World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jan Cieciuch

Jan Cieciuch

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
10971
World Ranking
6103
National Ranking
5

Jan Cieciuch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Cieciuch sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 191 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jan Cieciuch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Cieciuch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Cieciuch is affiliated with VIZJA University in Poland and specializes primarily in psychology and social sciences, with an extensive focus on clinical and social psychology, as well as related interdisciplinary fields.

Their research spans several main topics, including:

  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Cieciuch's work covers significant subfields of study such as clinical psychology, social psychology, sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, and applied psychology.

They have published numerous articles in notable venues including:

  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • Psychiatria Polska
  • Journal of Personality
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Current Psychology

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Measuring the Refined Theory of Individual Values in 49 Cultural Groups: Psychometrics of the Revised Portrait Value Questionnaire (2021), Assessment
  • Emotion regulation strategies and psychological health across cultures. (2023), American Psychologist
  • On the relationship between valence and arousal in samples across the globe. (2022), Emotion
  • Vulnerable Isolation and Enmity Concept: Disentangling the blue and dark face of vulnerable narcissism (2021), Journal of Research in Personality
  • Anankastia or Psychoticism? Which One Is Better Suited for the Fifth Trait in the Pathological Big Five: Insight From the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits Perspective (2021), Frontiers in Psychiatry

Jan Cieciuch has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Włodzimierz Strus
  • Radosław Rogoza
  • Eldad Davidov
  • Ewa Skimina
  • Klaudia Ponikiewska

In addition to journal publications, they have contributed to the field through book publications such as:

  • Podstawowe standardy edytorskie naukowych tekstów psychologicznych w języku polskim na podstawie reguł APA 7 (2022), Wydawnictwo Liberi Libri eBooks
  • O mądrości (2025), Polish Scientific Publishers PWN

Best Publications

  • Refining the theory of basic individual values.

    Shalom H. Schwartz;Jan Cieciuch;Michele Vecchione;Eldad Davidov

  • Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research

    Eldad Davidov;Bart Meuleman;Jan Cieciuch;Peter Schmidt;Peter Schmidt

  • Personal values in human life.

    Lilach Sagiv;Sonia Roccas;Jan Cieciuch;Jan Cieciuch;Shalom H. Schwartz

  • The how and what of identity formation: Associations between identity styles and value orientations

    Michael D. Berzonsky;Jan Cieciuch;Bart Duriez;Bart Soenens

  • Basic Personal Values Underlie and Give Coherence to Political Values: A Cross National Study in 15 Countries

    Shalom H. Schwartz;Shalom H. Schwartz;Gian Vittorio Caprara;Michele Vecchione;Paul G. Bain

  • Desired emotions across cultures: A value-based account

    Maya Tamir;Shalom H. Schwartz;Jan Cieciuch;Michaela Riediger

  • The number of distinct basic values and their structure assessed by PVQ-40.

    Jan Cieciuch;Shalom H. Schwartz

  • Measuring the Refined Theory of Individual Values in 49 Cultural Groups: Psychometrics of the Revised Portrait Value Questionnaire.

    Shalom H. Schwartz;Jan Cieciuch

  • Refining the theory of basic individual values

    Schwartz Shalom;J Cieciuch;M Vecchione;E Davidov

  • The Polish adaptation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF)

    Dominika Karaś;Jan Cieciuch;Corey L.M. Keyes

  • Personal values and political activism: A cross‐national study

    Michele Vecchione;Shalom H. Schwartz;Shalom H. Schwartz;Gian Vittorio Caprara;Harald Schoen

  • Value tradeoffs propel and inhibit behavior: Validating the 19 refined values in four countries

    Shalom H. Schwartz;Shalom H. Schwartz;Jan Cieciuch;Michele Vecchione;Claudio Torres

  • The Cross-National Invariance Properties of a New Scale to Measure 19 Basic Human Values A Test Across Eight Countries

    Jan Cieciuch;Eldad Davidov;Michele Vecchione;Constanze Beierlein

  • Cross-cultural evidence of value structures and priorities in childhood

    Anna K. Döring;Shalom H. Schwartz;Jan Cieciuch;Patrick J. F. Groenen

  • The Circumplex of Personality Metatraits: A Synthesizing Model of Personality Based on the Big Five:

    Włodzimierz Strus;Jan Cieciuch;Tomasz Rowiński

  • Basic Values, Ideological Self-Placement, and Voting: A Cross-Cultural Study

    Gian Vittorio Caprara;Michele Vecchione;Shalom H. Schwartz;Harald Schoen

  • The Comparability of Measurements of Attitudes toward Immigration in the European Social Survey Exact versus Approximate Measurement Equivalence

    Eldad Davidov;Jan Cieciuch;Jan Cieciuch;Bart Meuleman;Peter Schmidt

  • The stability and change of value structure and priorities in childhood: A longitudinal study values in childhood

    Jan Cieciuch;Eldad Davidov;René Algesheimer

  • Personality correlates of party preference: The Big Five in five big European countries

    Michele Vecchione;Harald Schoen;José Luis González Castro;Jan Cieciuch

  • Applying the Refined Values Theory to Past Data What Can Researchers Gain

    Jan Cieciuch;Shalom H. Schwartz;Shalom H. Schwartz;Michele Vecchione

  • A comparison of the invariance properties of the PVQ-40 and the PVQ-21 to measure human values across German and Polish Samples

    Jan Cieciuch;Eldad Davidov

Frequent Co-Authors

Eldad Davidov
Eldad Davidov University of Cologne
Shalom H. Schwartz
Shalom H. Schwartz Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Michele Vecchione
Michele Vecchione Sapienza University of Rome
Markku Verkasalo
Markku Verkasalo University of Helsinki
Cláudio Vaz Torres
Cláudio Vaz Torres University of Brasília
Jan-Erik Lönnqvist
Jan-Erik Lönnqvist University of Helsinki
Harald Schoen
Harald Schoen University of Mannheim
Paul G. Bain
Paul G. Bain University of Bath
Alain Van Hiel
Alain Van Hiel Ghent University
Ronald Fischer
Ronald Fischer Victoria University of Wellington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens diverse professional opportunities, both online and on campus. Many students wonder, is an online psychology degree credible? Thanks to advances in distance education, reputable online psychology programs now carry significant respect among employers and accreditation bodies.

If you’re aiming for specialized roles, understanding the educational path is crucial. For example, if you're interested in criminal behavior and the legal system, you’ll want to explore what’s required for forensic psychologist education, which typically involves advanced graduate degrees.

Deciding between a ba or bs in psychology for clinical psychology is another key choice. Both can lead to graduate study, but each offers different emphases that may suit your goals.

For those looking to fast-track their careers, there are fast track psyd online programs available. These accelerated degrees allow motivated students to complete their doctorate in a reduced timeframe, preparing them quickly for clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Cieciuch

Trending Scientists