What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Climate change
- Statistics
Sea level, Climatology, Oceanography, Foraminifera and Sea level rise are his primary areas of study.
His studies in Sea level integrate themes in fields like Coastal flood and Holocene.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Elevation and Chronology.
In his study, Period, Global temperature and Sedimentary rock is strongly linked to Post-glacial rebound, which falls under the umbrella field of Climatology.
His work on Salt marsh and Storm as part of his general Oceanography study is frequently connected to Subsidence, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
The concepts of his Sea level rise study are interwoven with issues in Bedrock, Range and Expert elicitation.
His most cited work include:
- Climate related sea-level variations over the past two millennia (316 citations)
- Temperature-driven global sea-level variability in the Common Era (205 citations)
- Expert assessment of sea-level rise by AD 2100 and AD 2300 (182 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of study are Sea level, Oceanography, Salt marsh, Holocene and Foraminifera.
The Sea level study combines topics in areas such as Paleontology, Climatology and Spatial variability.
His work on Sea level rise, Bay and Estuary as part of general Oceanography research is frequently linked to Environmental science and Subsidence, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.
The various areas that Andrew C. Kemp examines in his Salt marsh study include Radiocarbon dating, Sediment, Marsh, High marsh and Peat.
His research in Holocene intersects with topics in Cape and Compaction, Geomorphology.
His Foraminifera study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Inlet, Elevation, Intertidal ecology, Intertidal zone and Transect.
He most often published in these fields:
- Sea level (72.97%)
- Oceanography (48.65%)
- Salt marsh (44.14%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Sea level (72.97%)
- Oceanography (48.65%)
- Salt marsh (44.14%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Sea level, Oceanography, Salt marsh, Environmental science and Sediment.
He has researched Sea level in several fields, including Climatology, Range, Holocene and Spatial variability.
His Holocene research focuses on Global change and how it connects with Paleontology.
His research integrates issues of Foraminifera, White and Peat in his study of Salt marsh.
His Foraminifera research integrates issues from Range, Radiocarbon dating, Transect and Testate amoebae.
His Sediment study also includes
- Marsh which intersects with area such as Lawn, Elevation, Diatom and Pollutant,
- Bay that intertwine with fields like Mangrove.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- River-discharge effects on United States Atlantic and Gulf coast sea-level changes. (31 citations)
- Relative Sea-Level Trends in New York City During the Past 1500 Years (24 citations)
- Upslope development of a tidal marsh as a function of upland land use. (23 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Climate change
- Statistics
Andrew C. Kemp mainly focuses on Sea level, Oceanography, Sediment, Salt marsh and Environmental science.
The Sea level study combines topics in areas such as Foraminifera, Climatology, Climate change and Range.
His study in Foraminifera is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Radiocarbon dating and Physical geography.
His Oceanography study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Common spatial pattern, Spatial variability and Crust.
Andrew C. Kemp works mostly in the field of Sediment, limiting it down to topics relating to Holocene and, in certain cases, Cape, Atmospheric circulation and Gulf Stream.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Peat and Marsh.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
