World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
40
Citations
5339
World Ranking
6185
National Ranking
649

Mark H. Garnett publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark H. Garnett sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 134 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mark H. Garnett D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark H. Garnett sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark H. Garnett is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions to subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change, and Oceanography.

Their research topics include:

  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Climate Change and Permafrost
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology

Mark H. Garnett has contributed papers to a variety of scientific journals and venues. Frequent publication venues include Radiocarbon, Global Change Biology, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, Nature Communications, and The Science of The Total Environment.

Examples of recent papers authored or co-authored by Garnett include:

  • "Radiocarbon dating," 2021, Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • "East Siberian Arctic inland waters emit mostly contemporary carbon," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Assessing the Potential for Mobilization of Old Soil Carbon After Permafrost Thaw: A Synthesis of 14C Measurements From the Northern Permafrost Region," 2020, Global Biogeochemical Cycles
  • "Temperature control on CO2 emissions from the weathering of sedimentary rocks," 2021, Nature Geoscience
  • "Plant carbon allocation drives turnover of old soil organic matter in permafrost tundra soils," 2020, Global Change Biology

Frequent co-authors in Garnett's publications include Robert Hilton, Joshua Dean, Philippa Ascough, Jorien E. Vonk, and Guillaume Soulet. Their collaborations reflect recurring thematic interests and intersections within their research network.

Best Publications

  • Deep instability of deforested tropical peatlands revealed by fluvial organic carbon fluxes

    Sam Moore;Chris D. Evans;Susan E. Page;Mark H. Garnett

  • Heterotrophic microbial communities use ancient carbon following glacial retreat

    Richard D Bardgett;Andreas Richter;Roland Bol;Mark H Garnett

  • A potential loss of carbon associated with greater plant growth in the European Arctic

    Iain P Hartley;Iain P Hartley;Mark H Garnett;Martin Sommerkorn;David William Hopkins;David William Hopkins

  • Soil microbial respiration in arctic soil does not acclimate to temperature.

    Iain P Hartley;David W Hopkins;David W Hopkins;Mark H Garnett;Martin Sommerkorn

  • Effects of burning and grazing on carbon sequestration in a Pennine blanket bog, UK.

    M. H. Garnett;P. Ineson;A. C. Stevenson

  • The natural abundance of 13C, 15N, 34S and 14C in archived (1923-2000) plant and soil samples from the Askov long-term experiments on animal manure and mineral fertilizer.

    Roland Bol;Jorgen Eriksen;Pete Smith;Mark H. Garnett

  • Evidence against recent climate-induced destabilisation of soil carbon from 14C analysis of riverine dissolved organic matter

    Chris D. Evans;Chris Freeman;Lorna G. Cork;David N. Thomas

  • Vascular plants promote ancient peatland carbon loss with climate warming.

    Tom Walker;Tom Walker;Mark H. Garnett;Susan Elizabeth Ward;Simon Oakley

  • East Siberian Arctic inland waters emit mostly contemporary carbon.

    Joshua F. Dean;Joshua F. Dean;Ove H. Meisel;Melanie Martyn Rosco;Luca Belelli Marchesini

  • Terrestrial organic carbon storage in a British moorland

    MarK. H. Garnett;Philip Ineson;Anthony C. Stevenson;David C. Howard

  • CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE USING A ZEOLITE MOLECULAR SIEVE SAMPLING SYSTEM FOR ISOTOPIC STUDIES (13C AND 14C) OF RESPIRATION

    S M L Hardie;M H Garnett;A E Fallick;A P Rowland

  • Contrasting vulnerability of drained tropical and high-latitude peatlands to fluvial loss of stored carbon

    Christopher D Evans;Susan E Page;Tim Jones;Sam Moore;Sam Moore

  • Limited contribution of permafrost carbon to methane release from thawing peatlands

    Mark D.A. Cooper;Cristian Estop-Aragonés;Cristian Estop-Aragonés;James P. Fisher;Aaron Thierry

  • Dynamics and pathways of autotrophic and heterotrophic soil CO2 efflux revealed by forest girdling

    Jens-Arne Subke;Jens-Arne Subke;Naomi R. Voke;Vincenzo Leronni;Mark H. Garnett

  • UK peatland streams release old carbon dioxide to the atmosphere and young dissolved organic carbon to rivers

    Michael F. Billett;Mark H. Garnett;Frank Harvey

  • Assessing the Potential for Mobilization of Old Soil Carbon After Permafrost Thaw: A Synthesis of 14 C Measurements From the Northern Permafrost Region

    Cristian Estop‐Aragonés;Cristian Estop‐Aragonés;David Olefeldt;Benjamin W. Abbott;Jeffrey P. Chanton

  • Temperature control on CO2 emissions from the weathering of sedimentary rocks

    Guillaume Soulet;Guillaume Soulet;Robert G. Hilton;Robert G. Hilton;Mark H. Garnett;Tobias Roylands

  • Test of AMS 14C dating of pollen concentrates using tephrochronology

    Rewi M. Newnham;Marcus J. Vandergoes;Mark H. Garnett;David J. Lowe

  • Vascular plant-mediated controls on atmospheric carbon assimilation and peat carbon decomposition under climate change

    Konstantin Gavazov;Konstantin Gavazov;Konstantin Gavazov;Remy Albrecht;Remy Albrecht;Alexandre Buttler;Alexandre Buttler;Alexandre Buttler;Ellen Dorrepaal

  • Earthworm ecological groupings based on 14C analysis

    Maria Jesus I. Briones;M. H. Garnett;Trevor G. Piearce

  • Nineteenth and twentieth century sea-level changes in Tasmania and New Zealand

    W. Roland Gehrels;S. Louise Callard;Patrick T. Moss;William A. Marshall

  • Current forest carbon fixation fuels stream CO2 emissions

    Audrey Campeau;Kevin Bishop;Nino Amvrosiadi;Mike Billett

  • The MILLENNIA peat cohort model: predicting past, present and future soil carbon budgets and fluxes under changing climates in peatlands

    Andreas Heinemeyer;Simon Croft;Mark H. Garnett;Emanuel Gloor

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael F. Billett
Michael F. Billett University of Stirling
Iain P. Hartley
Iain P. Hartley University of Exeter
Philip A. Wookey
Philip A. Wookey University of Stirling
Nick Ostle
Nick Ostle Lancaster University
David W. Hopkins
David W. Hopkins Scotland's Rural College
Susan Waldron
Susan Waldron University of Glasgow
Emma J. Sayer
Emma J. Sayer Lancaster University
Jason Newton
Jason Newton University of Glasgow
Anthony E. Fallick
Anthony E. Fallick University of Glasgow
Chris D. Evans
Chris D. Evans UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As careers in Ecology and Evolution continue to evolve, flexible online education options are more important than ever. Students can now pursue relevant degrees from non profit online universities, ensuring high academic standards and broader accessibility.

For military members and veterans planning a transition into environmental fields, specialized resources such as the best online colleges for military provide tailored support and flexibility.

Considering interdisciplinary applications? Programs like the best online msw programs can prepare you to address ecological challenges through a social lens. Alternatively, roles in research, data analysis, and conservation psychology are accessible with credentials such as an online masters in psychology.

Whether you are seeking a direct path into Ecology, or exploring intersecting fields like social work or psychology, online degree options offer convenience, quality, and a range of career pathways for a future-ready workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Mark H. Garnett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles