World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 64 7982 7236 456 411 138 16016

David Fairen-Jimenez publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Fairen-Jimenez between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Fairen-Jimenez published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2022. 21 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2022. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 20 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Fairen-Jimenez: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 4
2007 1
2008 1
2009 2
2010 2
2011 3
2012 7
2013 9
2014 8
2015 13
2016 10
2017 9
2018 17
2019 8
2020 13
2021 20
2022 23
2023 8
2024 17
2025 20
2026 1
Total 197
Download as CSV

David Fairen-Jimenez publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Fairen-Jimenez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 138 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918 138
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

David Fairen-Jimenez D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Fairen-Jimenez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731 64
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David Fairen-Jimenez is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Materials Science and Chemistry, with a total of 114 publications in Materials Science and 67 publications in Chemistry.

Their work is notably concentrated in several subfields, including Materials Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, with 79 and 55 publications respectively. Other areas of study include Biomedical Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, and Biomaterials.

David Fairen-Jimenez's research topics emphasize Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) and their synthesis and applications, which is covered in 100 publications. Additional subjects of investigation include Covalent Organic Framework Applications, X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography, Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics, Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery, Crystallization and Solubility Studies, and the use of Machine Learning in Materials Science.

The scientist has contributed to a significant number of papers in various highly regarded scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (10 publications)
  • The Cambridge Structural Database (9 publications)
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (5 publications)
  • Matter (5 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (5 publications)

Among recent papers by David Fairen-Jimenez are:

  • 25 Years of Reticular Chemistry, 2021, published in Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • Materials Informatics with PoreBlazer v4.0 and the CSD MOF Database, 2020, published in Chemistry of Materials
  • An open-access database and analysis tool for perovskite solar cells based on the FAIR data principles, 2021, published in Nature Energy
  • Shaping the Future of Fuel: Monolithic Metal-Organic Frameworks for High-Density Gas Storage, 2020, published in Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • Targeted classification of metal-organic frameworks in the Cambridge structural database (CSD), 2020, published in Chemical Science

David Fairen-Jimenez collaborates frequently with other researchers. Notable coauthors include:

  • David G. Madden (20 collaborations)
  • Rocío Bueno-Pérez (16 collaborations)
  • Nakul Rampal (13 collaborations)
  • Xu Chen (12 collaborations)
  • Ross S. Forgan (12 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • Opening the Gate: Framework Flexibility in ZIF-8 Explored by Experiments and Simulations

    D. Fairen-Jimenez;Stephen Moggach;M. T. Wharmby;P. A. Wright

  • Development of a Cambridge Structural Database Subset: A Collection of Metal-Organic Frameworks for Past, Present, and Future

    Peyman Z. Moghadam;Aurelia Li;Seth B. Wiggin;Andi Tao

  • Vapor-Phase Metalation by Atomic Layer Deposition in a Metal–Organic Framework

    Joseph E. Mondloch;Wojciech Bury;Wojciech Bury;David Fairen-Jimenez;David Fairen-Jimenez;Stephanie Kwon

  • A sol–gel monolithic metal–organic framework with enhanced methane uptake

    Tian Tian;Zhixin Zeng;Diana Vulpe;Mirian Elizabeth Casco

  • Amorphous metal-organic frameworks for drug delivery

    Claudia Orellana-Tavra;Emma F Baxter;Tian Tian;Thomas Douglas Bennett

  • 25 Years of Reticular Chemistry.

    Ralph Freund;Stefano Canossa;Seth M. Cohen;Wei Yan

  • Selective Surface PEGylation of UiO-66 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Stability, Cell Uptake, and pH-Responsive Drug Delivery.

    Isabel Abánades Lázaro;Salame Haddad;Sabrina Sacca;Claudia Orellana-Tavra

  • Temperature Treatment of Highly Porous Zirconium-Containing Metal-Organic Frameworks Extends Drug Delivery Release

    Michelle H. Teplensky;Marcus Fantham;Peng Li;Timothy C. Wang

  • Materials Informatics with PoreBlazer v4.0 and the CSD MOF Database

    Lev Sarkisov;Rocio Bueno-Perez;Mythili Sutharson;David Fairen-Jimenez

  • An open-access database and analysis tool for perovskite solar cells based on the FAIR data principles

    Unknown

  • Incorporation of an A1/A2-difunctionalized pillar[5]arene into a metal-organic framework

    Nathan L. Strutt;David Fairen-Jimenez;Julien Iehl;Marianne B. Lalonde

  • Screening of bio-compatible metal–organic frameworks as potential drug carriers using Monte Carlo simulations

    María C. Bernini;María C. Bernini;David Fairen-Jimenez;David Fairen-Jimenez;Marcelo Pasinetti;Antonio J. Ramirez-Pastor

  • Metal-organic framework thin films composed of free-standing acicular nanorods exhibiting reversible electrochromism

    Chung Wei Kung;Timothy Chiaan Wang;Joseph E. Mondloch;David Fairen-Jimenez

  • Tuning porosity in macroscopic monolithic metal-organic frameworks for exceptional natural gas storage.

    Bethany M. Connolly;Marta Aragones-Anglada;Jesús Gandara-Loe;Nader Al Danaf

  • Metal–Organic Nanosheets Formed via Defect-Mediated Transformation of a Hafnium Metal–Organic Framework

    Matthew J. Cliffe;Elizabeth Castillo-Martínez;Yue Wu;Jeongjae Lee

  • Structure-mechanical stability relations of metal-organic frameworks via machine learning

    Peyman Z. Moghadam;Sven M.J. Rogge;Aurelia Li;Chun-Man Chow

  • Shaping the Future of Fuel: Monolithic Metal-Organic Frameworks for High-Density Gas Storage.

    Bethany M. Connolly;David Gerard Madden;Andrew E. H. Wheatley;David Fairen-Jimenez

  • Flexibility and swing effect on the adsorption of energy-related gases on ZIF-8: combined experimental and simulation study.

    David Fairen-Jimenez;Raimondas Galvelis;Antonio Torrisi;Alistair D. Gellan

  • Granular and monolithic activated carbons from KOH-activation of olive stones

    Ruth Ubago-Pérez;Francisco Carrasco-Marín;David Fairén-Jiménez;Carlos Moreno-Castilla

  • Elucidating the breathing of the metal-organic framework MIL-53(Sc) with ab initio molecular dynamics simulations and in situ X-ray powder diffraction experiments.

    Linjiang Chen;John P. S. Mowat;David Fairen-Jimenez;Carole A. Morrison

  • Water‐Stable Zirconium‐Based Metal–Organic Framework Material with High‐Surface Area and Gas‐Storage Capacities

    Oleksii V. Gutov;Wojciech Bury;Wojciech Bury;Diego A. Gomez-Gualdron;Vaiva Krungleviciute;Vaiva Krungleviciute

Frequent Co-Authors

Omar K. Farha
Omar K. Farha Northwestern University
Randall Q. Snurr
Randall Q. Snurr Northwestern University
Joseph T. Hupp
Joseph T. Hupp Northwestern University
Joaquín Silvestre-Albero
Joaquín Silvestre-Albero University of Alicante
Francisco Carrasco-Marín
Francisco Carrasco-Marín University of Granada
Carlos Moreno-Castilla
Carlos Moreno-Castilla University of Granada
Paul A. Wright
Paul A. Wright University of St Andrews
Giorgio Divitini
Giorgio Divitini Italian Institute of Technology
Paul A. Midgley
Paul A. Midgley University of Cambridge
Thomas D. Bennett
Thomas D. Bennett University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying chemistry in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths, especially in forensic science and related fields. Many students pursue specialized training by enrolling in a forensic degree online to gain the skills necessary for crime lab work, including chemical analysis and evidence testing.

For those interested in deeper psychological aspects of crime investigations, an online master's in forensic psychology offers advanced knowledge of criminal behavior and mental health evaluations, adding a valuable dimension to forensic expertise.

The forensic science field presents diverse opportunities, from laboratory analysis to law enforcement collaboration. Detailed insights into various roles can be found under forensic science careers, highlighting required education, skills, and job outlook.

For those looking to enter technical roles, understanding the autopsy technician salary and education requirements helps in evaluating viable career options within forensic pathology support.

Best Scientists Citing David Fairen-Jimenez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles