World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4303 3975 2399 2166 179 20201

Matthias R. Mehl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthias R. Mehl between 2001 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthias R. Mehl published across 26 years, from 2001 to 2026, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2020. 21 of the 239 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2020. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 20 publications 2026: 1 publication
2001 2026

239 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthias R. Mehl: publications per year, 2001 to 2026
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 3
2004 3
2005 0
2006 4
2007 6
2008 7
2009 4
2010 4
2011 11
2012 5
2013 8
2014 9
2015 5
2016 16
2017 16
2018 19
2019 14
2020 22
2021 12
2022 14
2023 14
2024 21
2025 20
2026 1
Total 239
Download as CSV

Matthias R. Mehl publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias R. Mehl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 179 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 179
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthias R. Mehl D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias R. Mehl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthias R. Mehl is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a significant number of publications in the field. The main subfields of their work include social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and artificial intelligence.

Their research covers a range of topics, including:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Mental Health via Writing
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Matthias R. Mehl has published papers in several established academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • European Journal of Personality
  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Journal of Research in Personality
  • Scientific Reports
  • PLoS ONE

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Matthias R. Mehl cover various aspects of psychology and personality research:

  • Investigating the Relationship between Resident Physician Implicit Bias and Language Use during a Clinical Encounter with Hispanic Patients, 2021, Health Communication
  • Equilibria in Personality States: A Conceptual Primer for Dynamics in Personality States, 2020, European Journal of Personality
  • Best practices for Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR) research: A practical guide to coding and processing EAR data, 2020, Behavior Research Methods
  • The think aloud paradigm reveals differences in the content, dynamics and conceptual scope of resting state thought in trait brooding, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • 'Personality in its Natural Habitat' Revisited: A Pooled, Multi-sample Examination of the Relationships between the Big Five Personality Traits and Daily Behaviour and Language Use, 2020, European Journal of Personality

Matthias R. Mehl collaborates frequently with a set of co-authors. Among the most frequent are Angelina J. Polsinelli, David A. Sbarra, Suzanne Moseley, Charles L. Raison, and Deanna M. Kaplan.

Best Publications

  • Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves.

    James W. Pennebaker;Matthias R. Mehl;Kate G. Niederhoffer

  • Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text

    François Mairesse;Marilyn A. Walker;Matthias R. Mehl;Roger K. Moore

  • Handbook of research methods for studying daily life

    Matthias R. Mehl;Tamlin S. Conner

  • Linguistic Markers of Psychological Change Surrounding September 11, 2001

    Michael A. Cohn;Matthias R. Mehl;James W. Pennebaker

  • Personality in its natural habitat: manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life.

    Matthias R. Mehl;Samuel D. Gosling;James W. Pennebaker

  • The sounds of social life: A psychometric analysis of students' daily social environments and natural conversations.

    Matthias R. Mehl;James W. Pennebaker

  • Does Posting Facebook Status Updates Increase or Decrease Loneliness? An Online Social Networking Experiment

    Fenne große Deters;Matthias R. Mehl

  • The Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR): a device for sampling naturalistic daily activities and conversations.

    Matthias R. Mehl;James W. Pennebaker;D. Michael Crow;James Dabbs

  • Knowing me, knowing you: the accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior.

    Simine Vazire;Matthias R. Mehl

  • Are women really more talkative than men

    Matthias R. Mehl;Simine Vazire;Nairán Ramírez-Esparza;Richard B. Slatcher

  • Eavesdropping on Happiness Well-Being Is Related to Having Less Small Talk and More Substantive Conversations

    Matthias R. Mehl;Simine Vazire;Shannon E. Holleran;C. Shelby Clark

  • When Leaving Your Ex, Love Yourself Observational Ratings of Self-Compassion Predict the Course of Emotional Recovery Following Marital Separation

    David A. Sbarra;Hillary L. Smith;Matthias R. Mehl

  • Prognostic Significance of Spouse We Talk in Couples Coping With Heart Failure

    Michael J. Rohrbaugh;Matthias R. Mehl;Varda Shoham;Elizabeth S. Reilly

  • Computergestützte quantitative textanalyse: Äquivalenz und robustheit der deutschen Version des Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count.

    Markus Wolf;Andrea B. Horn;Matthias R. Mehl;Severin Haug

  • Sounds like a Narcissist: Behavioral Manifestations of Narcissism in Everyday Life.

    Nicholas S. Holtzman;Simine Vazire;Matthias R. Mehl

  • The Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR): A Method for the Naturalistic Observation of Daily Social Behavior.

    Matthias R. Mehl

  • The Hispanic health paradox: From epidemiological phenomenon to contribution opportunities for psychological science:

    John M. Ruiz;Heidi A. Hamann;Matthias R. Mehl;Mary Frances O’Connor

  • Depression, negative emotionality, and self-referential language: A multi-lab, multi-measure, and multi-language-task research synthesis.

    Allison M. Tackman;David A. Sbarra;Angela L. Carey;M. Brent Donnellan

  • Hormones and personality: Testosterone as a marker of individual differences

    Jennifer Guinn Sellers;Matthias R. Mehl;Robert A. Josephs

  • Lab And/Or Field? Measuring Personality Processes and Their Social Consequences:

    Cornelia Wrzus;Matthias R. Mehl

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Sbarra
David A. Sbarra University of Arizona
James W. Pennebaker
James W. Pennebaker The University of Texas at Austin
Simine Vazire
Simine Vazire University of Melbourne
Mike Martin
Mike Martin University of Zurich
Elizabeth L. Glisky
Elizabeth L. Glisky University of Arizona
Vicki Anderson
Vicki Anderson Murdoch Children's Research Institute
M. Brent Donnellan
M. Brent Donnellan Michigan State University
Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna
Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna University of Arizona
Jessica L. Borelli
Jessica L. Borelli University of California, Irvine
Sudha Ram
Sudha Ram University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to diverse career options in counseling, research, education, and beyond. With the growing demand for mental health professionals, online psychology degrees are more popular than ever—offering flexibility and access to accredited programs across the country.

If you’re considering a counseling career, requirements often vary by location. For example, you can review Anaheim mental health counselor certification requirements to understand the specific educational and licensure steps in California. Comparing state regulations is important for those who may relocate or want to practice elsewhere. In Alaska, prospective counselors can explore the mental health counselor requirements in Anchorage to see what’s different in northern states.

Students interested in other regions might consider reading about how to become a mental health counselor in Arlington or review mental health counselor requirements in Atlanta. Understanding variations in state licensing, supervised clinical hours, and exam requirements is key to planning your career pathway.

By researching online degrees and staying informed about regional certification rules, you’ll be better prepared for a successful career in mental health counseling—or any subfield within psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias R. Mehl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles