World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 54 4984 4580 138 130 176 8653

Sandra Rees publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sandra Rees between 1969 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sandra Rees published across 51 years, from 1969 to 2019, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2004. 2 of the 176 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2004. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 7 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication
1969 2019

176 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sandra Rees: publications per year, 1969 to 2019
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 3
1974 0
1975 1
1976 1
1977 1
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 2
1983 1
1984 1
1985 1
1986 2
1987 0
1988 5
1989 2
1990 2
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 4
1995 4
1996 4
1997 9
1998 4
1999 9
2000 10
2001 1
2002 7
2003 9
2004 14
2005 13
2006 9
2007 5
2008 5
2009 10
2010 7
2011 7
2012 2
2013 1
2014 4
2015 1
2016 2
2017 2
2018 1
2019 1
Total 176
Download as CSV

Sandra Rees publications per year - data summary

  • Sandra Rees, a Neuroscience scholar from University of Melbourne, has 176 publications recorded across 51 years, from 1969 to 2019.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1969 and the most recent to 2019.
  • The most productive year is 2004, with 14 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1969, 1970, 1975, 1976 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 5 of the 51 years in the span carry no publications at all (1971, 1972, 1974, 1979 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.8 per year counting only the 46 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2015-2019) hold 7 publications, 4% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1969-1985: 16 publications (0.9 per year); 1986-2002: 67 publications (3.9 per year); 2003-2019: 93 publications (5.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Sandra Rees publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra Rees sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 176 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383 176
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Sandra Rees publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 38–47 to 887+ publications.
  • Sandra Rees, a Neuroscience scholar from University of Melbourne, records 176 publications - the 54th percentile of the discipline.
  • 54% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Sandra Rees, and about 46% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 158–167 publications range, and Sandra Rees ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 98–107 publications, holding 539 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 76% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 248–257 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 887 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Sandra Rees D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra Rees sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392 54
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Sandra Rees D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 68 ranges running from 30–31 to 163+ D-Index.
  • Sandra Rees, a Neuroscience scholar from University of Melbourne, records 54 D-Index - the 50th percentile of the discipline.
  • 50% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Sandra Rees, and about 50% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 54–55 D-Index range, and Sandra Rees falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 46–47 D-Index, holding 512 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 65% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 62–63 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Sandra Rees is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. The research conducted centers on detailed studies within the mammalian cerebral cortex, highlighting a focus on neuroanatomy and neurostructural analysis.

Their publication record includes the paper titled Ultrastructural studies of the mammalian cerebral cortex, published in 2021. This work appeared in OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) at La Trobe University.

The venues where this research has been disseminated include:

  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

Recent publications have primarily concentrated on ultrastructural investigations, contributing to the body of knowledge in cerebral cortex anatomy. No frequent co-authors or collaborative publishing patterns have been recorded.

No books or monographs have been listed under this researcher's name. The focus remains on detailed article-based contributions rather than extended-format publications.

Best Publications

  • Fetal and neonatal origins of altered brain development.

    Sandra Rees;Terrie Inder

  • bcl-2 transgene expression can protect neurons against developmental and induced cell death.

    Peter G. Farlie;Ralf Dringen;Sandra M. Rees;George Kannourakis

  • White matter injury after repeated endotoxin exposure in the preterm ovine fetus.

    Jhodie Duncan;Megan L Cock;Jean-Pierre Y Scheerlinck;Kerryn T Westcott

  • The biological basis of injury and neuroprotection in the fetal and neonatal brain.

    Sandra Rees;Richard Harding;David Walker

  • Programming effects of short prenatal exposure to cortisol

    Miodrag Dodic;Vicky Hantzis;Jhodie Duncan;Sandra Rees

  • Reduced number of neurons in the hippocampus and the cerebellum in the postnatal guinea-pig following intrauterine growth-restriction.

    C Mallard;M Loeliger;D Copolov;S Rees

  • Effects of Chronic Placental Insufficiency on Brain Development in Fetal Sheep

    EC Mallard;S Rees;M Stringer;ML Cock

  • An adverse intrauterine environment: implications for injury and altered development of the brain.

    Sandra M Rees;Richard Harding;David William Walker

  • Morphology of parallel fibres in the cerebellar cortex of the rat: an experimental light and electron microscopic study with biocytin.

    C. Pichitpornchai;J. A. Rawson;S. Rees

  • The locations of mitochondria in mammalian photoreceptors: Relation to retinal vasculature

    Jonathan Stone;Diana van Driel;Krisztina Valter;Sandra Rees

  • Early postnatal stress confers enduring vulnerability to limbic epileptogenesis.

    Michael Salzberg;Michael Salzberg;Gaurav Kumar;Laureen Supit;Nigel C. Jones

  • Microstructural Changes of the Baboon Cerebral Cortex during Gestational Development Reflected in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diffusion Anisotropy

    Christopher D. Kroenke;David C. Van Essen;Terrie E. Inder;Sandra Rees

  • Brain development during fetal life: influences of the intra-uterine environment.

    Sandra M Rees;Richard Harding

  • Prolonged reductions in placental blood flow and cerebral oxygen delivery in preterm fetal sheep exposed to endotoxin: possible factors in white matter injury after acute infection.

    Penny Dalitz;Richard Harding;Richard Harding;Sandra M Rees;Sandra M Rees;Megan L Cock;Megan L Cock

  • Fetal Brain Injury Following Prolonged Hypoxemia and Placental Insufficiency: A Review

    Sandra Rees;C Mallard;Sibilah Breen;M Stringer

  • Differential sensitivity of motor and sensory fibres in human ulnar nerve

    Unknown

  • Hypoxemia near mid-gestation has long-term effects on fetal brain development.

    S. Rees;S. Breen;M. Loeliger;G. McCrabb

  • The vulnerability of the fetal sheep brain to hypoxemia at mid-gestation

    Sandra Rees;M Stringer;Y Just;Stuart B Hooper

  • Hypometabolism precedes limbic atrophy and spontaneous recurrent seizures in a rat model of TLE.

    Bianca Jupp;John Williams;David Binns;Rodney J Hicks

  • Intrauterine growth restriction affects the maturation of myelin

    Mary Tolcos;Elizabeth Bateman;Rachael O'Dowd;Rachel Markwick

  • An animal model of chronic placental insufficiency: relevance to neurodevelopmental disorders including schizophrenia.

    A.E. Rehn;M. Van Den Buuse;M. Van Den Buuse;D. Copolov;T. Briscoe

  • Dendritic morphology is altered in hippocampal neurons following prenatal compromise.

    Sandra Dieni;Sandra Rees

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Harding
Richard Harding King's College London
Terrie E. Inder
Terrie E. Inder Brigham and Women's Hospital
Terence J. O'Brien
Terence J. O'Brien Monash University
Nigel C. Jones
Nigel C. Jones Monash University
Carina Mallard
Carina Mallard University of Gothenburg
Roscoe O. Brady
Roscoe O. Brady Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Jeffrey J. Neil
Jeffrey J. Neil Washington University in St. Louis
Deanne K. Thompson
Deanne K. Thompson Murdoch Children's Research Institute
Gary F. Egan
Gary F. Egan Monash University
Lex W. Doyle
Lex W. Doyle University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Sandra Rees

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles