World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 106 6477 6094 3444 3195 550 45431

Mehmet C. Oz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mehmet C. Oz between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mehmet C. Oz published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 14.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2003. 5 of the 561 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2003. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 15 publications 1990: 21 publications 1991: 18 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 36 publications 1996: 23 publications 1997: 36 publications 1998: 34 publications 1999: 43 publications 2000: 34 publications 2001: 39 publications 2002: 31 publications 2003: 45 publications 2004: 40 publications 2005: 27 publications 2006: 33 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1987 2025

561 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mehmet C. Oz: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 15
1990 21
1991 18
1992 13
1993 7
1994 13
1995 36
1996 23
1997 36
1998 34
1999 43
2000 34
2001 39
2002 31
2003 45
2004 40
2005 27
2006 33
2007 14
2008 9
2009 9
2010 8
2011 1
2012 0
2013 2
2014 0
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
2023 1
2024 3
2025 2
Total 561
Download as CSV

Mehmet C. Oz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mehmet C. Oz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 550 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 550
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mehmet C. Oz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mehmet C. Oz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 106
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mehmet C. Öz is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and has contributed to multiple fields, particularly within the arts and humanities. Their work spans literature, museology, social psychology, and linguistics, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to cultural and social studies.

The primary fields of study for Mehmet C. Öz include:

  • Arts and Humanities

Within these broader areas, their subfields of focus are:

  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Museology
  • Social Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics

The main research topics Mehmet C. Öz has explored encompass:

  • Turkish Literature and Culture
  • Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies
  • Families in Therapy and Culture
  • Linguistics and Cultural Studies

Mehmet C. Öz has published several papers in diverse academic venues, including:

  • "Hilmi Yavuz Şiirinde Geleneğin Bir Unsuru Olarak Türküler," 2020, in HUMANITAS - Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
  • "Discussion," 2022, in JTCVS Open
  • "Comparison of risk scoring systems in patients with first diagnosis of myocardial infarction: A retrospective analysis," 2023, in Atherosclerosis
  • "BÜYÜK ANLATILARDAN KÜÇÜK ANLATILARA KAHRAMANIN DÖNÜŞÜMÜ," 2024, in Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

The frequent publication venues associated with their work are:

  • HUMANITAS - Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
  • JTCVS Open
  • Atherosclerosis
  • Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Collaboration is a component of Mehmet C. Öz's research activity, with several frequent co-authors including:

  • Barış Güngör
  • Barış Şimşek
  • Ahmet Çağdaş Yumurtaş
  • G Bayraktar
  • Elif Gökçen Vatanoğlu

Best Publications

  • Long-Term Use of a Left Ventricular Assist Device for End-Stage Heart Failure

    E A Rose;A C Gelijns;A J Moskowitz;D F Heitjan

  • Expression of VEGFR-2 and AC133 by circulating human CD34+ cells identifies a population of functional endothelial precursors

    Mario Peichev;Afzal J. Naiyer;Daniel Pereira;Zhenping Zhu

  • Evidence-Based Guidelines for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Women

    Lori Mosca;Lawrence J. Appel;Emelia J. Benjamin;Kathy Berra

  • Vasopressin Deficiency Contributes to the Vasodilation of Septic Shock

    Donald W. Landry;Howard R. Levin;Ellen M. Gallant;Robert C. Ashton

  • Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate vented electric left ventricular assist system in patients awaiting heart transplantation.

    O.H. Frazier;Eric A. Rose;Mehmet C. Oz;Walter Dembitsky

  • Reversal of chronic ventricular dilation in patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy by prolonged mechanical unloading.

    Howard R. Levin;Mehmet C. Oz;Jonathan M. Chen;Milton Packer

  • Method and apparatus for circulatory valve repair

    Mehmet C. Oz;Gerald M. Lemole;Alan Lotvin;Juan P. Umana

  • Implantable left ventricular assist devices

    Daniel J. Goldstein;Mehmet C. Oz;Eric A. Rose

  • Surgical ventricular restoration in the treatment of congestive heart failure due to post-infarction ventricular dilation.

    Constantine L. Athanasuleas;Gerald D. Buckberg;Alfred W.H. Stanley;William Siler

  • Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Patients With Chronic Congestive Heart Failure

    Nicholas C. Dang;Veli K. Topkara;Michelle Mercando;Joy Kay

  • Low Incidence of Myocardial Recovery After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.

    D M Mancini;A Beniaminovitz;H Levin;K Catanese

  • Use of Rapamycin Slows Progression of Cardiac Transplantation Vasculopathy

    Donna Mancini;Sean Pinney;Daniel Burkhoff;John LaManca

  • Vasopressin pressor hypersensitivity in vasodilatory septic shock.

    Donald W. Landry;Howard R. Levin;Ellen M. Gallant;Susan Seo

  • Management of vasodilatory shock after cardiac surgery: Identification of predisposing factors and use of a novel pressor agent

    Michael Argenziano;Jonathan M. Chen;Asim F. Choudhri;Suzanne Cullinane

  • Right ventricular dysfunction and organ failure in left ventricular assist device recipients: a continuing problem.

    Minoo N Kavarana;Melissa S Pessin-Minsley;Jacqueline Urtecho;Katharine A Catanese

  • Hypoxia-induced exocytosis of endothelial cell Weibel-Palade bodies. A mechanism for rapid neutrophil recruitment after cardiac preservation.

    David J. Pinsky;Yoshifumi Naka;Hui Liao;Mehmet C. Oz

  • Chronic Unloading by Left Ventricular Assist Device Reverses Contractile Dysfunction and Alters Gene Expression in End-Stage Heart Failure

    Paul M. Heerdt;Jeffrey W. Holmes;Bolin Cai;Alessandro Barbone

  • Controlled clinical trial of a novel hemostatic agent in cardiac surgery

    Mehmet C Oz;Delos M Cosgrove;Brian R Badduke;J.Donald Hill

  • Multicenter review of preoperative risk factors for stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting

    Ranjit John;Asim F. Choudhri;Alan D. Weinberg;Windsor Ting

  • Comparison of Right and Left Ventricular Responses to Left Ventricular Assist Device Support in Patients With Severe Heart Failure A Primary Role of Mechanical Unloading Underlying Reverse Remodeling

    Alessandro Barbone;Jeff W. Holmes;Paul M. Heerdt

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric A. Rose
Eric A. Rose Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Yoshifumi Naka
Yoshifumi Naka Columbia University
Donna Mancini
Donna Mancini Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Mathew R. Williams
Mathew R. Williams New York University
Howard R. Levin
Howard R. Levin Columbia University
Robert E. Michler
Robert E. Michler Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Daniel Burkhoff
Daniel Burkhoff Columbia University
Ranjit John
Ranjit John University of Minnesota
David J. Pinsky
David J. Pinsky University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David M. Stern
David M. Stern University of Tennessee Health Science Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine isn’t limited to attending medical school; there are several alternative online degrees and pathways to consider. Many students start their journey with a BSN degree, often opting for one of the cheapest rn to bsn online programs to balance quality education with affordability.

Those without a nursing background can also pursue nursing careers by enrolling in direct entry np programs for non nurses online. These programs open doors to advanced nursing roles, even for career-changers.

If you are seeking accessible options, several online bsn programs for non nurses provide flexible and less competitive admission pathways. This is an excellent route for those eager to enter healthcare without previous nursing experience.

For students interested in administrative roles, there are top medical billing and coding schools with financial aid. These programs let you support healthcare delivery from behind the scenes, often with the help of financial assistance.

Best Scientists Citing Mehmet C. Oz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles