World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Caroline J. Tolbert

Caroline J. Tolbert

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
45
Citations
12772
World Ranking
337
National Ranking
194

Caroline J. Tolbert publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline J. Tolbert sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 17 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 139 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Caroline J. Tolbert D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline J. Tolbert sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 73 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Caroline J. Tolbert is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of social sciences, with a significant focus on political science and international relations. Additional subfields include economics and econometrics, communication, gender studies, and sociology and political science.

Their main research topics cover electoral systems and political participation, social media and politics, policy transfer and learning, gender politics and representation, ICT impact and policies, public policy and administration research, and economic and environmental valuation.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Tolbert include:

  • "A new measure of digital economic activity and its impact on local opportunity" (2021, Telecommunications Policy)
  • "Digital economic activity and resilience for metros and small businesses during Covid-19" (2022, Small Business Economics)
  • "Digital Citizenship and Digital Communities" (2020, International Journal of E-Planning Research)
  • "Understanding Preferences for Comprehensive Electoral Reform in the United States" (2022, Social Science Quarterly)
  • "Demographic differences in understanding and utilization of ranked choice voting" (2022, Social Science Quarterly)

Frequent coauthors associated with Tolbert include:

  • Todd Donovan
  • Nathan K. Micatka
  • Karen Mossberger
  • Daria Kuznetsova
  • Scott LaCombe

Tolbert has published extensively in several academic venues, with notable frequent publications in:

  • Social Science Quarterly
  • Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy
  • Representation
  • American Politics Research
  • Harvard Dataverse

In addition to articles, Tolbert has contributed to book publications. One such publication is "Accessible Elections", published by Oxford University Press in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation

    Karen Mossberger;Caroline J. Tolbert;Ramona S. McNeal

  • The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government

    Caroline J. Tolbert;Karen Mossberger

  • Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide

    Karen Mossberger;Caroline J. Tolbert;Mary Stansbury

  • Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation

    Caroline J. Tolbert;Ramona S. Mcneal

  • Educated by Initiative: The Effects of Direct Democracy on Citizens and Political Organizations in the American States

    Daniel A. Smith;Caroline J. Tolbert

  • Institutions, Policy Innovation, and E-Government in the American States

    Caroline J. Tolbert;Karen Mossberger;Ramona McNeal

  • A racial/ethnic diversity interpretation of politics and policy in the states of the U.S.

    Rodney E. Hero;Caroline J. Tolbert

  • Race/Ethnicity and Direct Democracy: An Analysis of California's Illegal Immigration Initiative

    Caroline J. Tolbert;Rodney E. Hero

  • Latinos and substantive representation in the U.S. House of Representatives: Direct, indirect, or nonexistent?

    Rodney E. Hero;Caroline J. Tolbert

  • CITIZENS AS LEGISLATORS: DIRECT DEMOCRACY IN THE UNITED STATES

    Shaun Bowler;Todd Donovan;Caroline J. Tolbert

  • The Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout in the American States

    Caroline J. Tolbert;John A. Grummel;Daniel A. Smith

  • Enhancing Civic Engagement: The Effect of Direct Democracy on Political Participation and Knowledge

    Caroline J. Tolbert;Ramona S. McNeal;Daniel A. Smith

  • Innovating in Digital Government in the American States

    Ramona S. McNeal;Caroline J. Tolbert;Karen Mossberger;Lisa J. Dotterweich

  • Race, Place, and Information Technology

    Karen Mossberger;Caroline J. Tolbert;Michele Gilbert

  • The Educative Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout

    Caroline J. Tolbert;Daniel A. Smith

  • Do Institutions Really Matter? Taxation in Industrialized Democracies

    Sven Steinmo;Caroline J. Tolbert

  • Inequality, Self-Interest, and Public Support for “Robin Hood” Tax Policies:

    William Franko;Caroline J. Tolbert;Christopher Witko

  • Revisiting the Racial Threat Hypothesis:“White Voter Support for California’s Proposition 209

    Caroline J. Tolbert

  • The Initiative to Party Partisanship and Ballot Initiatives in California

    Daniel A. Smith;Caroline J. Tolbert

  • Dealing with Diversity: Racial/Ethnic Context and Social Policy Change

    Caroline J. Tolbert;Rodney E. Hero

  • Broadband Adoption| Measuring Digital Citizenship: Mobile Access and Broadband

    Karen Mossberger;Caroline J. Tolbert;Allison Hamilton

  • Does Policy Adoption Change Opinions on Minority Rights? The Effects of Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage

    Rebecca J. Kreitzer;Allison J. Hamilton;Caroline J. Tolbert

  • Educated by Initiative

    Daniel A. Smith;Caroline Tolbert

  • Race, Place, and Information Technology

    Karen Mossberger;Caroline J. Tolbert

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel A. Smith
Daniel A. Smith University of Florida
Todd Donovan
Todd Donovan Western Washington University
David P. Redlawsk
David P. Redlawsk University of Delaware
Rodney E. Hero
Rodney E. Hero Arizona State University
Shaun Bowler
Shaun Bowler University of California, Riverside
Jeffrey A. Karp
Jeffrey A. Karp Brunel University London
Peverill Squire
Peverill Squire University of Missouri
John C. Green
John C. Green University of Akron
Richard S. Katz
Richard S. Katz Johns Hopkins University
Matt A. Barreto
Matt A. Barreto University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Political Science graduates often find that their interests and skills align with a diverse array of academic and career paths. In today’s digital learning landscape, many students explore online math degrees to enhance their analytical thinking and quantitative research skills—valuable assets in political data analysis and public policy roles.

For those drawn to managing information or organizing resources, pursuing a degree from the best colleges for library science can open doors to careers in research institutions, government agencies, and academic libraries.

Students interested in contextualizing political systems may be curious about how to get a degree in history. History programs provide critical insights into political evolution, diplomacy, and international relations.

Additionally, for individuals seeking a broad, customizable education, interdisciplinary studies online programs offer flexibility to combine politics, economics, communication, and more. These alternatives empower students to tailor their expertise for roles in government, non-profits, education, or consulting.

Best Scientists Citing Caroline J. Tolbert

Trending Scientists