World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
60
Citations
16041
World Ranking
2886
National Ranking
1135

Radley M. Horton publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Radley M. Horton sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 176 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Radley M. Horton D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Radley M. Horton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Radley M. Horton is affiliated with the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within environmental science, with a distinct focus on climate-related phenomena and the interactions between atmospheric conditions and societal impacts.

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • A typology of compound weather and climate events, 2020, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • The emergence of heat and humidity too severe for human tolerance, 2020, Science Advances
  • Understanding and managing connected extreme events, 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • Stronger temperature-moisture couplings exacerbate the impact of climate warming on global crop yields, 2021, Nature Food
  • Recent Increases in Exposure to Extreme Humid-Heat Events Disproportionately Affect Populated Regions, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Horton include Colin Raymond, Catherine Ivanovich, Ethan Coffel, Corey Lesk, and Philip Orton.

The main publication venues where Horton frequently publishes are:

  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  • Nature Climate Change
  • Nature Communications
  • Nature Reviews Earth & Environment

Horton's primary field of study is Environmental Science. Their subfields of focus encompass:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

The main topics addressed in Horton's work are:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management

This body of work highlights a comprehensive focus on the dynamics of climate systems, the effects of extreme weather events on human health and agriculture, and the development of models and assessments related to environmental risk.

Best Publications

  • A typology of compound weather and climate events

    Jakob Zscheischler;Jakob Zscheischler;Olivia Martius;Olivia Martius;Seth Westra;Emanuele Bevacqua

  • Probabilistic 21st and 22nd Century Sea-Level Projections at a Global Network of Tide-Gauge Sites

    Robert E. Kopp;Radley M. Horton;Christopher M. Little;Jerry X. Mitrovica

  • Impact of declining Arctic sea ice on winter snowfall

    Jiping Liu;Judith A. Curry;Huijun Wang;Mirong Song

  • The emergence of heat and humidity too severe for human tolerance

    Colin Raymond;Colin Raymond;Tom Matthews;Radley M. Horton;Radley M. Horton

  • New York, USA

    Radley Horton;Michael Dorsch;Lesley Patrick;Stephen Solecki

  • Understanding and managing connected extreme events

    Colin Raymond;Colin Raymond;Radley M. Horton;Jakob Zscheischler;Olivia Martius

  • Global and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States

    William V. Sweet;Robert Kopp;Christopher P. Weaver;Jayantha Obeysekera

  • A Review of Recent Advances in Research on Extreme Heat Events

    Radley M. Horton;Radley M. Horton;Justin S. Mankin;Justin S. Mankin;Corey Lesk;Ethan Coffel

  • Temperature and humidity based projections of a rapid rise in global heat stress exposure during the 21st century

    Ethan Coffel;Ethan Coffel;Radley M. Horton;Radley M. Horton;Alexander M. De Sherbinin

  • Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment (NCA4), Volume I

    Donald J. Wuebbles;David W. Fahey;Kathy A. Hibbard;Jeff R. Arnold

  • Global sea level rise scenarios for the United States National Climate Assessment

    Adam S. Parris;Peter Bromirski;Virginia Burkett;Daniel R. Cayan

  • Amplified Rossby waves enhance risk of concurrent heatwaves in major breadbasket regions

    Kai Kornhuber;Kai Kornhuber;Dim Coumou;Dim Coumou;Elisabeth Vogel;Corey Lesk

  • Statistical Downscaling and Bias Correction of Climate Model Outputs for Climate Change Impact Assessment in the U.S. Northeast

    Kazi Farzan Ahmed;Guiling Wang;John Silander;Adam M. Wilson

  • Evolving Understanding of Antarctic Ice-Sheet Physics and Ambiguity in Probabilistic Sea-Level Projections

    Robert E. Kopp;Robert M. DeConto;Daniel A. Bader;Carling C. Hay;Carling C. Hay;Carling C. Hay

  • Developing coastal adaptation to climate change in the New York City infrastructure-shed: process, approach, tools, and strategies

    Cynthia Rosenzweig;William D. Solecki;Reginald Blake;Malcolm Bowman

  • Stronger temperature–moisture couplings exacerbate the impact of climate warming on global crop yields

    Corey Lesk;Corey Lesk;Ethan Coffel;Jonathan Winter;Deepak Ray

  • Sea level rise projections for current generation CGCMs based on the semi‐empirical method

    Radley Horton;Radley Horton;Celine Herweijer;Cynthia Rosenzweig;Jiping Liu

  • Reducing spread in climate model projections of a September ice-free Arctic

    Jiping Liu;Mirong Song;Radley M. Horton;Yongyun Hu

  • Projections of seasonal patterns in temperature- related deaths for Manhattan, New York

    Tiantian Li;Radley M. Horton;Patrick L. Kinney

  • Multi-factor impact analysis of agricultural production in Bangladesh with climate change

    Alex C. Ruane;David C. Major;Winston H. Yu;Mozaharul Alam;Mozaharul Alam

Frequent Co-Authors

Cynthia Rosenzweig
Cynthia Rosenzweig Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Robert E. Kopp
Robert E. Kopp Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Patrick L. Kinney
Patrick L. Kinney Boston University
Michael Oppenheimer
Michael Oppenheimer Princeton University
Justin S. Mankin
Justin S. Mankin Dartmouth College
William Solecki
William Solecki City University of New York
Alex C. Ruane
Alex C. Ruane Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Yongyun Hu
Yongyun Hu Peking University
Christopher M. Little
Christopher M. Little Atmospheric and Environmental Research
Jakob Zscheischler
Jakob Zscheischler Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to various specialized fields and career opportunities. For students exploring alternative options, starting with one of the easiest bachelor's degree programs can provide a manageable entry point into environmental studies while building foundational knowledge.

For those interested in the Earth's physical properties and processes, online options like the best online geology degree offer flexible learning paths focused on geoscience. Graduates can work in resource management, conservation, or hazard assessment.

Another growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), a crucial tool in environmental data analysis and mapping. Discovering the best gis programs online can prepare students for roles in urban planning, environmental consulting, or wildlife management.

For professionals aiming to integrate environmental policy and administration, a focused, accelerated path like the mpa one year programs equips them with leadership skills necessary to influence sustainable development and public sector projects.

Best Scientists Citing Radley M. Horton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles