World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
54
Citations
8653
World Ranking
4984
National Ranking
138

Sandra Rees publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra Rees sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 176 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sandra Rees D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra Rees sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sandra Rees is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. The research conducted centers on detailed studies within the mammalian cerebral cortex, highlighting a focus on neuroanatomy and neurostructural analysis.

Their publication record includes the paper titled Ultrastructural studies of the mammalian cerebral cortex, published in 2021. This work appeared in OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) at La Trobe University.

The venues where this research has been disseminated include:

  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

Recent publications have primarily concentrated on ultrastructural investigations, contributing to the body of knowledge in cerebral cortex anatomy. No frequent co-authors or collaborative publishing patterns have been recorded.

No books or monographs have been listed under this researcher's name. The focus remains on detailed article-based contributions rather than extended-format publications.

Best Publications

  • Fetal and neonatal origins of altered brain development.

    Sandra Rees;Terrie Inder

  • bcl-2 transgene expression can protect neurons against developmental and induced cell death.

    Peter G. Farlie;Ralf Dringen;Sandra M. Rees;George Kannourakis

  • White matter injury after repeated endotoxin exposure in the preterm ovine fetus.

    Jhodie Duncan;Megan L Cock;Jean-Pierre Y Scheerlinck;Kerryn T Westcott

  • The biological basis of injury and neuroprotection in the fetal and neonatal brain.

    Sandra Rees;Richard Harding;David Walker

  • Programming effects of short prenatal exposure to cortisol

    Miodrag Dodic;Vicky Hantzis;Jhodie Duncan;Sandra Rees

  • Reduced number of neurons in the hippocampus and the cerebellum in the postnatal guinea-pig following intrauterine growth-restriction.

    C Mallard;M Loeliger;D Copolov;S Rees

  • Effects of Chronic Placental Insufficiency on Brain Development in Fetal Sheep

    EC Mallard;S Rees;M Stringer;ML Cock

  • An adverse intrauterine environment: implications for injury and altered development of the brain.

    Sandra M Rees;Richard Harding;David William Walker

  • Morphology of parallel fibres in the cerebellar cortex of the rat: an experimental light and electron microscopic study with biocytin.

    C. Pichitpornchai;J. A. Rawson;S. Rees

  • The locations of mitochondria in mammalian photoreceptors: Relation to retinal vasculature

    Jonathan Stone;Diana van Driel;Krisztina Valter;Sandra Rees

  • Early postnatal stress confers enduring vulnerability to limbic epileptogenesis.

    Michael Salzberg;Michael Salzberg;Gaurav Kumar;Laureen Supit;Nigel C. Jones

  • Microstructural Changes of the Baboon Cerebral Cortex during Gestational Development Reflected in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diffusion Anisotropy

    Christopher D. Kroenke;David C. Van Essen;Terrie E. Inder;Sandra Rees

  • Brain development during fetal life: influences of the intra-uterine environment.

    Sandra M Rees;Richard Harding

  • Prolonged reductions in placental blood flow and cerebral oxygen delivery in preterm fetal sheep exposed to endotoxin: possible factors in white matter injury after acute infection.

    Penny Dalitz;Richard Harding;Richard Harding;Sandra M Rees;Sandra M Rees;Megan L Cock;Megan L Cock

  • Fetal Brain Injury Following Prolonged Hypoxemia and Placental Insufficiency: A Review

    Sandra Rees;C Mallard;Sibilah Breen;M Stringer

  • Differential sensitivity of motor and sensory fibres in human ulnar nerve

    Unknown

  • Hypoxemia near mid-gestation has long-term effects on fetal brain development.

    S. Rees;S. Breen;M. Loeliger;G. McCrabb

  • The vulnerability of the fetal sheep brain to hypoxemia at mid-gestation

    Sandra Rees;M Stringer;Y Just;Stuart B Hooper

  • Hypometabolism precedes limbic atrophy and spontaneous recurrent seizures in a rat model of TLE.

    Bianca Jupp;John Williams;David Binns;Rodney J Hicks

  • Intrauterine growth restriction affects the maturation of myelin

    Mary Tolcos;Elizabeth Bateman;Rachael O'Dowd;Rachel Markwick

  • An animal model of chronic placental insufficiency: relevance to neurodevelopmental disorders including schizophrenia.

    A.E. Rehn;M. Van Den Buuse;M. Van Den Buuse;D. Copolov;T. Briscoe

  • Dendritic morphology is altered in hippocampal neurons following prenatal compromise.

    Sandra Dieni;Sandra Rees

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Harding
Richard Harding King's College London
Terrie E. Inder
Terrie E. Inder Brigham and Women's Hospital
Terence J. O'Brien
Terence J. O'Brien Monash University
Nigel C. Jones
Nigel C. Jones Monash University
Carina Mallard
Carina Mallard University of Gothenburg
Roscoe O. Brady
Roscoe O. Brady Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Jeffrey J. Neil
Jeffrey J. Neil Washington University in St. Louis
Deanne K. Thompson
Deanne K. Thompson Murdoch Children's Research Institute
Gary F. Egan
Gary F. Egan Monash University
Lex W. Doyle
Lex W. Doyle University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Sandra Rees

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles