World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
31
Citations
3920
World Ranking
9581
National Ranking
4052

Colleen M. Novak publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colleen M. Novak sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 84 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Colleen M. Novak D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colleen M. Novak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Colleen M. Novak is affiliated with Kent State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and neuroscience, focusing predominantly on physiology and metabolic processes.

Their recent publications demonstrate engagement with diverse topics in experimental biology and health sciences. Some notable papers include:

  • Statin Drugs Plus Th1 Cytokines Potentiate Apoptosis and Ras Delocalization in Human Breast Cancer Lines and Combine with Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy to Suppress Tumor Growth in a Mouse Model of HER-2pos Disease, 2020, Vaccines
  • Skeletal muscle thermogenesis induction by exposure to predator odor, 2020, Journal of Experimental Biology
  • Enhanced weight and fat loss from long-term intermittent fasting in obesity-prone, low-fitness rats, 2020, Physiology & Behavior
  • Aerobic capacity modulates adaptive thermogenesis: Contribution of non-resting energy expenditure, 2020, Physiology & Behavior
  • Reduced contextually induced muscle thermogenesis in rats with calorie restriction and lower aerobic fitness but not monogenic obesity, 2023, Temperature

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Erin Gorrell
  • Ashley Shemery
  • Lauren G. Koch
  • Steven L. Britton
  • Christina A. Watts

Colleen M. Novak's research often appears in these publication venues:

  • Physiology & Behavior
  • F1000Research
  • Journal of Visualized Experiments
  • Vaccines
  • Journal of Experimental Biology

The main fields of study covered in their work are:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Within these broad areas, subfields of focus include:

  • Physiology
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Epidemiology
  • Rehabilitation

Their research topics emphasize:

  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Dietary Effects on Health
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Best Publications

  • The use of a running wheel to measure activity in rodents: relationship to energy balance, general activity, and reward.

    Colleen M. Novak;Paul R. Burghardt;James A. Levine

  • The enzyme CD38 (a NAD glycohydrolase, EC 3.2.2.5) is necessary for the development of diet-induced obesity

    Maria Thereza P. Barbosa;Sandra M. Soares;Colleen M. Novak;David Sinclair

  • Transgenic expression of cholesterol 7α‐hydroxylase in the liver prevents high‐fat diet–induced obesity and insulin resistance in mice

    Tiangang Li;Erika Owsley;Michelle Matozel;Peter Hsu

  • Deleted in breast cancer-1 regulates SIRT1 activity and contributes to high-fat diet-induced liver steatosis in mice

    Carlos Escande;Claudia C S Chini;Veronica Nin;Katherine Minter Dykhouse

  • Caloric restriction and physical activity in zebrafish (Danio rerio)

    Colleen M. Novak;Xiaoling Jiang;Chuanfeng Wang;Jennifer A. Teske

  • Central orexin sensitivity, physical activity, and obesity in diet-induced obese and diet-resistant rats

    Colleen M. Novak;Catherine M. Kotz;Catherine M. Kotz;James A. Levine;James A. Levine

  • Loss of FXR Protects against Diet-Induced Obesity and Accelerates Liver Carcinogenesis in ob/ob Mice

    Yanqiao Zhang;Xuemei Ge;Lydia A. Heemstra;Wei-Dong Chen

  • Evaluation of a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging system for whole body composition analysis in rodents.

    Joshua P. Nixon;Minzhi Zhang;Chuanfeng Wang;Chuanfeng Wang;Michael A. Kuskowski

  • Orexin A mediation of time spent moving in rats: neural mechanisms.

    Catherine M Kotz;Catherine M Kotz;ChuanFeng Wang;J. A. Teske;A. J. Thorpe

  • Spontaneous activity, economy of activity, and resistance to diet-induced obesity in rats bred for high intrinsic aerobic capacity

    Colleen M. Novak;Colleen M. Novak;Carlos Escande;Paul R. Burghardt;Minzhi Zhang

  • Actions of testosterone in prepubertal and postpubertal male hamsters: dissociation of effects on reproductive behavior and brain androgen receptor immunoreactivity

    Leslie R. Meek;Russell D. Romeo;Colleen M. Novak;Cheryl L. Sisk

  • Daily rhythms in Fos activity in the rat ventrolateral preoptic area and midline thalamic nuclei.

    Colleen M. Novak;Antonio A. Nunez

  • Galectin-3 Stimulates Preadipocyte Proliferation and Is Up-regulated in Growing Adipose Tissue

    Kohji Kiwaki;Colleen M. Novak;Daniel K. Hsu;Fu Tong Liu

  • Central neural and endocrine mechanisms of non-exercise activity thermogenesis and their potential impact on obesity.

    C. M. Novak;J. A. Levine

  • Enhanced sympathetic activity in mice with brown adipose tissue transplantation (transBATation)

    Zheng Zhu;Elizabeth G. Spicer;Chaitanya K. Gavini;Ashley J. Goudjo-Ako

  • Leanness and heightened nonresting energy expenditure: role of skeletal muscle activity thermogenesis

    Chaitanya K. Gavini;Sromona Mukherjee;Charu Shukla;Steven L. Britton

  • Rhythms in Fos expression in brain areas related to the sleep-wake cycle in the diurnal Arvicanthis niloticus

    Colleen M. Novak;Laura Smale;Antonio A. Nunez

  • Suprachiasmatic nucleus projections to the paraventricular thalamic nucleus in nocturnal rats (Rattus norvegicus) and diurnal nile grass rats (Arviacanthis niloticus).

    Colleen M. Novak;Julie A. Harris;Laura Smale;Antonio A. Nunez

  • Endurance capacity, not body size, determines physical activity levels: role of skeletal muscle PEPCK.

    Colleen M. Novak;Colleen M. Novak;Carlos Escande;Susan M. Gerber;Eduardo N. Chini

  • Novel phase-shifting effects of GABAA receptor activation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of a diurnal rodent.

    C. M. Novak;H. E. Albers

Frequent Co-Authors

James A. Levine
James A. Levine Mayo Clinic
Catherine M. Kotz
Catherine M. Kotz University of Minnesota
H. Elliott Albers
H. Elliott Albers Georgia State University
Karen L. Gamble
Karen L. Gamble University of Alabama at Birmingham
Eduardo N. Chini
Eduardo N. Chini Mayo Clinic
Charles J. Billington
Charles J. Billington University of Minnesota
Cheryl L. Sisk
Cheryl L. Sisk Michigan State University
Victor J. Hruby
Victor J. Hruby University of Arizona
Joel N. Hirschhorn
Joel N. Hirschhorn Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Neuroscience, exploring related online degrees and career pathways can open additional opportunities in health and behavioral sciences. Fields like social work, psychology, and behavior analysis often overlap with neuroscience, especially in research, counseling, and healthcare environments.

Affordable education is a key concern. Many students look for the cheapest msw programs online to start a career in social work, blending a neuroscience background with clinical skills. If you’re interested in behavior analysis, consider exploring bcba programs online to become a certified behavior analyst.

For those who want to progress quickly, fast track social work degree online programs can help you enter the workforce sooner. Likewise, pursuing accelerated psychology programs online can be a smart way to connect neuroscience with mental health services in a shorter time frame.

These online pathways make it easier for students to balance education with work and life commitments, while preparing for rewarding careers related to neuroscience in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Colleen M. Novak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles