World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
123
Citations
66238
World Ranking
3308
National Ranking
1820

Patrick M. McCarthy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick M. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 817 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Patrick M. McCarthy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick M. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 123 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick M. McCarthy is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and specializes in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Their work encompasses several main topics including Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes, Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments, Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management, Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair, and Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches.

Among their recent publications are the following papers:

  • 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2023, Circulation
  • Transcatheter Repair for Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation, 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Utility of a Deep-Learning Algorithm to Guide Novices to Acquire Echocardiograms for Limited Diagnostic Use, 2021, JAMA Cardiology
  • Fully automated 3D aortic segmentation of 4D flow MRI for hemodynamic analysis using deep learning, 2020, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Patrick M. McCarthy has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
  • Journal of Cardiac Surgery

The scientist has collaborated extensively with other researchers, particularly with:

  • Jane Kruse (39 collaborations)
  • James L. Cox (31 collaborations)
  • Adin-Cristian Andrei (25 collaborations)
  • S. Chris Malaisrie (25 collaborations)
  • James D. Thomas (23 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

    Hugh Calkins;Karl Heinz Kuck;Riccardo Cappato;Josep Brugada

  • 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

    Hugh Calkins;Karl Heinz Kuck;Riccardo Cappato;Josep Brugada

  • HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Personnel, Policy, Procedures and Follow-Up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

    Hugh Calkins;Josep Brugada;Douglas L. Packer;Riccardo Cappato

  • HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

    Hugh Calkins;Josep Brugada;Douglas L. Packer;Ricardo Cappato

  • Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one.

    Bruce W. Lytle;Eugene H. Blackstone;Floyd D. Loop;Penny L. Houghtaling

  • High Prevalence of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Asymptomatic Teenagers and Young Adults Evidence From Intravascular Ultrasound

    E. Murat Tuzcu;Samir R. Kapadia;Eralp Tutar;Khaled M. Ziada

  • Tricuspid valve repair: Durability and risk factors for failure

    Patrick M McCarthy;Sunil K Bhudia;Jeevanantham Rajeswaran;Katherine J Hoercher

  • Durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease

    A.Marc Gillinov;Delos M. Cosgrove;Eugene H. Blackstone;Ramon Diaz

  • Impaired Myofibrillar Energetics and Oxidative Injury During Human Atrial Fibrillation

    Michael J. Mihm;Fushun Yu;Cynthia A. Carnes;Peter J. Reiser

  • Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation

    A.Marc Gillinov;Per Nils Wierup;Eugene H. Blackstone;Ehab S. Bishay

  • Recurrent mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation

    Edwin C. McGee;A. Marc Gillinov;Eugene H. Blackstone;Jeevanantham Rajeswaran

  • Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate vented electric left ventricular assist system in patients awaiting heart transplantation.

    O.H. Frazier;Eric A. Rose;Mehmet C. Oz;Walter Dembitsky

  • Atrial L-Type Ca2+ Currents and Human Atrial Fibrillation

    David R. Van Wagoner;Amber L. Pond;Michelle Lamorgese;Sandra S. Rossie

  • Outward K+ Current Densities and Kv1.5 Expression Are Reduced in Chronic Human Atrial Fibrillation

    David R. Van Wagoner;Amber L. Pond;Patrick M. McCarthy;James S. Trimmer

  • Ascorbate Attenuates Atrial Pacing-Induced Peroxynitrite Formation and Electrical Remodeling and Decreases the Incidence of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

    C. A. Carnes;M. K. Chung;T. Nakayama;H. Nakayama

  • Surgical ventricular restoration in the treatment of congestive heart failure due to post-infarction ventricular dilation.

    Constantine L. Athanasuleas;Gerald D. Buckberg;Alfred W.H. Stanley;William Siler

  • Predictors of severe right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion: analysis of 245 patients.

    Yoshie Ochiai;Patrick M. McCarthy;Nicholas G. Smedira;Michael K. Banbury

  • Axillary artery: An alternative site of arterial cannulation for patients with extensive aortic and peripheral vascular disease

    Joseph F. Sabik;Bruce W. Lytle;Patrick M. McCarthy;Delos M. Cosgrove

  • Aprotinin therapy for reoperative myocardial revascularization: A placebo-controlled study

    Delos Cosgrove;B. Heric;B. W. Lytle;P. C. Taylor

  • Geometric Differences of the Mitral Apparatus Between Ischemic and Dilated Cardiomyopathy With Significant Mitral Regurgitation Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography Study

    Jun Kwan;Takahiro Shiota;Deborah A. Agler;Zoran B. Popović

Frequent Co-Authors

Randall C. Starling
Randall C. Starling Cleveland Clinic
James B. Young
James B. Young Cleveland Clinic
Nicholas G. Smedira
Nicholas G. Smedira Cleveland Clinic
James D. Thomas
James D. Thomas Northwestern University
Delos M. Cosgrove
Delos M. Cosgrove Cleveland Clinic
Eugene H. Blackstone
Eugene H. Blackstone Cleveland Clinic
A. Marc Gillinov
A. Marc Gillinov Cleveland Clinic
Michael Markl
Michael Markl Northwestern University
Bruce W. Lytle
Bruce W. Lytle Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital
Robert O. Bonow
Robert O. Bonow Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up diverse online degree and career options. Nursing continues to be a popular pathway, especially for those interested in patient care or looking for flexible, affordable study options. For registered nurses seeking to advance, the most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs offer a streamlined way to boost qualifications without stepping away from work.

Non-nurses considering a swift transition to the healthcare sector can look into direct entry msn online programs, which are designed for accelerated entry into advanced nursing roles. Alternatively, prospective nurses often wonder about what is the easiest nursing school to get into, especially if admission requirements are a concern.

Those interested in the administrative side of healthcare can check out medical billing and coding financial aid resources, which provide affordable training options in a rapidly growing field. These pathways offer flexibility, financial aid, and a broad range of opportunities for those eager to join the healthcare industry online.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick M. McCarthy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles