World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
9802
World Ranking
4755
National Ranking
196

Etienne Challet publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Etienne Challet sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Etienne Challet D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Etienne Challet sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Etienne Challet is affiliated with the University of Strasbourg in France. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and medicine, with a particular emphasis on endocrine and autonomic systems, physiology, and cognitive neuroscience, alongside cellular and molecular neuroscience and social psychology as subfields.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics centered on circadian rhythm and melatonin, dietary effects on health, and sleep and wakefulness research. Additional research interests include photoreceptor and optogenetics studies, diet and metabolism, genetics and aging in model organisms, and neurobiology related to insect physiology.

Etienne Challet's recent publications demonstrate a focus on the circadian system, energy metabolism, and behavior. Key works include:

  • Melatonin and the circadian system: Keys for health with a focus on sleep (2021), published in Handbook of Clinical Neurology
  • Reciprocal Interactions between Circadian Clocks, Food Intake, and Energy Metabolism (2023), published in Biology
  • Prefrontal cortex molecular clock modulates development of depression-like phenotype and rapid antidepressant response in mice (2024), published in Nature Communications
  • Melatonin rhythm and other outputs of the master circadian clock in the desert goat (Capra hircus) are entrained by daily cycles of ambient temperature (2020), published in Journal of Pineal Research
  • Distinct feedback actions of behavioural arousal to the master circadian clock in nocturnal and diurnal mammals (2021), published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Collaborations are a significant aspect of Challet's work. Frequent co-authors include Paul Pévet, Hicham Farsi, Mohamed Rachid Achaâban, Mohammed Piro, and Khalid El Allali.

Etienne Challet has published frequently in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Médecine du Sommeil, IBRO Neuroscience Reports, Journal of Pineal Research, and Scientific Reports.

Best Publications

  • The Functional and Clinical Significance of the 24-Hour Rhythm of Circulating Glucocorticoids

    Henrik Oster;Etienne Challet;Volker Ott;Emanuela Arvat

  • Melatonin: Both master clock output and internal time-giver in the circadian clocks network

    Paul Pevet;Etienne Challet

  • Minireview: Entrainment of the Suprachiasmatic Clockwork in Diurnal and Nocturnal Mammals

    Etienne Challet

  • The circadian regulation of food intake.

    Etienne Challet

  • The nuclear receptor REV-ERBα is required for the daily balance of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism

    Julien Delezie;Stéphanie Dumont;Hugues Dardente;Hugues Oudart

  • Lack of Food Anticipation in Per2 Mutant Mice

    Céline A. Feillet;Céline A. Feillet;Jürgen A. Ripperger;Maria Chiara Magnone;Abdul G. Dulloo

  • Feeding Cues Alter Clock Gene Oscillations and Photic Responses in the Suprachiasmatic Nuclei of Mice Exposed to a Light/Dark Cycle

    Jorge Mendoza;Caroline Graff;Hugues Dardente;Paul Pevet

  • Circadian rhythms in glucose and lipid metabolism in nocturnal and diurnal mammals.

    Pawan Kumar Jha;Etienne Challet;Andries Kalsbeek;Andries Kalsbeek;Andries Kalsbeek

  • High‐fat feeding alters the clock synchronization to light

    Jorge Mendoza;Paul Pévet;Etienne Challet

  • Synchronization of the molecular clockwork by light- and food-related cues in mammals.

    Etienne Challet;Ivette Caldelas;Caroline Graff;Paul Pévet

  • Impact of Sleep and Circadian Disruption on Energy Balance and Diabetes: A Summary of Workshop Discussions.

    Deanna M. Arble;Joseph Bass;Cecilia Diniz Behn;Matthew P. Butler

  • Keeping circadian time with hormones.

    E. Challet

  • Daily and circadian expression of neuropeptides in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of nocturnal and diurnal rodents.

    Hugues Dardente;Jérôme S Menet;Etienne Challet;Benjamin B Tournier

  • Forebrain oscillators ticking with different clock hands.

    Céline A. Feillet;Jorge Mendoza;Urs Albrecht;Paul Pévet

  • Phase-Advanced Daily Rhythms of Melatonin, Body Temperature, and Locomotor Activity in Food-Restricted Rats Fed during Daytime

    E. Challet;P. Pevet;B. Vivien-Roels;A. Malan

  • The Cerebellum Harbors a Circadian Oscillator Involved in Food Anticipation

    Jorge Mendoza;Paul Pévet;Marie-Paule Felder-Schmittbuhl;Yannick Bailly

  • Circadian profile and photic regulation of clock genes in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of a diurnal mammal Arvicanthis ansorgei.

    Caldelas I;Poirel Vj;Sicard B;Pévet P

  • Interactions between photic and nonphotic stimuli to synchronize the master circadian clock in mammals.

    Etienne Challet;Paul Pévet

  • Interactions between metabolism and circadian clocks: reciprocal disturbances.

    Julien Delezie;Etienne Challet

  • Circadian insights into dopamine mechanisms.

    J. Mendoza;E. Challet

  • ''Feeding time'' for the brain: A matter of clocks

    Céline A. Feillet;Urs Albrecht;Etienne Challet

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Pévet
Paul Pévet University of Strasbourg
Andries Kalsbeek
Andries Kalsbeek University of Amsterdam
Fred W. Turek
Fred W. Turek Northwestern University
Urs Albrecht
Urs Albrecht University of Fribourg
Carolina Escobar
Carolina Escobar National Autonomous University of Mexico
Caroline Graff
Caroline Graff Karolinska University Hospital
Ruud M. Buijs
Ruud M. Buijs National Autonomous University of Mexico
Ralph E. Mistlberger
Ralph E. Mistlberger Simon Fraser University
Shigenobu Shibata
Shigenobu Shibata Waseda University
Susanne E. la Fleur
Susanne E. la Fleur University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Neuroscience may also want to explore online degrees in related fields such as psychology, social work, and therapy. These programs offer flexible learning options and can often be pursued at your own pace.

For those seeking a strong foundation in human behavior, an online degree psychology program is a popular, affordable option. Psychology studies complement neuroscience, preparing graduates for diverse roles or further study.

If a career in therapy or clinical work appeals to you, consider looking into how long does it take to get a msw online. Earning a Master of Social Work online can open doors to counseling and mental health advocacy.

For advanced practice, a online psyd program provides clinical doctorate-level training ideal for those who wish to become licensed psychologists. Alternatively, those interested in therapy for couples and families may consider marriage and family therapy programs online to specialize in that growing field.

Exploring these online degrees can help you find the right career pathway that aligns with your interests in neuroscience and related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Etienne Challet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles