World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
45
Citations
16846
World Ranking
330
National Ranking
189

Diana C. Mutz publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana C. Mutz sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 128 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Diana C. Mutz D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana C. Mutz sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Andrew Carnegie Fellow
  • 2016 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Diana C. Mutz is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of social sciences, with a focus on sociology and political science. Their academic work spans subfields including political science and international relations, gender studies, communication, and economics.

Their research topics emphasize electoral systems and political participation, social and intergroup psychology, social media and politics, gender politics and representation, global trade and economics, social and cultural dynamics, and gender diversity and inequality.

Recent scholarly articles authored or co-authored by Diana C. Mutz include:

  • How Much is One American Worth? How Competition Affects Trade Preferences (2020), American Political Science Review
  • The Racialization of International Trade (2020), Political Psychology
  • Effects of Changes in Perceived Discrimination During BLM on the 2020 Presidential Election (2022), Science Advances
  • (Mis)Attributing the Causes of American Job Loss (2021), Public Opinion Quarterly

In addition, they have collaborated on works such as The Effects of Polarized Evaluations on Political Participation: Does Hating the Other Side Motivate Voters? (2023), published in Public Opinion Quarterly.

The scientist frequently co-authors with colleagues including Hye-Yon Lee, Edward D. Mansfield, Eunji Kim, Amber Hye-Yon Lee, and Chloe Ahn.

Diana C. Mutz has published in various academic venues, notably Harvard Dataverse, Public Opinion Quarterly, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, American Political Science Review, and Political Psychology.

Among their scholarly contributions are books published by Princeton University Press, with titles such as Winners and Losers (2021).

Their professional recognition includes awards and fellowships such as:

  • Andrew Carnegie Fellow (2017)
  • Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation (2016)
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2008)

Best Publications

  • Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy

    Diana Carole Mutz

  • The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation

    Diana C. Mutz

  • The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust

    Diana C. Mutz;Byron Reeves

  • Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice

    Diana C. Mutz

  • Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote.

    Diana C. Mutz

  • Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety

    Edward D. Mansfield;Diana C. Mutz

  • Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement?

    Magdalena E. Wojcieszak;Diana C. Mutz

  • Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media

    Diana C. Mutz;Paul S. Martin

  • Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes

    Diana Carole Mutz

  • The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse

    Diana C. Mutz;Jeffery J. Mondak

  • Population-Based Survey Experiments

    Diana Carole Mutz

  • Impersonal Influence

    Unknown

  • PERCEIVED IMPACT OF DEFAMATION AN EXPERIMENT ON THIRD-PERSON EFFECTS

    Jeremy Cohen;Diana Mutz;Vincent Price;Albert Gunther

  • American journalism and the decline in event‐centered reporting

    Kevin G. Barnhurst;Diana Mutz

  • Political persuasion and attitude change

    Diana C. Mutz;Richard A. Brody;Paul M. Sniderman

  • Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory

    Diana C. Mutz

  • Mass Media and the Depoliticization of Personal Experience

    Diana C. Mutz

  • Effects of "In-Your-Face" Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition

    Diana C. Mutz

  • Reading Public Opinion: The Influence of News Coverage on Perceptions of Public Sentiment

    Diana C. Mutz;Joe Soss

  • Dimensions of Sociotropic Behavior: Group-Based Judgements of Fairness and Well-Being

    Diana C. Mutz;Jeffery J. Mondak

  • THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEPTIONS OF MEDIA INFLUENCE: THIRD PERSON EFFECTS AND THE PUBLIC EXPRESSION OF OPINIONS*

    Diana C. Mutz

  • Televised Exposure to Politics: New Measures for a Fragmented Media Environment

    Susanna Dilliplane;Seth K. Goldman;Diana C. Mutz

  • Effects of Horse-Race Coverage on Campaign Coffers: Strategic Contributing in Presidential Primaries

    Diana C. Mutz

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward D. Mansfield
Edward D. Mansfield University of Pennsylvania
Robin Pemantle
Robin Pemantle University of Pennsylvania
Richard A. Brody
Richard A. Brody Stanford University
Magdalena Wojcieszak
Magdalena Wojcieszak University of California, Davis
Jeffery J. Mondak
Jeffery J. Mondak University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Paul M. Sniderman
Paul M. Sniderman Stanford University
Ani Nenkova
Ani Nenkova Adobe Systems (United States)
Vincent Price
Vincent Price Duke University
Clifford Nass
Clifford Nass Stanford University
Byron Reeves
Byron Reeves Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens up numerous opportunities for pursuing related online degrees and diverse career paths. Many prospective students explore interdisciplinary options that allow them to blend political science with other subjects. If you’re interested in flexibility and breadth, an interdisciplinary studies online degree may be an attractive path. This type of degree can help you gain versatile skills for roles in public policy, government, and non-profit sectors.

Students with a passion for history often wonder how their political science skills may translate. Understanding how long does it take to get a history degree can help you plan for complementary studies or dual degrees, expanding your analytical expertise.

For those pursuing advanced education, there are excellent opportunities to obtain an online MA in history programs. These provide a deeper understanding of historical contexts relevant to political dynamics.

Alternatively, if you’re drawn to information management or policy research, exploring the best online library science programs can help pave the way for academic, government, or research administration careers.

Best Scientists Citing Diana C. Mutz

Trending Scientists