World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
10040
World Ranking
8220
National Ranking
3523

Linda Wilbrecht publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Wilbrecht sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 81 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Linda Wilbrecht D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Wilbrecht sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Linda Wilbrecht is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research spans several fields within neuroscience and psychology, with a particular focus on the intersections of cognitive and behavioral neuroscience.

The main fields of study for Wilbrecht include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Their work covers subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology

Wilbrecht's research engages with several key topics, including:

  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Child and Animal Learning Development

Recent notable publications include:

  • "What do reinforcement learning models measure? Interpreting model parameters in cognition and neuroscience," 2021, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • "The interpretation of computational model parameters depends on the context," 2022, eLife
  • "Coming of age in the frontal cortex: The role of puberty in cortical maturation," 2021, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • "Explaining dopamine through prediction errors and beyond," 2024, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Transient food insecurity during the juvenile-adolescent period affects adult weight, cognitive flexibility, and dopamine neurobiology," 2022, Current Biology

Frequent collaborators for Wilbrecht include:

  • Anne Collins
  • Wan Chen Lin
  • Maria K. Eckstein
  • Kristen Delevich
  • Lung-Hao Tai

Wilbrecht's work is commonly published in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS Computational Biology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Transient and Persistent Dendritic Spines in the Neocortex In Vivo

    Anthony J.G.D. Holtmaat;Joshua T. Trachtenberg;Linda Wilbrecht;Gordon M. Shepherd

  • Long-term, high-resolution imaging in the mouse neocortex through a chronic cranial window

    Anthony Holtmaat;Anthony Holtmaat;Tobias Bonhoeffer;David K Chow;Jyoti Chuckowree

  • Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective

    Ronald E. Dahl;Nicholas B. Allen;Linda Wilbrecht;Ahna Ballonoff Suleiman

  • Experience-dependent and cell-type-specific spine growth in the neocortex.

    Anthony Holtmaat;Linda Wilbrecht;Graham W. Knott;Egbert Welker

  • Spine growth precedes synapse formation in the adult neocortex in vivo.

    Graham W Knott;Anthony Holtmaat;Linda Wilbrecht;Egbert Welker

  • Cell Type-Specific Structural Plasticity of Axonal Branches and Boutons in the Adult Neocortex

    Vincenzo De Paola;Anthony Holtmaat;Graham Knott;Sen Song

  • Transient stimulation of distinct subpopulations of striatal neurons mimics changes in action value

    Lung-Hao Tai;A Moses Lee;Nora Benavidez;Antonello Bonci;Antonello Bonci;Antonello Bonci

  • Cell-Type-Specific Control of Brainstem Locomotor Circuits by Basal Ganglia

    Thomas K. Roseberry;Thomas K. Roseberry;A. Moses Lee;A. Moses Lee;Arnaud L. Lalive;Linda Wilbrecht

  • Identification of a Brainstem Circuit Regulating Visual Cortical State in Parallel with Locomotion

    A. Moses Lee;A. Moses Lee;Jennifer L. Hoy;Antonello Bonci;Antonello Bonci;Linda Wilbrecht

  • Nucleus Accumbens Medium Spiny Neurons Target Non-Dopaminergic Neurons in the Ventral Tegmental Area

    Yanfang Xia;Joseph R. Driscoll;Linda Wilbrecht;Elyssa B. Margolis

  • A basal ganglia circuit for evaluating action outcomes

    Marcus Stephenson-Jones;Kai Yu;Sandra Ahrens;Jason M. Tucciarone;Jason M. Tucciarone

  • Does puberty mark a transition in sensitive periods for plasticity in the associative neocortex

    David J. Piekarski;Carolyn M. Johnson;Josiah R. Boivin;A. Wren Thomas

  • Imaging striatal dopamine release using a nongenetically encoded near infrared fluorescent catecholamine nanosensor.

    Abraham G. Beyene;Kristen Delevich;Kristen Delevich;Jackson Travis Del Bonis-O’Donnell;David J. Piekarski

  • Structural Plasticity Underlies Experience-Dependent Functional Plasticity of Cortical Circuits

    Linda Wilbrecht;Anthony Holtmaat;Nicholas Fraser Wright;Kevin Dyson Fox

  • Ovarian Hormones Organize the Maturation of Inhibitory Neurotransmission in the Frontal Cortex at Puberty Onset in Female Mice

    David J. Piekarski;Josiah R. Boivin;Linda Wilbrecht;Linda Wilbrecht

  • Juvenile mice show greater flexibility in multiple choice reversal learning than adults.

    Carolyn Johnson;Linda Wilbrecht

  • The role of the entorhinal cortex in two forms of spatial learning and memory

    D. M. Bannerman;B. K. Yee;M. Lemaire;L. Wilbrecht

  • Vocal learning in birds and humans.

    Linda Wilbrecht;Fernando Nottebohm

  • Cocaine-induced structural plasticity in frontal cortex correlates with conditioned place preference

    Francisco Javier Muñoz-Cuevas;Jegath Athilingam;Denise Piscopo;Denise Piscopo;Linda Wilbrecht;Linda Wilbrecht

  • What do reinforcement learning models measure? Interpreting model parameters in cognition and neuroscience

    Maria K Eckstein;Linda Wilbrecht;Linda Wilbrecht;Anne Ge Collins;Anne Ge Collins

  • The BDNF valine 68 to methionine polymorphism increases compulsive alcohol drinking in mice that is reversed by tropomyosin receptor kinase B activation

    Vincent Warnault;Emmanuel Darcq;Nadege Morisot;Khanhky Phamluong

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald E. Dahl
Ronald E. Dahl University of California, Berkeley
Anthony Holtmaat
Anthony Holtmaat University of Geneva
Karel Svoboda
Karel Svoboda Allen Institute
Graham Knott
Graham Knott École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Antonello Bonci
Antonello Bonci National Institute on Drug Abuse
Fernando Nottebohm
Fernando Nottebohm Rockefeller University
Dorit Ron
Dorit Ron University of California, San Francisco
Joshua T. Trachtenberg
Joshua T. Trachtenberg University of California, Los Angeles
Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel
Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel University College London
Silvia A. Bunge
Silvia A. Bunge University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Linda Wilbrecht

Trending Scientists