World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 43 966 893 58 54 133 5160

Caroline Lee publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Caroline Lee between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Caroline Lee published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2025. 23 of the 194 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2025. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 21 publications 2026: 2 publications
2005 2026

194 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Caroline Lee: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 1
2007 5
2008 7
2009 5
2010 4
2011 6
2012 6
2013 2
2014 7
2015 6
2016 9
2017 10
2018 14
2019 10
2020 16
2021 11
2022 15
2023 17
2024 18
2025 21
2026 2
Total 194
Download as CSV

Caroline Lee publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline Lee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 129–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 133 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89 133
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

Caroline Lee D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline Lee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62 43
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Caroline Lee is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on agricultural and biological sciences, with significant contributions in veterinary science. The scientist's work spans several subfields, including small animals, animal science and zoology, genetics, ecology, and reproductive medicine.

The research topics prominently addressed by Lee include animal behavior and welfare studies, human-animal interaction studies, effects of environmental stressors on livestock, animal nutrition and physiology, meat and animal product quality, endometriosis research and treatment, and agriculture and farm safety.

Lee has contributed to numerous publications, with notable papers including:

  • "Virtual Fencing Technology Excludes Beef Cattle from an Environmentally Sensitive Area" (2020, Animals)
  • "Virtual Fence Responses Are Socially Facilitated in Beef Cattle" (2020, Frontiers in Veterinary Science)
  • "The Influence of Temperament on Body Temperature Response to Handling in Angus Cattle" (2020, Animals)
  • "A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Assess the Welfare Impacts of a New Virtual Fencing Technology" (2021, Frontiers in Veterinary Science)
  • "The application of virtual fencing technology effectively herds cattle and sheep" (2021, Animal Production Science)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Lee include Dana L. M. Campbell, Jessica E. Monk, Jim M. Lea, Ian G. Colditz, and Danila Marini.

Lee's research is disseminated across a number of journals with repeated contributions in:

  • Animals
  • Animal Production Science
  • Frontiers in Veterinary Science
  • Applied Animal Behaviour Science
  • PeerJ

Best Publications

  • Release from restraint generates a positive judgement bias in sheep

    Rebecca Elise Doyle;Rebecca Elise Doyle;Andrew D Fisher;Geoffrey Hinch;Alain Boissy

  • The design and evaluation of a mobile sensor/actuator network for autonomous animal control

    Tim Wark;Chris Crossman;Wen Hu;Ying Guo

  • A review of environmental enrichment for laying hens during rearing in relation to their behavioral and physiological development

    D.L.M. Campbell;D.L.M. Campbell;E.N. de Haas;Caroline Lee;Caroline Lee

  • Measuring judgement bias and emotional reactivity in sheep following long-term exposure to unpredictable and aversive events

    Rebecca Elise Doyle;Caroline Lee;Veronique Deiss;Andrew D Fisher

  • The effect of repeated testing on judgement biases in sheep.

    Rebecca Elise Doyle;Stephanie Vidal;Geoffrey Hinch;Andrew D Fisher

  • The influence of land transport on animal welfare in extensive farming systems

    Andrew D. Fisher;Ian G. Colditz;Caroline Lee;Drewe M. Ferguson

  • Sheep exhibit a positive judgement bias and stress-induced hyperthermia following shearing

    Maree E Sanger;Maree E Sanger;Rebecca E Doyle;Rebecca E Doyle;Geoffrey Hinch;Caroline Lee

  • The effect of a topical anaesthetic formulation, systemic flunixin and carprofen, singly or in combination, on cortisol and behavioural responses of Merino lambs to mulesing.

    Paull;C Lee;IG Colditz;SJ Atkinson

  • The effects of 12, 30, or 48 hours of road transport on the physiological and behavioral responses of sheep.

    A. D. Fisher;D. O. Niemeyer;J. M. Lea;C. Lee

  • Associative learning by cattle to enable effective and ethical virtual fences

    Caroline Lee;John M. Henshall;Tim J. Wark;Chris C. Crossman

  • Attention bias to threat indicates anxiety differences in sheep

    Caroline Lee;Else Verbeek;Rebecca Doyle;Melissa Bateson

  • Virtual Fencing Is Comparable to Electric Tape Fencing for Cattle Behavior and Welfare.

    Dana L M Campbell;Jim M Lea;Hamideh Keshavarzi;Caroline Lee

  • How assessing relationships between emotions and cognition can improve farm animal welfare.

    A Boissy;C Lee

  • Chronic stress induces pessimistic-like judgment and learning deficits in sheep

    Alexandra Destrez;Véronique Deiss;Frédéric Lévy;Ludovic Calandreau

  • Performance and endocrine responses of group housed weaner pigs exposed to the air quality of a commercial environment

    C. Lee;C. Lee;L.R. Giles;W.L. Bryden;W.L. Bryden;J.L. Downing

  • Fear and coping styles of outdoor-preferring, moderate-outdoor and indoor-preferring free-range laying hens

    Dana L.M. Campbell;Dana L.M. Campbell;Geoff N. Hinch;Jeff A. Downing;Caroline Lee

  • Anxiety influences attention bias but not flight speed and crush score in beef cattle

    Caroline Lee;Caroline Lee;Linda M. Cafe;Samantha L. Robinson;Samantha L. Robinson;Rebecca E. Doyle

  • A Framework to Assess the Impact of New Animal Management Technologies on Welfare: A Case Study of Virtual Fencing.

    Caroline Lee;Caroline Lee;Ian G. Colditz;Dana L. M. Campbell;Dana L. M. Campbell

  • Development of a maze test and its application to assess spatial learning and memory in Merino sheep

    Caroline Lee;Steve Colegate;Andrew D. Fisher

  • Tech-Savvy Beef Cattle? How Heifers Respond to Moving Virtual Fence Lines.

    Dana L. M. Campbell;Jim M. Lea;William J. Farrer;Sally J. Haynes

  • Impact of on-range choice feeding with black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens) on flock performance, egg quality, and range use of free-range laying hens.

    Isabelle Ruhnke;Camille Normant;Dana L.M. Campbell;Dana L.M. Campbell;Zafar Iqbal

  • Does reduction of fearfulness tend to reduce pessimistic-like judgment in lambs?

    Alexandra Destrez;Véronique Deiss;Catherine Belzung;Caroline Lee

  • Methods of training cattle to avoid a location using electrical cues

    Caroline Lee;Kishore Prayaga;Matt Reed;John Henshall

  • Virtual fencing of cattle using an automated collar in a feed attractant trial

    Dana L.M. Campbell;Dana L.M. Campbell;Jim M. Lea;Sally J. Haynes;William J. Farrer

  • Are hungry sheep more pessimistic? The effects of food restriction on cognitive bias and the involvement of ghrelin in its regulation.

    Else Verbeek;Drewe Ferguson;Caroline Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Dana L.M. Campbell
Dana L.M. Campbell Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Andrew D. Fisher
Andrew D. Fisher University of Melbourne
Geoffrey Hinch
Geoffrey Hinch University of New England
Drewe Ferguson
Drewe Ferguson Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Alain Boissy
Alain Boissy INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
L. M. Cafe
L. M. Cafe University of New England
Wayne L. Bryden
Wayne L. Bryden University of Queensland
Peter Corke
Peter Corke Queensland University of Technology
Wei Ni
Wei Ni Edith Cowan University
Mark Johnson
Mark Johnson Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Animal Science or Veterinary studies opens diverse professional doors, from hands-on animal care to research and policy roles. Many students also explore complementary fields that support animal welfare and community health.

For those interested in behavioral health alongside animal care, degrees like the best online substance abuse counseling degree offer specialized training for supporting individuals and families facing addiction challenges.

Similarly, a marriage and family counseling degree online can complement animal science careers by developing skills in human relationships and communication, enhancing community outreach and advocacy efforts.

For professionals seeking advanced credentials, earning a doctorate in counseling online provides flexible pathways to leadership roles in mental health, animal-assisted therapy, and educational settings.

Exploring the high paying jobs with animal science degree reveals a landscape of lucrative opportunities, underscoring the value of combining scientific expertise with specialized training in related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Caroline Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles