World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 44 6764 6496 2416 2244 144 7232

Kim A. Anderson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kim A. Anderson between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kim A. Anderson published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2023. 23 of the 201 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2023. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 12 publications
1989 2025

201 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kim A. Anderson: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 1
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 2
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 2
2000 3
2001 2
2002 3
2003 1
2004 2
2005 4
2006 5
2007 1
2008 4
2009 4
2010 4
2011 4
2012 6
2013 4
2014 11
2015 5
2016 15
2017 11
2018 9
2019 13
2020 7
2021 11
2022 16
2023 18
2024 11
2025 12
Total 201
Download as CSV

Kim A. Anderson publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim A. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 144 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541 144
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Kim A. Anderson D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim A. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330 44
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Kim A. Anderson is affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with an extensive publication record in subfields such as health, toxicology and mutagenesis, plant science, cancer research, sociology and political science, and occupational therapy.

The main topics covered in Kim A. Anderson's work include toxic organic pollutants impact, effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals, air quality and health impacts, carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment, pesticide exposure and toxicity, heavy metal exposure and toxicity, and environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology.

Frequent co-authors in Anderson's research collaborations include:

  • Richard P. Scott
  • Diana Rohlman
  • Lane G. Tidwell
  • Katrina M. Waters
  • Lisa Bramer

Anderson has published multiple papers in key environmental and public health journals. Frequent venues of publication are:

  • Environment International
  • Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Toxics

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by Anderson include:

  • "Silicone wristbands as personal passive sampling devices: Current knowledge, recommendations for use, and future directions" (2022) in Environment International
  • "Wildfire Impact on Indoor and Outdoor PAH Air Quality" (2022) in Environmental Science & Technology
  • "Discovery of firefighter chemical exposures using military-style silicone dog tags" (2020) in Environment International
  • "Nicotine, Cotinine, and Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines Measured in Children's Silicone Wristbands in Relation to Secondhand Smoke and E-cigarette Vapor Exposure" (2020) in Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • "Assessment of Multipollutant Exposures During Pregnancy Using Silicone Wristbands" (2020) in Frontiers in Public Health

Best Publications

  • Impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Gulf of Mexico coastal waters

    Sarah E. Allan;Brian W. Smith;Kim A. Anderson

  • Silicone Wristbands as Personal Passive Samplers

    Steven G O'Connell;Laurel D Kincl;Kim A Anderson

  • Neurodevelopmental low-dose bisphenol A exposure leads to early life-stage hyperactivity and learning deficits in adult zebrafish.

    Katerine S. Saili;Margaret M. Corvi;Daniel N. Weber;Ami U. Patel

  • Comparative developmental toxicity of environmentally relevant oxygenated PAHs

    Andrea L. Knecht;Britton C. Goodale;Lisa Truong;Michael T. Simonich

  • Measuring Personal Exposure to Organophosphate Flame Retardants Using Silicone Wristbands and Hand Wipes

    Stephanie C. Hammel;Kate Hoffman;Thomas F. Webster;Kim A. Anderson

  • Comparative developmental toxicity of a comprehensive suite of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

    Mitra C. Geier;Anna C. Chlebowski;Lisa Truong;Staci L. Massey Simonich

  • Developmental Exposure to Polychlorinated Biphenyls Interferes with Experience-Dependent Dendritic Plasticity and Ryanodine Receptor Expression in Weanling Rats

    Dongren Yang;Kyung Ho Kim;Andrew Phimister;Adam D. Bachstetter

  • Determining the geographic origin of potatoes with trace metal analysis using statistical and neural network classifiers.

    Unknown

  • Completing the Link between Exposure Science and Toxicology for Improved Environmental Health Decision Making: The Aggregate Exposure Pathway Framework

    Justin G Teeguarden;Yu-Mei Tan;Stephen W Edwards;Jeremy A Leonard

  • Stainless steel leaches nickel and chromium into foods during cooking.

    Kristin L. Kamerud;Kevin A. Hobbie;Kim A. Anderson

  • Ketone and quinone-substituted polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mussel tissue, sediment, urban dust, and diesel particulate matrices

    Julie A. Layshock;Glenn Wilson;Kim A. Anderson

  • Preparation and performance features of wristband samplers and considerations for chemical exposure assessment.

    Kim A Anderson;Gary L Points;Carey E Donald;Holly M Dixon

  • Using silicone wristbands to evaluate preschool children's exposure to flame retardants

    Molly L. Kile;Richard P. Scott;Steven G. O’Connell;Shannon Lipscomb

  • Silicone wristbands detect individuals' pesticide exposures in West Africa

    Carey E. Donald;Richard P. Scott;Kathy L. Blaustein;Mary L. Halbleib

  • Use of chemical profiling to differentiate geographic growing origin of raw pistachios

    Kim A Anderson;Brian W Smith

  • Cross-sectional study of social behaviors in preschool children and exposure to flame retardants.

    Shannon T. Lipscomb;Megan M. McClelland;Megan MacDonald;Andres Cardenas

  • Trace element concentration in tree-rings biomonitoring centuries of environmental change.

    Kimberly L. Padilla;Kim A. Anderson

  • Silicone wristbands compared with traditional polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure assessment methods

    Holly M. Dixon;Richard P. Scott;Darrell Holmes;Lehyla Calero

  • Structurally distinct polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons induce differential transcriptional responses in developing zebrafish.

    Britton C. Goodale;Susan C. Tilton;Margaret M. Corvi;Glenn R. Wilson

  • Assessing the Exposome with External Measures: Commentary on the State of the Science and Research Recommendations

    Michelle C. Turner;Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen;Kim Anderson;David Balshaw

  • DGT estimates cadmium accumulation in wheat and potato from phosphate fertilizer applications

    Angela L. Pérez;Kim A. Anderson

  • Multi-class chemical exposure in rural Peru using silicone wristbands.

    Alan J Bergmann;Paula E North;Luis Vasquez;Hernan Bello;Hernan Bello

  • Systematic developmental neurotoxicity assessment of a representative PAH Superfund mixture using zebrafish

    Mitra C. Geier;D. James Minick;Lisa Truong;Susan Tilton

  • Field trial and modeling of uptake rates of in situ lipid-free polyethylene membrane passive sampler.

    K. A. Anderson;D. Sethajintanin;G. Sower;L. Quarles

  • Emissions of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Natural Gas Extraction into Air.

    L. Blair Paulik;Carey E. Donald;Brian W. Smith;Lane G. Tidwell

Frequent Co-Authors

Katrina M. Waters
Katrina M. Waters Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Robert L. Tanguay
Robert L. Tanguay Oregon State University
David E. Williams
David E. Williams Oregon State University
Megan M. McClelland
Megan M. McClelland Oregon State University
Thomas A. Arcury
Thomas A. Arcury Wake Forest University
Pamela J. Lein
Pamela J. Lein University of California, Davis
Staci L. Massey Simonich
Staci L. Massey Simonich Oregon State University
Justin G. Teeguarden
Justin G. Teeguarden Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Heather M. Stapleton
Heather M. Stapleton Duke University
Paul J. Laurienti
Paul J. Laurienti Wake Forest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities that often intersect with other fields such as public administration, sociology, and education. For those interested in advancing their leadership abilities, exploring 1 year mpa programs can provide a fast-track path to managing environmental policies and sustainability initiatives.

Understanding social behavior and community dynamics is also crucial in environmental work. Pursuing a best online sociology bachelor degree complements environmental science by enhancing skills in analyzing human-environment interactions and promoting social equity.

For educators focused on environmental topics, advancing through education doctoral programs without dissertation can be a convenient way to gain expertise and credentials without the traditional dissertation process. Additionally, exploring eds to edd programs offers a streamlined progression for those committed to leadership roles in academic and environmental education settings.

By integrating knowledge across these complementary disciplines, students and professionals can build well-rounded careers that address complex environmental challenges from various angles.

Best Scientists Citing Kim A. Anderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles