World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7762 7243 4168 3789 96 10142

John C. Brigham publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John C. Brigham between 1954 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John C. Brigham published across 72 years, from 1954 to 2025, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2024. 22 of the 195 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1954 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2024. 1954: 1 publication 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 3 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 3 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 5 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 8 publications
1954 2025

195 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John C. Brigham: publications per year, 1954 to 2025
Year Publications
1954 1
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 1
1968 0
1969 1
1970 1
1971 1
1972 3
1973 1
1974 3
1975 0
1976 5
1977 2
1978 1
1979 2
1980 3
1981 0
1982 5
1983 5
1984 0
1985 7
1986 3
1987 5
1988 2
1989 3
1990 3
1991 1
1992 4
1993 2
1994 4
1995 0
1996 3
1997 3
1998 3
1999 5
2000 1
2001 3
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 1
2006 1
2007 3
2008 3
2009 1
2010 5
2011 2
2012 7
2013 9
2014 8
2015 6
2016 6
2017 3
2018 4
2019 3
2020 5
2021 4
2022 4
2023 7
2024 14
2025 8
Total 195
Download as CSV

John C. Brigham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Brigham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 96 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 96
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John C. Brigham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Brigham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1982 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

John C. Brigham is affiliated with Florida State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of engineering, with a focus on civil and structural engineering, mechanics of materials, mechanical engineering, computational mechanics, and ocean engineering. Their research spans a diverse range of subfields and topics, emphasizing numerical methods and applied mechanics.

Their recent publications include:

  • A Computationally Efficient Approach for Estimation of Tissue Material Parameters from Clinical Imaging Data Using a Level Set Method (2024), Journal of Engineering Mechanics
  • An efficient static solver for the lattice discrete particle model (2024), Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
  • Efficient global sensitivity analysis of structural vibration for a nuclear reactor system subject to nonstationary loading (2020), Nuclear Engineering and Design
  • Coupled lattice discrete particle model for the simulation of water and chloride transport in cracked concrete members (2024), Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
  • Torsional repair of damaged single-box multi-cell composite box-girder with corrugated steel webs using CFRP. Part Ⅰ: Experimental investigation (2022), Composite Structures

Frequent coauthors collaborating with John C. Brigham include:

  • Alessandro Fascetti
  • Eilis Rosenbaum
  • Julie M. Vandenbossche
  • Anthony T. Iannacchione
  • Amin Pourasghar

John C. Brigham's work has been published in several journals and venues multiple times, notably:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Energy and Buildings
  • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
  • Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
  • Composite Structures

The scientist's research interests cover a variety of specialized topics, including:

  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
  • Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
  • Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments

John C. Brigham has contributed to academic books, including a publication with New York University Press eBooks titled The Constitution of Interests, published in 2020.

In recognition of their professional contributions, they were named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1982.

Best Publications

  • Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review

    Christian A. Meissner;John C. Brigham

  • Intergroup Contact: Introduction

    Walter G. Stephan;John C. Brigham

  • Condemning and condoning racism: A social context approach to interracial settings.

    Fletcher A. Blanchard;Christian S. Crandall;John C. Brigham;Leigh Ann Vaughn

  • College Students’ Racial Attitudes

    John C. Brigham

  • Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited.

    Robert K. Bothwell;Kenneth A. Deffenbacher;John C. Brigham

  • Cross-Racial Identification

    Robert K. Bothwell;John C. Brigham;Roy S. Malpass

  • Accuracy of eyewitness identification in a field setting.

    John C. Brigham;Anne Maass;Larry D. Snyder;Kenneth Spaulding

  • The Role of Experience and Contact in the Recognition of Faces Of Own- and Other-Race Persons

    John C. Brigham;Roy S. Malpass

  • A meta-analysis of the verbal overshadowing effect in face identification

    Christian A. Meissner;John C. Brigham

  • Do “They all look alike?” The Effect of Race, Sex, Experience, and Attitudes on the Ability to Recognize Faces1

    John C. Brigham;Paul Barkowitz

  • Memory for own- and other-race faces: A dual-process approach

    Christian A. Meissner;John C. Brigham;David A. Butz

  • Social and Cognitive Factors Affecting the Own-Race Bias in Whites

    Ashlyn E. Slone;John C. Brigham;Christian A. Meissner

  • The influence of retrieval processes in verbal overshadowing.

    Christian A. Meissner;John C. Brigham;Colleen M. Kelley

  • The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications

    John C. Brigham;Robert K. Bothwell

  • The usefulness of the criteria-based content analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations: A critical review.

    C. L. Ruby;John C. Brigham

  • Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.

    John C. Brigham;Melissa P. WolfsKeil

  • The Influence of Race on Eyewitness Memory

    John C. Brigham;L. Brooke Bennett;Christian A. Meissner;Tara L. Mitchell

  • The effect of training in Criteria-Based Content Analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults

    Kristine L. Landry;John C. Brigham

  • Relationship between accuracy of prior description and facial recognition.

    Melissa Pigott;John C. Brigham

  • Accuracy of Eyewitness Identifications in a Field Setting

    John C. Brigham;Anne Maass;Larry D. Snyder;Kenneth Spaulding

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian A. Meissner
Christian A. Meissner Iowa State University
Anne Maass
Anne Maass University of Padua
Roy S. Malpass
Roy S. Malpass The University of Texas at El Paso
Christian S. Crandall
Christian S. Crandall University of Kansas
Stephen G. West
Stephen G. West Arizona State University
Walter G. Stephan
Walter G. Stephan New Mexico State University
Thomas Grisso
Thomas Grisso University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Saul M. Kassin
Saul M. Kassin John Jay College of Criminal Justice

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology can open doors to a range of rewarding career pathways, including social work, counseling, education, and mental health services. Each state in the USA sets its own educational requirements for professional roles like social workers. For example, the Arkansas minimum degree requirement for social workers is typically a Bachelor’s in Social Work (BSW), while some positions may require a Master’s degree.

In California, aspiring social workers should be aware of the specific degree needed to be a social worker in California, which often includes a graduate degree for clinical roles. Similarly, the Colorado minimum degree requirement for social workers may vary depending on whether you seek a generalist or specialized license.

If you’re considering Connecticut, the social worker degree requirements in Connecticut highlight the importance of holding accredited degrees and, in some cases, completing supervised clinical experience. Online degrees can offer flexible options to meet these varied state requirements while preparing you for meaningful roles in the growing field of mental health and community advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Brigham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles