World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
6397
World Ranking
4807
National Ranking
2277

Ann Scheck McAlearney publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Scheck McAlearney sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 261 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Ann Scheck McAlearney D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Scheck McAlearney sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ann Scheck McAlearney is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research contributions encompass the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with a strong focus on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology, Epidemiology, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their work covers various key topics, including:

  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by Ann Scheck McAlearney are:

  • "Telehealth challenges during COVID-19 as reported by primary healthcare physicians in Quebec and Massachusetts" (2021), BMC Family Practice
  • "The HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-term SM) Communities Study: Protocol for a cluster randomized trial at the community level to reduce opioid overdose deaths through implementation of an integrated set of evidence-based practices" (2020), Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • "Differences in Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Among Women Residing in Urban and Rural Communities in the United States" (2021), JAMA Network Open
  • "Model and approach for assessing implementation context and fidelity in the HEALing Communities Study" (2020), Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • "Community-Based Cluster-Randomized Trial to Reduce Opioid Overdose Deaths" (2024), New England Journal of Medicine

Their co-authors frequently include:

  • Sarah R. MacEwan
  • Daniel M. Walker
  • Laura J. Rush
  • Alice A. Gaughan
  • Matthew J. DePuccio

Ann Scheck McAlearney has published extensively in several academic venues. The most frequent journals include:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Supportive Care in Cancer
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • American Journal of Infection Control

In addition to articles, the scientist has contributed to book publications, such as one with Emerald Publishing Limited titled "The Contributions of Health Care Management to Grand Health Care Challenges" published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Leadership development in healthcare: a qualitative study

    Ann Scheck McAlearney

  • System for monitoring and managing the health care of a patient population

    Mark Trusheim;Ann McAlearney;Timothy Melkus;J. Michael Yager

  • Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study.

    Ann Scheck McAlearney;Sharon B Schweikhart;Mitchell A Medow

  • Exploring the Digital Divide: Age and Race Disparities in Use of an Inpatient Portal.

    Daniel M. Walker;Jennifer L. Hefner;Naleef Fareed;Timothy R. Huerta

  • Recruitment of minority and underserved populations in the United States: the Centers for Population Health and Health Disparities experience.

    Electra D. Paskett;Katherine W. Reeves;John M. McLaughlin;Mira L. Katz

  • Using leadership development programs to improve quality and efficiency in healthcare.

    Ann Scheck McAlearney

  • Telehealth challenges during COVID-19 as reported by primary healthcare physicians in Quebec and Massachusetts.

    Mylaine Breton;Erin E. Sullivan;Erin E. Sullivan;Nadia Deville-Stoetzel;Danielle McKinstry

  • Developing effective physician leaders: changing cultures and transforming organizations.

    Ann Scheck McAlearney;David Fisher;Karen Heiser;Darryl Robbins

  • The HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-term SM) Communities Study: Protocol for a cluster randomized trial at the community level to reduce opioid overdose deaths through implementation of an integrated set of evidence-based practices

    Sharon L. Walsh;Nabila El-Bassel;Rebecca D. Jackson;Jeffrey H. Samet;Jeffrey H. Samet

  • Randomized Trial of an Intervention to Improve Mammography Utilization Among a Triracial Rural Population of Women

    Electra Paskett;Cathy Tatum;Julia Rushing;Robert Michielutte

  • Odds of talking to healthcare providers as the initial source of healthcare information: updated cross-sectional results from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

    Christine M. Swoboda;Joseph M. Van Hulle;Ann Scheck McAlearney;Timothy R. Huerta

  • High-performance work systems in health care management, part 1: development of an evidence-informed model.

    Andrew N. Garman;Ann Scheck McAlearney;Michael I. Harrison;Paula H. Song

  • The Role of Cognitive and Learning Theories in Supporting Successful EHR System Implementation Training: A Qualitative Study

    Ann Scheck McAlearney;Ann Scheck McAlearney;Julie Robbins;Nina Kowalczyk;Deena J. Chisolm;Deena J. Chisolm

  • Health Information Technology (HIT) Adaptation: Refocusing on the Journey to Successful HIT Implementation

    Po-Yin Yen;Ann Scheck McAlearney;Cynthia J Sieck;Jennifer L Hefner

  • The influence of organizational factors on patient safety: Examining successful handoffs in health care.

    Jason P. Richter;Ann Scheck McAlearney;Michael L. Pennell

  • The journey through grief: insights from a qualitative study of electronic health record implementation.

    Ann Scheck McAlearney;Jennifer L Hefner;Cynthia J Sieck;Timothy R Huerta

  • Racial differences in colorectal cancer screening practices and knowledge within a low-income population.

    Ann Scheck McAlearney;Katherine W. Reeves;Stephanie L. Dickinson;Kimberly M. Kelly

  • Evaluating the Effect of Safety Culture on Error Reporting: A Comparison of Managerial and Staff Perspectives

    Jason P. Richter;Ann Scheck McAlearney;Michael L. Pennell

  • High-performance work systems in health care management, part 2: qualitative evidence from five case studies.

    Ann Scheck McAlearney;Andrew N. Garman;Paula H. Song;Megan McHugh

  • The story behind the story: physician skepticism about relying on clinical information technologies to reduce medical errors.

    Ann Scheck McAlearney;Deena J. Chisolm;Sharon B. Schweikhart;Mitchell A. Medow

  • The Rules of Engagement: Perspectives on Secure Messaging From Experienced Ambulatory Patient Portal Users.

    Cynthia J Sieck;Jennifer L Hefner;Jeanette Schnierle;Hannah Florian

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy M. Pawlik
Timothy M. Pawlik The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Bryan J. Weiner
Bryan J. Weiner University of Washington
Louisa Gilbert
Louisa Gilbert Columbia University
Hannah K. Knudsen
Hannah K. Knudsen University of Kentucky
Carrie B. Oser
Carrie B. Oser University of Kentucky
Aimee N. C. Campbell
Aimee N. C. Campbell Columbia University Medical Center
Nir Menachemi
Nir Menachemi Indiana University
Jeffrey H. Samet
Jeffrey H. Samet Boston University
Carol Estwing Ferrans
Carol Estwing Ferrans University of Illinois at Chicago
Frances R. Levin
Frances R. Levin Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities have flexible options to advance their education and careers through accredited online programs. Flexible formats and accelerated timelines make it easier than ever to balance studies with work and personal commitments.

For those aiming to work in social work, a range of msw online programs offer affordability and flexibility. Many universities now also provide 1 year msw programs online no bsw required, helping students quickly advance without prior degrees in social work.

Aspiring behavior analysts can access quality training remotely through bcba school online, which prepares graduates for certification and diverse roles in clinical or educational settings.

Psychology is another popular pathway, and students seeking rapid advancement are increasingly choosing the fastest online psychology degree options. These programs appeal to motivated learners ready to launch or elevate careers in counseling, mental health, research, and related fields.

With career-ready online degrees available, pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities transforms from an ambition into an accessible, achievable goal.

Best Scientists Citing Ann Scheck McAlearney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles