World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
20201
World Ranking
4303
National Ranking
2399

Matthias R. Mehl publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias R. Mehl sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 179 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Matthias R. Mehl D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias R. Mehl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthias R. Mehl is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a significant number of publications in the field. The main subfields of their work include social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and artificial intelligence.

Their research covers a range of topics, including:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Mental Health via Writing
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Matthias R. Mehl has published papers in several established academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • European Journal of Personality
  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Journal of Research in Personality
  • Scientific Reports
  • PLoS ONE

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Matthias R. Mehl cover various aspects of psychology and personality research:

  • Investigating the Relationship between Resident Physician Implicit Bias and Language Use during a Clinical Encounter with Hispanic Patients, 2021, Health Communication
  • Equilibria in Personality States: A Conceptual Primer for Dynamics in Personality States, 2020, European Journal of Personality
  • Best practices for Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR) research: A practical guide to coding and processing EAR data, 2020, Behavior Research Methods
  • The think aloud paradigm reveals differences in the content, dynamics and conceptual scope of resting state thought in trait brooding, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • 'Personality in its Natural Habitat' Revisited: A Pooled, Multi-sample Examination of the Relationships between the Big Five Personality Traits and Daily Behaviour and Language Use, 2020, European Journal of Personality

Matthias R. Mehl collaborates frequently with a set of co-authors. Among the most frequent are Angelina J. Polsinelli, David A. Sbarra, Suzanne Moseley, Charles L. Raison, and Deanna M. Kaplan.

Best Publications

  • Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves.

    James W. Pennebaker;Matthias R. Mehl;Kate G. Niederhoffer

  • Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text

    François Mairesse;Marilyn A. Walker;Matthias R. Mehl;Roger K. Moore

  • Handbook of research methods for studying daily life

    Matthias R. Mehl;Tamlin S. Conner

  • Linguistic Markers of Psychological Change Surrounding September 11, 2001

    Michael A. Cohn;Matthias R. Mehl;James W. Pennebaker

  • Personality in its natural habitat: manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life.

    Matthias R. Mehl;Samuel D. Gosling;James W. Pennebaker

  • The sounds of social life: A psychometric analysis of students' daily social environments and natural conversations.

    Matthias R. Mehl;James W. Pennebaker

  • Does Posting Facebook Status Updates Increase or Decrease Loneliness? An Online Social Networking Experiment

    Fenne große Deters;Matthias R. Mehl

  • The Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR): a device for sampling naturalistic daily activities and conversations.

    Matthias R. Mehl;James W. Pennebaker;D. Michael Crow;James Dabbs

  • Knowing me, knowing you: the accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior.

    Simine Vazire;Matthias R. Mehl

  • Are women really more talkative than men

    Matthias R. Mehl;Simine Vazire;Nairán Ramírez-Esparza;Richard B. Slatcher

  • Eavesdropping on Happiness Well-Being Is Related to Having Less Small Talk and More Substantive Conversations

    Matthias R. Mehl;Simine Vazire;Shannon E. Holleran;C. Shelby Clark

  • When Leaving Your Ex, Love Yourself Observational Ratings of Self-Compassion Predict the Course of Emotional Recovery Following Marital Separation

    David A. Sbarra;Hillary L. Smith;Matthias R. Mehl

  • Prognostic Significance of Spouse We Talk in Couples Coping With Heart Failure

    Michael J. Rohrbaugh;Matthias R. Mehl;Varda Shoham;Elizabeth S. Reilly

  • Computergestützte quantitative textanalyse: Äquivalenz und robustheit der deutschen Version des Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count.

    Markus Wolf;Andrea B. Horn;Matthias R. Mehl;Severin Haug

  • Sounds like a Narcissist: Behavioral Manifestations of Narcissism in Everyday Life.

    Nicholas S. Holtzman;Simine Vazire;Matthias R. Mehl

  • The Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR): A Method for the Naturalistic Observation of Daily Social Behavior.

    Matthias R. Mehl

  • The Hispanic health paradox: From epidemiological phenomenon to contribution opportunities for psychological science:

    John M. Ruiz;Heidi A. Hamann;Matthias R. Mehl;Mary Frances O’Connor

  • Depression, negative emotionality, and self-referential language: A multi-lab, multi-measure, and multi-language-task research synthesis.

    Allison M. Tackman;David A. Sbarra;Angela L. Carey;M. Brent Donnellan

  • Hormones and personality: Testosterone as a marker of individual differences

    Jennifer Guinn Sellers;Matthias R. Mehl;Robert A. Josephs

  • Lab And/Or Field? Measuring Personality Processes and Their Social Consequences:

    Cornelia Wrzus;Matthias R. Mehl

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Sbarra
David A. Sbarra University of Arizona
James W. Pennebaker
James W. Pennebaker The University of Texas at Austin
Simine Vazire
Simine Vazire University of Melbourne
Mike Martin
Mike Martin University of Zurich
Elizabeth L. Glisky
Elizabeth L. Glisky University of Arizona
Vicki Anderson
Vicki Anderson Murdoch Children's Research Institute
M. Brent Donnellan
M. Brent Donnellan Michigan State University
Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna
Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna University of Arizona
Jessica L. Borelli
Jessica L. Borelli University of California, Irvine
Sudha Ram
Sudha Ram University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to diverse career options in counseling, research, education, and beyond. With the growing demand for mental health professionals, online psychology degrees are more popular than ever—offering flexibility and access to accredited programs across the country.

If you’re considering a counseling career, requirements often vary by location. For example, you can review Anaheim mental health counselor certification requirements to understand the specific educational and licensure steps in California. Comparing state regulations is important for those who may relocate or want to practice elsewhere. In Alaska, prospective counselors can explore the mental health counselor requirements in Anchorage to see what’s different in northern states.

Students interested in other regions might consider reading about how to become a mental health counselor in Arlington or review mental health counselor requirements in Atlanta. Understanding variations in state licensing, supervised clinical hours, and exam requirements is key to planning your career pathway.

By researching online degrees and staying informed about regional certification rules, you’ll be better prepared for a successful career in mental health counseling—or any subfield within psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias R. Mehl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles