World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 37 8327 8024 311 307 235 6404

Michele Manunta publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michele Manunta between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michele Manunta published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2016. 32 of the 255 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2016. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 7 publications
1995 2025

255 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michele Manunta: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 5
2005 2
2006 3
2007 8
2008 5
2009 9
2010 4
2011 5
2012 12
2013 14
2014 12
2015 24
2016 25
2017 19
2018 10
2019 20
2020 14
2021 4
2022 11
2023 14
2024 25
2025 7
Total 255
Download as CSV

Michele Manunta publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michele Manunta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 228–237 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 235 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321 235
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Michele Manunta D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michele Manunta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312 37
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Michele Manunta is affiliated with the National Research Council (CNR) in Italy and has a significant body of work focused on engineering and earth and planetary sciences. The scientist's research spans several subfields, including aerospace engineering, geophysics, ocean engineering, atmospheric science, and areas related to management, monitoring, policy, and law.

Their research contributions heavily focus on topics related to Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) applications and techniques, with additional work in geophysical methods and applications, earthquake and tectonic studies, landslides and related hazards, cryospheric studies and observations, structural health monitoring techniques, and soil moisture and remote sensing.

Michele Manunta has authored numerous papers published in a range of specialized venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Remote Sensing
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Some recent notable papers include:

  • Satellite radar interferometry: Potential and limitations for structural assessment and monitoring (2021, Journal of Building Engineering)
  • Nation-wide mapping and classification of ground deformation phenomena through the spatial clustering of P-SBAS InSAR measurements: Italy case study (2022, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing)
  • Automatic Generation of Sentinel-1 Continental Scale DInSAR Deformation Time Series through an Extended P-SBAS Processing Pipeline in a Cloud Computing Environment (2020, Remote Sensing)
  • Comment on "Pre-Collapse Space Geodetic Observations of Critical Infrastructure: The Morandi Bridge, Genoa, Italy" by Milillo et al. (2019) (2020, Remote Sensing)
  • Comments on "Study of Systematic Bias in Measuring Surface Deformation With SAR Interferometry" (2021, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing)

Michele Manunta collaborates frequently with several co-authors. Among the most frequent are Riccardo Lanari, Manuela Bonano, Francesco Casu, Claudio De Luca, and Pasquale Striano.

Best Publications

  • A small-baseline approach for investigating deformations on full-resolution differential SAR interferograms

    R. Lanari;O. Mora;M. Manunta;J.J. Mallorqui

  • A Small Baseline DIFSAR Approach for Investigating Deformations on Full Resolution SAR Interferograms

    Ricardo Lanari;Óscar Mora Sacristan;Michele Manunta;Jordi Joan Mallorquí Franquet

  • An Overview of the Small BAseline Subset Algorithm: a DInSAR Technique for Surface Deformation Analysis

    Riccardo Lanari;Francesco Casu;Francesco Casu;Mariarosaria Manzo;Mariarosaria Manzo;Giovanni Zeni;Giovanni Zeni

  • Geometrical SAR image registration

    E. Sansosti;P. Berardino;M. Manunta;F. Serafino

  • SBAS-DInSAR Parallel Processing for Deformation Time-Series Computation

    Francesco Casu;Stefano Elefante;Pasquale Imperatore;Ivana Zinno

  • Geodetic model of the 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence inferred from InSAR and GPS data

    D. Cheloni;V. De Novellis;M. Albano;A. Antonioli

  • The Parallel SBAS Approach for Sentinel-1 Interferometric Wide Swath Deformation Time-Series Generation: Algorithm Description and Products Quality Assessment

    Michele Manunta;Claudio De Luca;Ivana Zinno;Francesco Casu

  • Enhanced landslide investigations through advanced DInSAR techniques: The Ivancich case study, Assisi, Italy

    Fabiana Calò;Francesca Ardizzone;Raffaele Castaldo;Piernicola Lollino

  • Analysis of Ground Deformation Detected Using the SBAS-DInSAR Technique in Umbria, Central Italy

    Fausto Guzzetti;Michele Manunta;Michele Manunta;Francesca Ardizzone;Antonio Pepe

  • Ground deformation and source geometry of the 24 August 2016 Amatrice earthquake (Central Italy) investigated through analytical and numerical modeling of DInSAR measurements and structural-geological data

    G. Lavecchia;R. Castaldo;R. de Nardis;V. De Novellis

  • Surface displacements associated with the L'Aquila 2009 Mw 6.3 earthquake (central Italy): New evidence from SBAS‐DInSAR time series analysis

    R. Lanari;P. Berardino;M. Bonano;F. Casu

  • An application of the SBAS-DInSAR technique for the assessment of structural damage in the city of Rome

    Stefania Arangio;Fabiana Calò;Maria Di Mauro;Manuela Bonano

  • From Previous C-Band to New X-Band SAR Systems: Assessment of the DInSAR Mapping Improvement for Deformation Time-Series Retrieval in Urban Areas

    M. Bonano;M. Manunta;A. Pepe;L. Paglia

  • Long-term ERS/ENVISAT deformation time-series generation at full spatial resolution via the extended SBAS technique

    Manuela Bonano;Michele Manunta;Maria Marsella;Riccardo Lanari

  • Two-scale surface deformation analysis using the SBAS-DInSAR technique: a case study of the city of Rome, Italy

    M. Manunta;M. Marsella;G. Zeni;M. Sciotti

  • DInSAR measurements of ground deformation by sinkholes, mining subsidence, and landslides, Ebro River, Spain

    Carmen Castañeda;Francisco Gutiérrez;Michele Manunta;Jorge P. Galve

  • An On-Demand Web Tool for the Unsupervised Retrieval of Earth’s Surface Deformation from SAR Data: The P-SBAS Service within the ESA G-POD Environment

    Claudio De Luca;Roberto Cuccu;Stefano Elefante;Ivana Zinno

  • Nation-wide mapping and classification of ground deformation phenomena through the spatial clustering of P-SBAS InSAR measurements: Italy case study

    Unknown

  • DInSAR Analysis and Analytical Modeling of Mount Etna Displacements: The December 2018 Volcano-Tectonic Crisis

    V. De Novellis;S. Atzori;C. De Luca;M. Manzo

  • The 21 August 2017 Ischia (Italy) Earthquake Source Model Inferred From Seismological, GPS, and DInSAR Measurements

    V. De Novellis;S. Carlino;R. Castaldo;A. Tramelli

  • How second generation SAR systems are impacting the analysis of ground deformation

    Eugenio Sansosti;Paolo Berardino;Manuela Bonano;Fabiana Calò

  • Large areas surface deformation analysis through a cloud computing P-SBAS approach for massive processing of DInSAR time series

    Claudio De Luca;Ivana Zinno;Michele Manunta;Riccardo Lanari

  • New insights into the 2012 Emilia (Italy) seismic sequence through advanced numerical modeling of ground deformation InSAR measurements

    P. Tizzani;R. Castaldo;G. Solaro;S. Pepe

Frequent Co-Authors

Riccardo Lanari
Riccardo Lanari National Research Council (CNR)
Francesco Casu
Francesco Casu National Research Council (CNR)
Antonio Pepe
Antonio Pepe National Research Council (CNR)
Eugenio Sansosti
Eugenio Sansosti National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Francesca Ardizzone
Francesca Ardizzone National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Fausto Guzzetti
Fausto Guzzetti Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche - CNR
Gianfranco Fornaro
Gianfranco Fornaro National Research Council (CNR)
Andrea Manconi
Andrea Manconi ETH Zurich
Paola Reichenbach
Paola Reichenbach National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Sandro Moretti
Sandro Moretti University of Florence

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a future in Engineering and Technology, there are several related online degrees and career pathways worth exploring. For those interested in combining technical skills with business acumen, a cheapest online aacsb mba can be an affordable and efficient way to expand your management and leadership abilities.

Alternatively, if your career goals include working in service-oriented industries, a hospitality management degree online can open doors in hotel, travel, and event management, emphasizing both operational and technological aspects.

Broader fields such as law and human resources also align with the organization and problem-solving skills developed in engineering programs. The best online aba-approved paralegal programs can prepare you for roles in legal support and compliance. Likewise, pursuing a masters in human resources can help you lead teams and manage workplace technology transitions.

Each of these online degrees offers flexible options for upskilling, making them smart choices for students who want diverse career opportunities related to engineering and technology.

Best Scientists Citing Michele Manunta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles