World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Randall C. Starling

Randall C. Starling

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
121
Citations
61299
World Ranking
3574
National Ranking
1968

Randall C. Starling publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randall C. Starling sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,000 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Randall C. Starling D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randall C. Starling sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Randall C. Starling is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, focusing primarily on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research spans several key subfields including surgery, biomedical engineering, emergency medicine, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The scientist's scholarly output includes work in the following main research areas:

  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes

Among the recent publications associated with Randall C. Starling are:

  • Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure (2021), published in European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy: current evidence and future directions (2020), published in Nature Reviews Cardiology
  • Heart failure and COVID-19 (2020), published in Heart Failure Reviews
  • Heart Failure Association of the ESC, Heart Failure Society of America and Japanese Heart Failure Society Position statement on endomyocardial biopsy (2021), published in European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Updated definitions of adverse events for trials and registries of mechanical circulatory support: A consensus statement of the mechanical circulatory support academic research consortium (2020), published in The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

Randall C. Starling has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • W.H. Wilson Tang
  • Jerry D. Estep
  • Edward G. Soltesz
  • Αndrew Xanthopoulos
  • Robert J. Mentz

The scientist's work is published prominently in venues such as:

  • Journal of Cardiac Failure
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • Circulation
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature

This profile reflects a comprehensive engagement with cardiology research and related biomedical fields, marked by collaborations and publications in highly specialized journals. The emphasis on mechanical circulatory support devices and heart failure management highlights significant thematic areas within their scientific activities.

Best Publications

  • The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients

    Maria Rosa Costanzo;Anne Dipchand;Randall Starling;Allen Anderson

  • Importance of Venous Congestion for Worsening of Renal Function in Advanced Decompensated Heart Failure

    Wilfried Mullens;Zuheir Abrahams;Gary S. Francis;George Sokos

  • HFSA 2010 Comprehensive Heart Failure Practice Guideline.

    Lindenfeld J;Albert Nm;Boehmer Jp

  • Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

    C. M. O'Connor;R. C. Starling;A. F. Hernandez;P. W. Armstrong

  • Everolimus for the prevention of allograft rejection and vasculopathy in cardiac-transplant recipients.

    Howard J. Eisen;E. Murat Tuzcu;Richard Dorent;Jon Kobashigawa

  • The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology.

    Leslie T. Cooper;Kenneth L. Baughman;Arthur M. Feldman;Andrea Frustaci

  • The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology. Endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Leslie T. Cooper;Kenneth L. Baughman;Arthur M. Feldman;Andrea Frustaci

  • Listing criteria for heart transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for the care of cardiac transplant candidates--2006.

    Mandeep R. Mehra;Jon Kobashigawa;Randall Starling;Stuart Russell

  • Executive summary: HFSA 2006 comprehensive heart failure practice guideline

    Kirkwood F. Adams;Jo Ann Lindenfeld;J. Malcolm O. Arnold;David W. Baker

  • Clinical management of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices in advanced heart failure

    Mark S. Slaughter;Francis D. Pagani;Joseph G. Rogers;Leslie W. Miller

  • Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure: Endorsed by the Canadian Heart Failure Society, Heart Failure Association of India, Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, and Chinese Heart Failure Association.

    Biykem Bozkurt;Andrew J.S. Coats;Hiroyuki Tsutsui;Ca Magdy Abdelhamid

  • Pulmonary-vein isolation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure.

    Mohammed N. Khan;Pierre Jaïs;Jennifer Cummings;Luigi Di Biase;Luigi Di Biase

  • International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulation of a standardized nomenclature for cardiac allograft vasculopathy—2010

    Mandeep R. Mehra;Maria G. Crespo-Leiro;Anne Dipchand;Stephan M. Ensminger

  • Unexpected Abrupt Increase in Left Ventricular Assist Device Thrombosis

    Randall C. Starling;Nader Moazami;Scott C. Silvestry;Gregory Ewald

  • Myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy: current evidence and future directions.

    Carsten Tschöpe;Enrico Ammirati;Biykem Bozkurt;Biykem Bozkurt;Alida L.P. Caforio

  • Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition Compared With Enalapril on the Risk of Clinical Progression in Surviving Patients With Heart Failure

    Milton Packer;John J. V. McMurray;Akshay S. Desai;Jianjian Gong

  • Controlled trial of intravenous immune globulin in recent-onset dilated cardiomyopathy

    Dennis M. McNamara;Richard Holubkov;Randall C. Starling;G. William Dec

  • Results of the Post-U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Approval Study With a Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation: A Prospective Study Using the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support)

    Randall C. Starling;Yoshifumi Naka;Andrew J. Boyle;Gonzalo Gonzalez-Stawinski

  • HFSA 2006 comprehensive heart failure practice guideline

    Kirkwood F. Adams;Jo Ann Lindenfeld;J. Malcolm O. Arnold;David W. Baker

  • 555 Importance of venous congestion for worsening of renal function in advanced decompensated heart failure

    W. Mullens;Z. Abrahams;G. Francis;G. Sokos

Frequent Co-Authors

James B. Young
James B. Young Cleveland Clinic
Patrick M. McCarthy
Patrick M. McCarthy Northwestern University
Nicholas G. Smedira
Nicholas G. Smedira Cleveland Clinic
W.H. Wilson Tang
W.H. Wilson Tang Cleveland Clinic
Adrian F. Hernandez
Adrian F. Hernandez Duke University
Paul W. Armstrong
Paul W. Armstrong University of Alberta
Justin A. Ezekowitz
Justin A. Ezekowitz University of Alberta
John J.V. McMurray
John J.V. McMurray University of Glasgow
Javed Butler
Javed Butler University of Mississippi

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online programs is an increasingly popular pathway for those interested in entering or advancing within the medical field. Flexible learning options allow working professionals and students to balance education with personal commitments. For example, dnp programs online are ideal for nurses seeking a Doctor of Nursing Practice credential, offering both academic rigor and convenience.

If you’re looking for a faster entry point into the healthcare workforce, a lpn accelerated program can provide a streamlined path to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse. For those passionate about mental health, a fast track mental health nursing degree delivers specialized training and opens doors to rewarding psychiatric care roles.

Administration is another crucial aspect of healthcare. If you are interested in leadership or operational roles, a healthcare administration degree online offers affordability and flexibility, equipping graduates for diverse management positions.

These online degrees and programs provide multiple entry points and career advancement opportunities across the evolving landscape of medicine in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Randall C. Starling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles