • Metabolic Gene Expression in Fetal and Failing Human Heart

    Peter Razeghi;Martin E. Young;Joseph L. Alcorn;Christine S. Moravec

  • Adaptation and maladaptation of the heart in diabetes: Part II: Potential mechanisms

    Martin E. Young;Patrick McNulty;Heinrich Taegtmeyer

  • Reduced Mitochondrial Oxidative Capacity and Increased Mitochondrial Uncoupling Impair Myocardial Energetics in Obesity

    Sihem Boudina;Sandra Sena;Brian T. O’Neill;Prakash Tathireddy

  • Circadian clock control of endocrine factors

    Karen L. Gamble;Ryan Berry;Stuart J. Frank;Martin E. Young

  • Increased Hepatic CD36 Expression Contributes to Dyslipidemia Associated With Diet-Induced Obesity

    Debby P Y Koonen;René L. Jacobs;Maria Febbraio;Martin E. Young

  • Insulin signaling coordinately regulates cardiac size, metabolism, and contractile protein isoform expression

    Darrell D. Belke;Sandrine Betuing;Martin J. Tuttle;Christophe Graveleau

  • Activation of AMP-activated Protein Kinase Inhibits Protein Synthesis Associated with Hypertrophy in the Cardiac Myocyte

    Anita Y.M. Chan;Carrie Lynn M. Soltys;Martin E. Young;Christopher G. Proud

  • Disruption of the circadian clock within the cardiomyocyte influences myocardial contractile function, metabolism, and gene expression

    Molly S. Bray;Chad A. Shaw;Michael W.S. Moore;Rodrigo A.P. Garcia;Rodrigo A.P. Garcia

  • Clock Genes in the Heart: Characterization and Attenuation With Hypertrophy

    Martin E. Young;Peter Razeghi;Heinrich Taegtmeyer

  • Impaired Long-Chain Fatty Acid Oxidation and Contractile Dysfunction in the Obese Zucker Rat Heart

    Martin E. Young;Patrick H. Guthrie;Peter Razeghi;Brendan Leighton

  • Reactivation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α is associated with contractile dysfunction in hypertrophied rat heart

    Martin E. Young;Frank A. Laws;Gary W. Goodwin;Heinrich Taegtmeyer

  • Effects of glucocorticoid excess on the sensitivity of glucose transport and metabolism to insulin in rat skeletal muscle.

    George Dimitriadis;Brendan Leighton;Mark Parry-Billings;Shlomo Sasson

  • The Cardiomyocyte Circadian Clock: Emerging Roles in Health and Disease

    David J. Durgan;Martin E. Young

  • Short Communication: Ischemia/Reperfusion Tolerance Is Time-of-Day–Dependent: Mediation by the Cardiomyocyte Circadian Clock

    David J. Durgan;Thomas Pulinilkunnil;Carolina Villegas-Montoya;Merissa E. Garvey

  • Nitric oxide stimulates glucose transport and metabolism in rat skeletal muscle in vitro

    Martin E. Young;George K. Radda;Brendan Leighton

  • Assessing Cardiac Metabolism

    Heinrich Taegtmeyer;Martin E. Young;Gary D. Lopaschuk;E. Dale Abel

  • Intrinsic diurnal variations in cardiac metabolism and contractile function

    Martin E. Young;Peter Razeghi;Ari M. Cedars;Patrick H. Guthrie

  • The circadian clock within the heart: potential influence on myocardial gene expression, metabolism, and function

    Martin E. Young

  • Circadian rhythms in the development of obesity: potential role for the circadian clock within the adipocyte.

    M. S. Bray;M. E. Young

Frequent Co-Authors

Heinrich Taegtmeyer
Heinrich Taegtmeyer The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Jason R.B. Dyck
Jason R.B. Dyck University of Alberta
Karen L. Gamble
Karen L. Gamble University of Alabama at Birmingham
Stuart J. Frank
Stuart J. Frank University of Alabama at Birmingham
Victor M. Darley-Usmar
Victor M. Darley-Usmar University of Alabama at Birmingham
Jianhua Zhang
Jianhua Zhang The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
E. Dale Abel
E. Dale Abel University of California, Los Angeles
Charles L. Hoppel
Charles L. Hoppel Case Western Reserve University
Chad A. Shaw
Chad A. Shaw Baylor College of Medicine
Jennifer S. Pollock
Jennifer S. Pollock University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but unsure if a traditional medical degree is the right fit? There are many related online study options that open doors to rewarding careers in medicine and healthcare. For those considering nursing, numerous online nursing programs provide flexible pathways to enter or advance in the field while balancing work or family commitments.

Advancing your education can enhance your opportunities, with options like phd nursing programs online helping nurses develop as leaders or researchers. If you’re already an RN, exploring what is the cheapest rn to bsn program online can be a cost-effective way to increase your qualifications.

Even if your undergraduate degree isn’t in nursing, fast-track options like non nursing bachelor's to msn online programs offer direct entry into advanced nursing roles. With so many flexible online choices, you can find the right academic and career path that matches your background, budget, and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Martin E. Young

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles