World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
40
Citations
6832
World Ranking
505
National Ranking
280

Magdalena Wojcieszak publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Magdalena Wojcieszak sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 132 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Magdalena Wojcieszak D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Magdalena Wojcieszak sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Magdalena Wojcieszak is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily spans the Social Sciences, with a focus on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Artificial Intelligence, Political Science and International Relations, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics.

The main topics of their work include Social Media and Politics, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection, Media Influence and Politics, Electoral Systems and Political Participation, Media Studies and Communication, and Social and Intergroup Psychology.

Recent notable publications by Magdalena Wojcieszak include:

  • Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on Facebook (2023, Science)
  • How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign? (2023, Science)
  • Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing (2023, Nature)
  • Can Interparty Contact Reduce Affective Polarization? A Systematic Test of Different Forms of Intergroup Contact (2020, Political Communication)
  • Reshares on social media amplify political news but do not detectably affect beliefs or opinions (2023, Science)

Frequent coauthors in their research collaborations include Ericka Menchen-Trevino, Andrew M. Guess, Joshua A. Tucker, Sandra González-Bailón, and Hunt Allcott.

Magdalena Wojcieszak has published extensively in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Harvard Dataverse, The International Journal of Press/Politics, Political Behavior, and Science. The volume of publications in these venues reflects sustained contributions across several outlets important for social and political sciences.

Best Publications

  • Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement?

    Magdalena E. Wojcieszak;Diana C. Mutz

  • ‘Don’t talk to me’: effects of ideologically homogeneous online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties on extremism

    Magdalena Wojcieszak

  • Online versus face-to-face deliberation: Who? Why? What? With what effects?:

    Young Min Baek;Magdalena Wojcieszak;Michael X. Delli Carpini

  • Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on Facebook

    Unknown

  • How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign?

    Unknown

  • Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing

    Unknown

  • “Carrying Online Participation Offline”-Mobilization by Radical Online Groups and Politically Dissimilar Offline Ties

    Magdalena Wojcieszak

  • Participation, Representation and Expertise: Citizen Preferences for Political Decision‐Making Processes

    Joan Font;Magdalena Wojcieszak;Clemente J. Navarro

  • Can Interparty Contact Reduce Affective Polarization? A Systematic Test of Different Forms of Intergroup Contact

    Magdalena Wojcieszak;Benjamin R. Warner

  • Deliberation and Attitude Polarization

    Magdalena Wojcieszak

  • Reshares on social media amplify political news but do not detectably affect beliefs or opinions

    Unknown

  • Social Identity, Selective Exposure, and Affective Polarization: How Priming National Identity Shapes Attitudes Toward Immigrants Via News Selection

    Magdalena Wojcieszak;R Kelly Garrett

  • Why Are Others So Polarized? Perceived Political Polarization and Media Use in 10 Countries

    JungHwan Yang;Hernando Rojas;Magdalena Wojcieszak;Toril Aalberg

  • Don’t Expect Too Much! Learning From Late-Night Comedy and Knowledge Item Difficulty

    Young Min Baek;Magdalena E. Wojcieszak

  • Effects of fact-checking social media vaccine misinformation on attitudes toward vaccines.

    Jingwen Zhang;Jieyu Ding Featherstone;Christopher Calabrese;Magdalena Wojcieszak

  • Partisan News and Political Participation: Exploring Mediated Relationships

    Magdalena E. Wojcieszak;Bruce Bimber;Lauren Feldman;Natalie Jomini Stroud

  • What Underlies the False Consensus Effect? How Personal Opinion and Disagreement Affect Perception of Public Opinion

    Magdalena E. Wojcieszak;Vincent Price

  • False Consensus Goes Online Impact of Ideologically Homogeneous Groups on False Consensus

    Magdalena Wojcieszak

  • Will politics be tweeted? New media use by Iranian youth in 2011

    Magdalena Wojcieszak;Briar Smith

  • Bridging the Divide or Intensifying the Conflict? How Disagreement Affects Strong Predilections about Sexual Minorities

    Magdalena Wojcieszak;Vincent Price

  • Assessing Selective Exposure in Experiments: The Implications of Different Methodological Choices

    Lauren Feldman;Natalie Jomini Stroud;Bruce Bimber;Magdalena Wojcieszak

  • How to Improve Attitudes Toward Disliked Groups: The Effects of Narrative Versus Numerical Evidence on Political Persuasion

    Magdalena Wojcieszak;Nuri Kim

  • Deliberative and Participatory Democracy? Ideological Strength and the Processes Leading from Deliberation to Political Engagement

    Magdalena E. Wojcieszak;Young Min Baek;Michael X.Delli Carpini

  • Cyber Racism: White Supremacy Online and the New Attack on Civil Rights

    Magdalena Wojcieszak

Frequent Co-Authors

Vincent Price
Vincent Price Duke University
Natalie Jomini Stroud
Natalie Jomini Stroud The University of Texas at Austin
Lauren Feldman
Lauren Feldman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Michael X. Delli Carpini
Michael X. Delli Carpini University of Pennsylvania
Hernando Rojas
Hernando Rojas University of Wisconsin–Madison
Bruce Bimber
Bruce Bimber University of California, Santa Barbara
Diana C. Mutz
Diana C. Mutz University of Pennsylvania
Claes H. de Vreese
Claes H. de Vreese University of Amsterdam
Yphtach Lelkes
Yphtach Lelkes University of Pennsylvania
Hajo G. Boomgaarden
Hajo G. Boomgaarden University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Political Science graduates have a wide array of online education and career advancement options in the USA. Many students choose to diversify their skill set by pursuing additional qualifications. For example, expanding your knowledge with an online MA in history programs can complement a Political Science background and open new teaching or research roles.

For quicker entry into the workforce or to specialize in a specific field, quick certifications are a smart choice. These certifications can boost your resume and equip you with in-demand skills, often within a matter of months.

Those looking to accelerate their career growth can explore the fastest masters degree online options. These programs are designed for efficiency and flexibility, allowing you to earn an advanced degree in less time than traditional pathways.

Cost is also an important consideration. If affordability is key, you can find the cheapest online university programs that offer recognized degrees without breaking the bank.

Whether you wish to broaden your expertise or quickly boost your credentials, there are accessible online routes to help you advance your Political Science career.

Best Scientists Citing Magdalena Wojcieszak

Trending Scientists