World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 30 1181 1068 597 519 136 4025

Yanna Krupnikov publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Yanna Krupnikov between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Yanna Krupnikov published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2018. 5 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2018. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 56 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1970 2025

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Yanna Krupnikov: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 2
2007 2
2008 2
2009 4
2010 2
2011 1
2012 4
2013 1
2014 7
2015 3
2016 20
2017 8
2018 56
2019 15
2020 27
2021 10
2022 14
2023 4
2024 3
2025 2
Total 188
Download as CSV

Yanna Krupnikov publications per year - data summary

  • Yanna Krupnikov, a Political Science scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, has 188 publications recorded across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1970 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2018, with 56 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1970, 2011 and 2013, with 1 publication each.
  • 35 of the 56 years in the span carry no publications at all (1971, 1972, 1973, 1974 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.0 per year counting only the 21 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 33 publications, 18% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1970-1988: 1 publication (0.1 per year); 1989-2007: 4 publications (0.2 per year); 2008-2025: 183 publications (10.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Yanna Krupnikov publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yanna Krupnikov sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 136–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 136 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45 136
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Yanna Krupnikov publication distribution in Political Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 2,033 Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 36–40 to 333+ publications.
  • Yanna Krupnikov, a Political Science scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, records 136 publications - the 58th percentile of the discipline.
  • 58% of ranked Political Science scientists score the same or lower than Yanna Krupnikov, and about 42% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 121–125 publications range, and Yanna Krupnikov ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 333+ publications, holding 97 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 44% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 111–115 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 333 publications or more, 97 scientists in all (5% of the field).

Yanna Krupnikov D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yanna Krupnikov sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96 30
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Yanna Krupnikov D-index placement in Political Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 2,033 Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 43 ranges running from 20 to 62+ D-Index.
  • Yanna Krupnikov, a Political Science scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, records 30 D-Index - the 45th percentile of the discipline.
  • 45% of ranked Political Science scientists score the same or lower than Yanna Krupnikov, and about 55% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 32 D-Index range, and Yanna Krupnikov ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62+ D-Index, holding 100 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 45% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 30 D-Index), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (5% of the field).

Overview

Yanna Krupnikov is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broad domain of Social Sciences, with a focus on subfields including Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, and Management Science and Operations Research.

The main topics that characterize their academic work cover Social Media and Politics, Electoral Systems and Political Participation, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Media Studies and Communication, Evaluation and Performance Assessment, Populism and Right-Wing Movements, and Gender Politics and Representation.

Yanna Krupnikov has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed publications and books. Their frequent publication venues include Harvard Dataverse, American Political Science Review, Public Opinion Quarterly, Nature Human Behaviour, and The Journal of Politics.

The scientist has a record of published papers such as:

  • "Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America" (2020, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • "How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms" (2021, Public Opinion Quarterly)
  • "(Mis)estimating Affective Polarization" (2021, The Journal of Politics)
  • "How Affective Polarization Shapes Americans' Political Beliefs: A Study of Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2020, Journal of Experimental Political Science)
  • "Using social media to promote academic research: Identifying the benefits of twitter for sharing academic work" (2020, PLoS ONE)

In terms of authored books, all published by Cambridge University Press, notable titles include:

  • "The Other Divide" (2022)
  • "The Increasing Viability of Good News" (2021)
  • "Constructing Political Expertise in the News" (2023)

Yanna Krupnikov collaborates regularly with several coauthors. Frequent collaborators include John Barry Ryan, Eric Groenendyk, Samara Klar, James Druckman, and Matthew Levendusky.

Best Publications

  • Cross-Sample Comparisons and External Validity

    Yanna Krupnikov;Adam Seth Levine

  • Independent Politics

    Unknown

  • Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America.

    James N. Druckman;Samara Klar;Yanna Krupnikov;Matthew Levendusky

  • When Does Negativity Demobilize? Tracing the Conditional Effect of Negative Campaigning on Voter Turnout

    Yanna Krupnikov

  • How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms

    Jon Kingzette;James N Druckman;Samara Klar;Yanna Krupnikov

  • Affective Polarization or Partisan Disdain?Untangling a Dislike for the Opposing Party from a Dislike of Partisanship

    Samara Klar;Yanna Krupnikov;John Barry Ryan

  • The Relationship Between Campaign Negativity, Gender and Campaign Context

    Yanna Krupnikov;Nichole M. Bauer

  • Using social media to promote academic research: Identifying the benefits of twitter for sharing academic work.

    Samara Klar;Yanna Krupnikov;John Barry Ryan;Kathleen Searles

  • Independent Politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction

    Samara M Klar;Yanna Krupnikov

  • (Mis-)Estimating Affective Polarization

    James N. Druckman;Samara Klar;Yanna Krupnikov;Matthew Levendusky

  • The Other Divide

    Unknown

  • Saving Face: Identifying Voter Responses to Black Candidates and Female Candidates

    Yanna Krupnikov;Spencer Piston;Nichole M. Bauer

  • Measuring Gubernatorial Budgetary Power A New Approach

    Yanna Krupnikov;Charles Shipan

  • Convenience Samples in Political Science Experiments

    Yanna Krupnikov;H. Hannah Nam;Hillary Style

  • Who is Punished? Conditions Affecting Voter Evaluations of Legislators Who Do Not Compromise

    Nichole M. Bauer;Laurel Harbridge Yong;Yanna Krupnikov

  • Racial Prejudice, Partisanship, and White Turnout in Elections with Black Candidates

    Yanna Krupnikov;Spencer Piston

  • The effects of ambiguous rhetoric in congressional elections

    Kerri Milita;Elizabeth N. Simas;John Barry Ryan;Yanna Krupnikov

  • Women Also Know Stuff: Meta-Level Mentoring to Battle Gender Bias in Political Science

    Emily Beaulieu;Amber E. Boydstun;Nadia E. Brown;Kim Yi Dionne

  • Social Media and the Changing Information Environment

    Patrick W Kraft;Yanna Krupnikov;Kerri Milita;John Barry Ryan

  • What Motivates Reasoning? A Theory of Goal‐Dependent Political Evaluation

    Eric W. Groenendyk;Yanna Krupnikov

  • Voter Uncertainty, Political Institutions, and Legislative Turnover

    Yanna Krupnikov;Charles R. Shipan

  • Accentuating the Negative: Candidate Race and Campaign Strategy

    Yanna Krupnikov;Spencer Piston

  • The Political Consequences of Latino Prejudice against Blacks

    Yanna Krupnikov;Spencer Piston

  • Clear as Black and White: The Effects of Ambiguous Rhetoric Depend on Candidate Race

    Spencer Piston;Yanna Krupnikov;John Barry Ryan;Kerri Milita

  • How Negativity Can Increase and Decrease Voter Turnout: The Effect of Timing

    Yanna Krupnikov

  • Negative Advertising and Voter Choice: The Role of Ads in Candidate Selection

    Yanna Krupnikov

  • Why State Constitutions Differ in their Treatment of Same-Sex Marriage

    Arthur Lupia;Yanna Krupnikov;Adam Seth Levine;Spencer Piston

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur Lupia
Arthur Lupia University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James N. Druckman
James N. Druckman University of Rochester
Matthew S. Levendusky
Matthew S. Levendusky University of Pennsylvania
Stuart Soroka
Stuart Soroka University of California, Los Angeles
Markus Prior
Markus Prior Princeton University
Charles R. Shipan
Charles R. Shipan University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens the door to a variety of related academic paths and flexible, high-impact careers. Many students pursue double majors or minors, such as history majors in college, to gain deeper context about political systems and cultures.

For those seeking versatility, enrolling in an interdisciplinary studies degree online can help blend political science with fields like communication, economics, or law. These programs are accessible and designed to fit different schedules and career goals.

Ambitious learners looking to specialize further can consider online master's in history programs. These graduate degrees can provide advanced research skills that are valuable in roles like policy analysis, education, or government.

Additionally, those seeking quick entry into the workforce or a career boost can explore 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These certification programs cover skills such as project management, data analytics, or digital marketing—each complementing a background in political science.

Best Scientists Citing Yanna Krupnikov

Trending Scientists