World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 34 1939 1778 107 98 94 2652

Dana L.M. Campbell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dana L.M. Campbell between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dana L.M. Campbell published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2021. 15 of the 118 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2021. 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 7 publications
2009 2025

118 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dana L.M. Campbell: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 5
2010 3
2011 0
2012 1
2013 3
2014 1
2015 0
2016 10
2017 10
2018 8
2019 9
2020 12
2021 16
2022 14
2023 11
2024 8
2025 7
Total 118
Download as CSV

Dana L.M. Campbell publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dana L.M. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 94–98 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 94 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103 94
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

Dana L.M. Campbell D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dana L.M. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126 34
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Dana L.M. Campbell is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Veterinary science.

Their work focuses on several subfields, including Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Ecology. The main research topics they explore include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies, Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock, Human-Animal Interaction Studies, Livestock and Poultry Management, Animal Behavior and Reproduction, and aspects related to Rabbits such as Nutrition, Reproduction, and Health.

Dana L.M. Campbell has published widely across several academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Animals
  • Frontiers in Veterinary Science
  • Frontiers in Animal Science
  • Applied Animal Behaviour Science
  • Animal Production Science

Recent research papers authored or co-authored by Campbell include:

  • "Virtual Fencing Technology Excludes Beef Cattle from an Environmentally Sensitive Area" (2020), Animals
  • "Virtual Fence Responses Are Socially Facilitated in Beef Cattle" (2020), Frontiers in Veterinary Science
  • "Free-range egg production: its implications for hen welfare" (2020), Animal Production Science
  • "A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Assess the Welfare Impacts of a New Virtual Fencing Technology" (2021), Frontiers in Veterinary Science
  • "Effects of outdoor ranging on external and internal health parameters for hens from different rearing enrichments" (2020), PeerJ

Their collaborative work involves frequent partnerships with several researchers, including:

  • Caroline Lee
  • Jim M. Lea
  • Md Saiful Bari
  • Andrew M. Cohen-Barnhouse
  • Jessica E. Monk

Best Publications

  • A review of environmental enrichment for laying hens during rearing in relation to their behavioral and physiological development

    D.L.M. Campbell;D.L.M. Campbell;E.N. de Haas;Caroline Lee;Caroline Lee

  • Virtual Fencing Is Comparable to Electric Tape Fencing for Cattle Behavior and Welfare.

    Dana L M Campbell;Jim M Lea;Hamideh Keshavarzi;Caroline Lee

  • Fear and coping styles of outdoor-preferring, moderate-outdoor and indoor-preferring free-range laying hens

    Dana L.M. Campbell;Dana L.M. Campbell;Geoff N. Hinch;Jeff A. Downing;Caroline Lee

  • A Framework to Assess the Impact of New Animal Management Technologies on Welfare: A Case Study of Virtual Fencing.

    Caroline Lee;Caroline Lee;Ian G. Colditz;Dana L. M. Campbell;Dana L. M. Campbell

  • Tech-Savvy Beef Cattle? How Heifers Respond to Moving Virtual Fence Lines.

    Dana L. M. Campbell;Jim M. Lea;William J. Farrer;Sally J. Haynes

  • Impact of on-range choice feeding with black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens) on flock performance, egg quality, and range use of free-range laying hens.

    Isabelle Ruhnke;Camille Normant;Dana L.M. Campbell;Dana L.M. Campbell;Zafar Iqbal

  • Application of open field, tonic immobility, and attention bias tests to hens with different ranging patterns.

    Dana L.M. Campbell;Emily J. Dickson;Emily J. Dickson;Caroline Lee

  • Temporary Exclusion of Cattle from a Riparian Zone Using Virtual Fencing Technology.

    Dana L. M. Campbell;Dana L. M. Campbell;Sally J. Haynes;Jim M. Lea;William J. Farrer

  • Virtual fencing of cattle using an automated collar in a feed attractant trial

    Dana L.M. Campbell;Dana L.M. Campbell;Jim M. Lea;Sally J. Haynes;William J. Farrer

  • Litter use by laying hens in a commercial aviary: dust bathing and piling

    D. L. M. Campbell;M. M. Makagon;J. C. Swanson;J. M. Siegford

  • Outdoor stocking density in free-range laying hens: Radio-frequency identification of impacts on range use

    D. L. M. Campbell;G. N. Hinch;T. R. Dyall;L. Warin

  • Virtual Fencing Technology Excludes Beef Cattle from an Environmentally Sensitive Area.

    Dana L. M. Campbell;Jackie Ouzman;Damian Mowat;Jim M. Lea

  • Boredom-like states in mink and their behavioural correlates: A replicate study

    Rebecca K. Meagher;Dana L.M. Campbell;Dana L.M. Campbell;Georgia J. Mason

  • Influence of genetic strain and access to litter on spatial distribution of 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system.

    A. B. A. Ali;D. L. M. Campbell;D. M. Karcher;J. M. Siegford

  • Sleeping tight or hiding in fright? The welfare implications of different subtypes of inactivity in mink

    Rebecca K. Meagher;Dana L.M. Campbell;Jamie Ahloy Dallaire;María Díez-León

  • Outdoor stocking density in free-range laying hens: effects on behaviour and welfare.

    D.L.M. Campbell;G.N. Hinch;J.A. Downing;C. Lee

  • Early enrichment in free-range laying hens: effects on ranging behaviour, welfare and response to stressors.

    Dana Campbell;Geoff Hinch;Jeff Downing;Caroline Lee

  • Free-range egg production: its implications for hen welfare

    D. L. M. Campbell;M. S. Bari;M. S. Bari;J.-L. Rault

  • Laying hen movement in a commercial aviary: Enclosure to floor and back again.

    D. L. M. Campbell;M. M. Makagon;J. C. Swanson;J. M. Siegford

  • Virtual Fence Responses Are Socially Facilitated in Beef Cattle.

    Hamideh Keshavarzi;Caroline Lee;Jim M. Lea;Dana L. M. Campbell

  • Perch use by laying hens in a commercial aviary

    D. L. M. Campbell;M. M. Makagon;J. C. Swanson;J. M. Siegford

  • Context and Control: Behavioural Ecology Experiments in the Laboratory

    Dana L.M. Campbell;Susan A. Weiner;Philip T. Starks;Mark Erno Hauber;Mark Erno Hauber

  • Cross-fostering diminishes song discrimination in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).

    Dana L.M. Campbell;Mark Erno Hauber;Mark Erno Hauber

Frequent Co-Authors

Caroline Lee
Caroline Lee Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Janice M. Siegford
Janice M. Siegford Michigan State University
Georgia Mason
Georgia Mason University of Guelph
Mark E. Hauber
Mark E. Hauber Queens College, CUNY
Geoffrey Hinch
Geoffrey Hinch University of New England
Rupert Palme
Rupert Palme University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Wei Ni
Wei Ni Edith Cowan University
Mark Johnson
Mark Johnson Macquarie University
S. W. Walkden-Brown
S. W. Walkden-Brown University of New England
Irene Camerlink
Irene Camerlink Polish Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Animal Science and Veterinary fields often leads students to explore complementary disciplines that enhance their skillsets and career options. For those interested in health and wellness, an online exercise science degree offers a pathway to specialized knowledge in physical health, applicable to veterinary rehabilitation or animal fitness roles.

In behavioral sciences, working with animals or developing training programs may align well with certifications from bacb accredited schools, which prepare candidates for Board Certified Behavior Analyst credentials. This expertise can bridge animal behavior and human-animal interaction studies.

Further, understanding psychological principles is valuable in many aspects of veterinary care and animal welfare. Prospective students can consider online school psychology programs nasp approved to expand skills in behavioral health, which may intersect with animal-assisted therapy and educational outreach.

For those interested in advanced psychology roles that support therapeutic interventions, online psyd programs accredited offer convenient options without GRE requirements, allowing for flexibility while pursuing doctoral-level education that can complement veterinary or animal science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Dana L.M. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles