World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
6313
World Ranking
12022
National Ranking
4906

Mikhail Smelyanskiy publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mikhail Smelyanskiy sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 90 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mikhail Smelyanskiy D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mikhail Smelyanskiy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mikhail Smelyanskiy is affiliated with Nvidia in the United States, focusing on research within the field of Computer Science. Their work spans multiple subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Hardware and Architecture, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Information Systems. The breadth of research topics covered reflects an interdisciplinary approach to advancements in computing technologies.

Their scholarly output includes a series of recent papers that address various aspects of deep learning systems, inference architectures, and scalable training methods. Notable publications include:

  • Deep Learning Training in Facebook Data Centers: Design of Scale-up and Scale-out Systems (2020, arXiv [Cornell University])
  • FBGEMM: Enabling High-Performance Low-Precision Deep Learning Inference (2021, arXiv [Cornell University])
  • Supporting Massive DLRM Inference through Software Defined Memory (2022, 2022 IEEE 42nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems [ICDCS])
  • Low-Precision Hardware Architectures Meet Recommendation Model Inference at Scale (2021, IEEE Micro)
  • Software-Hardware Co-design for Fast and Scalable Training of Deep Learning Recommendation Models (2021, arXiv [Cornell University])

The topics investigated in these papers highlight main research themes such as advanced data storage technologies, parallel computing and optimization techniques, advanced neural network applications, recommender systems and techniques, caching and content delivery, stochastic gradient optimization techniques, and machine learning and data classification. These themes indicate a focus on the infrastructural and algorithmic challenges in deploying and optimizing machine learning at scale.

Smelyanskiy frequently collaborates with several co-authors, contributing to a diverse research network. Regular collaborators include Maxim Naumov, Changkyu Kim, Hector Yuen, Dheevatsa Mudigere, and Jongsoo Park.

Research dissemination primarily occurs through venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), which accounts for multiple publications, the 2022 IEEE 42nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), and IEEE Micro. These publication venues suggest a balance between preprint dissemination and peer-reviewed conferences and journals focused on computing systems.

Best Publications

  • On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minima

    Nitish Shirish Keskar;Dheevatsa Mudigere;Jorge Nocedal;Mikhail Smelyanskiy

  • Debunking the 100X GPU vs. CPU myth: an evaluation of throughput computing on CPU and GPU

    Victor W. Lee;Changkyu Kim;Jatin Chhugani;Michael Deisher

  • Applied Machine Learning at Facebook: A Datacenter Infrastructure Perspective

    Kim Hazelwood;Sarah Bird;David Brooks;Soumith Chintala

  • On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minima

    Nitish Shirish Keskar;Dheevatsa Mudigere;Jorge Nocedal;Mikhail Smelyanskiy

  • Efficient sparse matrix-vector multiplication on x86-based many-core processors

    Xing Liu;Mikhail Smelyanskiy;Edmond Chow;Pradeep Dubey

  • Debunking the 100X GPU vs. CPU myth

    Unknown

  • The Architectural Implications of Facebook's DNN-Based Personalized Recommendation

    Udit Gupta;Carole-Jean Wu;Xiaodong Wang;Maxim Naumov

  • Design and Implementation of the Linpack Benchmark for Single and Multi-node Systems Based on Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor

    Alexander Heinecke;Karthikeyan Vaidyanathan;Mikhail Smelyanskiy;Alexander Kobotov

  • Exploring SIMD for Molecular Dynamics, Using Intel® Xeon® Processors and Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessors

    S. J. Pennycook;C. J. Hughes;M. Smelyanskiy;S. A. Jarvis

  • RecNMP: accelerating personalized recommendation with near-memory processing

    Liu Ke;Udit Gupta;Benjamin Youngjae Cho;David Brooks

  • Petascale high order dynamic rupture earthquake simulations on heterogeneous supercomputers

    Alexander Heinecke;Alexander Breuer;Sebastian Rettenberger;Michael Bader

  • qHiPSTER: The Quantum High Performance Software Testing Environment

    Mikhail Smelyanskiy;Nicolas P. D. Sawaya;Alán Aspuru-Guzik

  • Anatomy of High-Performance Many-Threaded Matrix Multiplication

    Tyler M. Smith;Robert van de Geijn;Mikhail Smelyanskiy;Jeff R. Hammond

  • Convergence of Recognition, Mining, and Synthesis Workloads and Its Implications

    Yen-Kuang Chen;J. Chhugani;P. Dubey;C.J. Hughes

  • Practical optimization for hybrid quantum-classical algorithms

    Gian Giacomo Guerreschi;Mikhail Smelyanskiy

  • Deep Learning Inference in Facebook Data Centers: Characterization, Performance Optimizations and Hardware Implications

    Jongsoo Park;Maxim Naumov;Protonu Basu;Summer Deng

  • Can traditional programming bridge the Ninja performance gap for parallel computing applications

    Nadathur Satish;Changkyu Kim;Jatin Chhugani;Hideki Saito

  • The BLIS Framework: Experiments in Portability

    Field G. Van Zee;Tyler M. Smith;Bryan Marker;Tze Meng Low

  • Mapping High-Fidelity Volume Rendering for Medical Imaging to CPU, GPU and Many-Core Architectures

    M. Smelyanskiy;D. Holmes;J. Chhugani;A. Larson

  • Software-Hardware Co-design for Fast and Scalable Training of Deep Learning Recommendation Models

    Dheevatsa Mudigere;Yuchen Hao;Jianyu Huang;Zhihao Jia

  • Vector instructions to enable efficient synchronization and parallel reduction operations

    Mikhail Smelyanskiy;Sanjeev Kumar;Daehyun Kim;Jatin Chhugani

  • Sparsifying Synchronization for High-Performance Shared-Memory Sparse Triangular Solver

    Jongsoo Park;Mikhail Smelyanskiy;Narayanan Sundaram;Pradeep Dubey

  • Optimization of geometric multigrid for emerging multi- and manycore processors

    Samuel Williams;Dhiraj D. Kalamkar;Amik Singh;Anand M. Deshpande

  • Deep Learning Training in Facebook Data Centers: Design of Scale-up and Scale-out Systems.

    Maxim Naumov;John Kim;Dheevatsa Mudigere;Srinivas Sridharan

  • The Architectural Implications of Facebook's DNN-based Personalized Recommendation

    Udit Gupta;Carole-Jean Wu;Xiaodong Wang;Maxim Naumov

Frequent Co-Authors

Pradeep Dubey
Pradeep Dubey Intel (United States)
Changkyu Kim
Changkyu Kim Facebook (United States)
Nadathur Satish
Nadathur Satish Facebook (United States)
Yen-Kuang Chen
Yen-Kuang Chen Alibaba Group (China)
Edward S. Davidson
Edward S. Davidson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Hsien-Hsin S. Lee
Hsien-Hsin S. Lee Intel (United States)
Carole-Jean Wu
Carole-Jean Wu Meta Platforms, Inc.
Kim Hazelwood
Kim Hazelwood Facebook (United States)
David Brooks
David Brooks Harvard University
John L. Volakis
John L. Volakis Florida International University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up many career pathways beyond traditional computer science. Students interested in a broader science foundation may consider an online bachelor’s degree in physics for its strong analytical and problem-solving components.

Data science is rapidly growing and offers excellent salaries. For prospective students looking to maximize value, researching an affordable data science degree can be a strategic choice, especially with the demand for experts in big data and machine learning.

Engineering skills are always in demand. Those considering online programs should review electrical engineering online tuition costs to find quality education that fits their budget.

If you’re seeking a quicker route into the tech industry, there are quick certifications that pay well. These can provide a fast track to high-earning roles without the time commitment of a full degree.

Best Scientists Citing Mikhail Smelyanskiy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles