World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frederick J. Boehmke

Frederick J. Boehmke

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
21
Citations
3037
World Ranking
1903
National Ranking
953

Frederick J. Boehmke publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick J. Boehmke sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 17 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 133 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Frederick J. Boehmke D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick J. Boehmke sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 73 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 21 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion

    Frederick J. Boehmke;Richard Witmer

  • Strategic Voting In British Elections

    R. Michael Alvarez;Frederick J. Boehmke;Jonathan Nagler

  • Selection Bias and Continuous‐Time Duration Models: Consequences and a Proposed Solution

    Frederick J. Boehmke;Daniel S. Morey;Megan Shannon

  • State Policy Innovativeness Revisited

    Frederick J. Boehmke;Paul Skinner

  • Persistent Policy Pathways: Inferring Diffusion Networks in the American States

    Bruce A. Desmarais;Jeffrey J. Harden;Frederick J. Boehmke

  • The Indirect Effect of Direct Legislation : How Institutions Shape Interest Group Systems

    Frederick J. Boehmke

  • The Effect of Direct Democracy on the Size and Diversity of State Interest Group Populations

    Frederick J. Boehmke

  • Policy Emulation or Policy Convergence? Potential Ambiguities in the Dyadic Event History Approach to State Policy Emulation

    Frederick J. Boehmke

  • Approaches to Modeling the Adoption and Diffusion of Policies with Multiple Components

    Frederick J. Boehmke

  • Business as usual: interest group access and representation across policy-making venues

    Frederick J. Boehmke;Sean Gailmard;John W. Patty

  • Whose Ear to Bend? Information Sources and Venue Choice in Policy-Making

    Frederick J. Boehmke;Sean Gailmard;John Wiggs Patty

  • The Influence of International Organizations on Militarized Dispute Initiation and Duration1

    Megan Shannon;Daniel Morey;Frederick J. Boehmke

  • Sources of Variation in the Frequency of Statewide Initiatives: The Role of Interest Group Populations:

    Frederick J. Boehmke

  • Direct Democracy and Individual Interest Group Membership

    Frederick J. Boehmke;Daniel C. Bowen

  • Waiting to Vote in the 2016 Presidential Election: Evidence from a Multi-county Study:

    Robert M. Stein;Christopher Mann;Charles Stewart;Zachary Birenbaum

  • SPID: A New Database for Inferring Public Policy Innovativeness and Diffusion Networks

    Frederick J. Boehmke;Mark Brockway;Bruce A. Desmarais;Jeffrey J. Harden

  • Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. By Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier and Bradford S. Jones. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

    Frederick J. Boehmke

  • Modeling Heterogeneity in Pooled Event History Analysis

    Rebecca J. Kreitzer;Frederick J. Boehmke

  • Oversight Capabilities in the States Are Professionalized Legislatures Better at Getting What They Want

    Frederick J. Boehmke;Charles R. Shipan

  • American Indian political incorporation in the post-Indian Gaming Regulatory Act era

    Richard Witmer;Frederick J. Boehmke

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below: