World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 40 1672 1564 701 641 181 7477

Christopher G. Reddick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christopher G. Reddick between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christopher G. Reddick published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 11.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2011. 15 of the 265 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2011. 2003: 8 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 6 publications
2003 2025

265 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christopher G. Reddick: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 8
2004 7
2005 5
2006 8
2007 12
2008 24
2009 13
2010 20
2011 25
2012 19
2013 13
2014 10
2015 11
2016 11
2017 12
2018 10
2019 9
2020 12
2021 6
2022 7
2023 8
2024 9
2025 6
Total 265
Download as CSV

Christopher G. Reddick publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher G. Reddick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 180–184 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 181 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47 181
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Christopher G. Reddick D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher G. Reddick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81 40
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Christopher G. Reddick is affiliated with The University of Texas at San Antonio in the United States. Their research contributions span multiple disciplines within the social sciences, engineering, and business management. The main fields of study for their work include Social Sciences with 27 publications, Engineering with 17, and Business, Management and Accounting with 16.

Their research delves into various subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Media Technology, Information Systems and Management, Public Administration, and Economics and Econometrics. Key topics addressed in their work include Ethics in Business and Education, Public Policy and Administration Research, ICT Impact and Policies, E-Government and Public Services, Process Optimization and Integration, Sharing Economy and Platforms, and Digital Economy and Work Transformation.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Christopher G. Reddick include:

  • Bruce J. Perlman
  • Tansu Demir
  • Roger Enriquez
  • Richard J. Harris
  • Mikhaïl Sorin

They have published in a variety of venues with multiple papers appearing in Administration & Society, Cities, Information Polity, Compensation & Benefits Review, and the International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age.

Selected recent papers demonstrate the scope of their research, including:

  • Determinants of broadband access and affordability: An analysis of a community survey on the digital divide (2020), published in Cities
  • Horizontal, Vertical, and Hybrid: An Empirical Look at the Forms of Accountability (2020), published in Administration & Society
  • Waste heat and renewable energy integration in buildings (2020), published in Energy and Buildings

In addition to journal articles, Christopher G. Reddick has contributed to book publications, such as a work titled Blockchain and the Public Sector published by Springer International Publishing in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers?

    Christopher G. Reddick

  • Local E‐Government in the United States: Transformation or Incremental Change?

    Donald F. Norris;Christopher G. Reddick

  • Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website

    Leonidas G. Anthopoulos;Christopher G. Reddick;Irene Giannakidou;Nikolaos Mavridis

  • A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities

    Christopher G. Reddick

  • Channel choice and public service delivery in Canada: Comparing e-government to traditional service delivery

    Christopher G. Reddick;Michael Turner

  • Prospects and challenges of sharing economy for the public sector

    Sukumar Ganapati;Christopher G. Reddick

  • A social media text analytics framework for double-loop learning for citizen-centric public services: A case study of a local government Facebook use

    Christopher G. Reddick;Akemi Takeoka Chatfield;Adegboyega Ojo

  • A framework for Internet of Things-enabled smart government: A case of IoT cybersecurity policies and use cases in U.S. federal government

    Akemi Takeoka Chatfield;Christopher G. Reddick

  • Social Media in Egyptian Government Websites: Presence, Usage, and Effectiveness

    Hisham M. E. Abdelsalam;Christopher G. Reddick;Sara Gamal;Abdoulrahman Al-shaar

  • Social media adoption at the American grass roots: Web 2.0 or 1.5?

    Christopher G. Reddick;Donald F. Norris

  • Citizen interaction and e‐government: Evidence for the managerial, consultative, and participatory models

    Christopher G. Reddick

  • Tweeting propaganda, radicalization and recruitment: Islamic state supporters multi-sided twitter networks

    Akemi Takeoka Chatfield;Christopher G. Reddick;Uuf Brajawidagda

  • Customer agility and responsiveness through big data analytics for public value creation: A case study of Houston 311 on-demand services

    Akemi Takeoka Chatfield;Christopher G. Reddick

  • Open e-government in U.S. state governments: Survey evidence from Chief Information Officers

    Sukumar Ganapati;Christopher G. Reddick

  • A longitudinal cross-sector analysis of open data portal service capability: The case of Australian local governments

    Akemi Takeoka Chatfield;Christopher G. Reddick

  • All hands on deck to tweet #sandy: Networked governance of citizen coproduction in turbulent times

    Akemi Takeoka Chatfield;Christopher G. Reddick

  • Understanding electronic government research and smart city: A framework and empirical evidence

    Leonidas G. Anthopoulos;Christopher G. Reddick

  • The adoption of centralized customer service systems: A survey of local governments

    Christopher G. Reddick

  • Interactions with e-government, new digital media and traditional channel choices: citizen-initiated factors

    Christopher Reddick;Leonidas Anthopoulos

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Business and Management opens various online pathways, catering to diverse career goals and budgets. Today’s students can choose from numerous cheap online masters programs that offer flexibility and affordability without compromising quality.

Data-driven decision making is in high demand across business sectors. Those interested in analytics may benefit from enrolling in top data science programs, which prepare graduates for roles in business intelligence, consulting, or strategic planning.

For those aiming at senior leadership or academic careers, earning a phd leadership online can provide advanced knowledge and credentials in organizational leadership, policy development, and management research.

It’s also important to choose a reputable institution. Prospective students can explore the top 10 online universities for accredited programs recognized by employers and professional bodies.

By considering these online degree options, you can align your education with your career ambitions while maintaining the flexibility to balance work, life, and study.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher G. Reddick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles