World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
73
Citations
18202
World Ranking
2212
National Ranking
1051

Jeffrey J. Neil publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey J. Neil sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 183 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jeffrey J. Neil D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey J. Neil sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Longitudinal Analysis of Neural Network Development in Preterm Infants

    Christopher D. Smyser;Terrie E. Inder;Joshua S. Shimony;Jason E. Hill

  • Similar patterns of cortical expansion during human development and evolution

    Jason Hill;Terrie Inder;Jeffrey Neil;Donna Dierker

  • Normal brain in human newborns: apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion anisotropy measured by using diffusion tensor MR imaging.

    J. J. Neil;S. I. Shiran;R. C. Mckinstry;G. L. Schefft

  • Neonatal intensive care unit stress is associated with brain development in preterm infants.

    Gillian C. Smith;Jordan Gutovich;Christopher Smyser;Roberta Pineda

  • Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of gray and white matter development during normal human brain maturation.

    Pratik Mukherjee;Jeffrey H. Miller;Joshua S. Shimony;Joseph V. Philip

  • Evaluating pediatric brain tumor cellularity with diffusion-tensor imaging.

    Karen M. Gauvain;Robert C. McKinstry;Pratik Mukherjee;Arie Perry

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of normal and injured developing human brain - a technical review

    J Neil;J Miller;P Mukherjee;Petra Susan Hüppi;Petra Susan Hüppi

  • New MR Imaging Assessment Tool to Define Brain Abnormalities in Very Preterm Infants at Term

    H. Kidokoro;J. J. Neil;Terrie E. Inder

  • Radial organization of developing preterm human cerebral cortex revealed by non-invasive water diffusion anisotropy MRI.

    Robert C. McKinstry;Amit Mathur;Jeffrey H. Miller;Alpay Ozcan

  • Alterations in brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants hospitalized in different neonatal intensive care unit environments.

    Roberta G. Pineda;Jeff Neil;Donna Dierker;Christopher D. Smyser

  • Brain Injury and Altered Brain Growth in Preterm Infants: Predictors and Prognosis

    Hiroyuki Kidokoro;Peter J. Anderson;Lex W. Doyle;Lianne J. Woodward

  • A surface-based analysis of hemispheric asymmetries and folding of cerebral cortex in term-born human infants

    Jason Hill;Donna Dierker;Jeffrey Neil;Terrie Inder

  • Diffusion MRI: Precision, accuracy and flow effects

    Thomas E. Conturo;Robert C. McKinstry;Joseph A. Aronovitz;Jeffrey J. Neil

  • A prospective, longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study of brain injury in newborns.

    Robert McKinstry;J. H. Miller;Abraham Snyder;Amit Mathur

  • Evaluation of extra- and intracellular apparent diffusion in normal and globally ischemic rat brain via 19F NMR

    Timothy Q. Duong;Joseph J. H. Ackerman;Howard S. Ying;Jeffrey J. Neil

  • Diffusion imaging concepts for clinicians.

    Jeffrey J. Neil

  • Relative indices of water diffusion anisotropy are equivalent in live and formalin‐fixed mouse brains

    Shu-Wei Sun;Jeffrey J. Neil;Sheng-Kwei Song

  • Neurological Consequences of Diabetic Ketoacidosis at Initial Presentation of Type 1 Diabetes in a Prospective Cohort Study of Children

    Fergus J. Cameron;Shannon E. Scratch;Caroline Nadebaum;Elisabeth A. Northam

  • Functional connectivity MRI in infants: exploration of the functional organization of the developing brain.

    Christopher D. Smyser;Abraham Z. Snyder;Jeffrey J. Neil

  • Volpe's Neurology of the Newborn

    Joseph J. Volpe;Terrie E. Inder;Basil T. Darras;Linda S. de Vries

Frequent Co-Authors

Terrie E. Inder
Terrie E. Inder Brigham and Women's Hospital
Joseph J. H. Ackerman
Joseph J. H. Ackerman Washington University in St. Louis
Christopher D. Smyser
Christopher D. Smyser Washington University in St. Louis
Christopher D. Kroenke
Christopher D. Kroenke Oregon National Primate Research Center
Joshua S. Shimony
Joshua S. Shimony Washington University in St. Louis
Lex W. Doyle
Lex W. Doyle University of Melbourne
Peter J. Anderson
Peter J. Anderson Monash University
Abraham Z. Snyder
Abraham Z. Snyder Washington University in St. Louis
David C. Van Essen
David C. Van Essen Washington University in St. Louis
Deanne K. Thompson
Deanne K. Thompson Murdoch Children's Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in neuroscience often sparks interest in flexible and practical study options. For students eager to complete their education quickly, accelerated bachelor's degree online programs can be an excellent option, allowing you to start your professional journey sooner.

If salary outcomes matter, it's helpful to explore the top degrees in the world. Many interdisciplinary fields related to neuroscience—like engineering, computer science, or health sciences—are consistently ranked for high earning potential.

Students often seek majors that provide a balance between academic rigor and job prospects. For those seeking straightforward entry points with substantial rewards, reviewing easiest college majors with high pay can help guide your choices.

Financing your studies is another important factor. Many online colleges that offer financial aid can make pursuing a neuroscience-related degree more affordable without compromising on quality.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey J. Neil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles