What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Endocrinology
- Gene
Paul Pévet mainly focuses on Endocrinology, Internal medicine, Melatonin, Circadian rhythm and Suprachiasmatic nucleus.
His study in Pineal gland, Period, Hypothalamus, Hamster and Hormone are all subfields of Endocrinology.
As a part of the same scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Internal medicine, focusing on Cell biology and, on occasion, Cell type and Regulation of gene expression.
His studies deal with areas such as Pars tuberalis, Receptor and photoperiodism as well as Melatonin.
His Circadian rhythm study frequently draws connections to other fields, such as Serotonin.
In his work, Nucleus is strongly intertwined with Vasoactive intestinal peptide, which is a subfield of Suprachiasmatic nucleus.
His most cited work include:
- Adrenergic signals direct rhythmic expression of transcriptional repressor CREM in the pineal gland (369 citations)
- Pituitary hormone FSH directs the CREM functional switch during spermatogenesis (233 citations)
- Melatonin: Both master clock output and internal time-giver in the circadian clocks network (218 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of study are Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Melatonin, Circadian rhythm and Pineal gland.
Period, PER1, Vasopressin, Serotonin and Endocrine gland are among the areas of Internal medicine where the researcher is concentrating his efforts.
In Endocrinology, he works on issues like photoperiodism, which are connected to Reproduction and Testosterone.
His Melatonin research integrates issues from Receptor and Pars tuberalis.
His Circadian rhythm study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Nocturnal and Rhythm.
His study in the field of Arylalkylamine also crosses realms of Darkness.
He most often published in these fields:
- Internal medicine (80.42%)
- Endocrinology (79.72%)
- Melatonin (48.82%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2006-2021)?
- Internal medicine (80.42%)
- Endocrinology (79.72%)
- Circadian rhythm (41.98%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Circadian rhythm, Melatonin and Circadian clock are his primary areas of study.
His research ties photoperiodism and Endocrinology together.
His study in CLOCK, Suprachiasmatic nucleus, Light effects on circadian rhythm, PER1 and PER2 is carried out as part of his studies in Circadian rhythm.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Pinealocyte and Bacterial circadian rhythms.
In the subject of general Melatonin, his work in Pinealectomy is often linked to Darkness, thereby combining diverse domains of study.
His Circadian clock research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Entrainment, Chronobiotic and Chronobiology.
Between 2006 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Melatonin: Both master clock output and internal time-giver in the circadian clocks network (218 citations)
- RFamide-related peptide gene is a melatonin-driven photoperiodic gene. (157 citations)
- High‐fat feeding alters the clock synchronization to light (154 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Gene
- Endocrinology
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Circadian rhythm, Circadian clock and Melatonin.
His Endocrinology research includes themes of Nocturnal, Regulation of gene expression and Neuropeptide Y receptor.
His Circadian rhythm study is concerned with Neuroscience in general.
His study looks at the relationship between Circadian clock and fields such as Chronobiotic, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.
His Melatonin research includes elements of Sex steroid, Reproduction, Neuropeptide, photoperiodism and Hamster.
His studies examine the connections between Light effects on circadian rhythm and genetics, as well as such issues in Pineal gland, with regards to Zeitgeber.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
