What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Volcano
- Mathematics
- Plate tectonics
His primary areas of study are Seismology, Geodesy, Synthetic aperture radar, Remote sensing and Geodetic datum.
His Seismology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Discontinuity and Crust.
Geodesy and Interferometric synthetic aperture radar are frequently intertwined in his study.
In his research on the topic of Interferometric synthetic aperture radar, Seismic cycle is strongly related with Aftershock.
His studies deal with areas such as Subduction and Seismic gap as well as Synthetic aperture radar.
His work in the fields of Remote sensing, such as Digital elevation model, overlaps with other areas such as Pixel, Radar engineering details, Ground-penetrating radar and Radar horizon.
His most cited work include:
- Radar interferometry and its application to changes in the Earth's surface (1761 citations)
- The displacement field of the Landers earthquake mapped by radar interferometry (1498 citations)
- Intrusion triggering of the 2010 Eyjafjallajokull explosive eruption (294 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Kurt L. Feigl mainly focuses on Seismology, Geodesy, Interferometric synthetic aperture radar, Geodetic datum and Volcano.
His study on Induced seismicity, Tectonics and Seismotectonics is often connected to Poromechanics as part of broader study in Seismology.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Epicenter, Synthetic aperture radar, Aftershock, Fault and Shear.
His Synthetic aperture radar study is concerned with Remote sensing in general.
His research integrates issues of Glacier, Surge and Geophysics in his study of Interferometric synthetic aperture radar.
His study looks at the relationship between Geodetic datum and fields such as Rift, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.
He most often published in these fields:
- Seismology (48.87%)
- Geodesy (42.11%)
- Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (33.83%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Seismology (48.87%)
- Geothermal gradient (11.28%)
- Field (11.28%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Seismology, Geothermal gradient, Field, Interferometric synthetic aperture radar and Geodetic datum.
His work on Ground motion and Seismometer as part of general Seismology research is often related to Inverse and Poromechanics, thus linking different fields of science.
His Geothermal gradient study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Fault slip, Soil science and Effective stress.
His study connects Induced seismicity and Interferometric synthetic aperture radar.
His Volcanology study, which is part of a larger body of work in Volcano, is frequently linked to Unrest, bridging the gap between disciplines.
Kurt L. Feigl has included themes like Synthetic aperture radar and Sink in his Geodesy study.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Ground motion response to an ML 4.3 earthquake using co-located distributed acoustic sensing and seismometer arrays (32 citations)
- Geomorphic expression of rapid Holocene silicic magma reservoir growth beneath Laguna del Maule, Chile. (22 citations)
- Geothermal production and reduced seismicity: Correlation and proposed mechanism (10 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Volcano
- Mathematics
- Plate tectonics
Kurt L. Feigl mostly deals with Geothermal gradient, Field, Petrology, Seismic tomography and Seismology.
His study in Geothermal gradient is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Induced seismicity and Effective stress.
His Field research covers fields of interest such as Interferometric synthetic aperture radar, Surface deformation and Geothermal reservoir.
His Petrology research includes elements of Volcano, Silicic and Volcanism.
Kurt L. Feigl integrates Seismic tomography and Optical fiber in his research.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
