World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
4639
World Ranking
12214
National Ranking
4957

Sastry Kompella publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sastry Kompella sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 208 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sastry Kompella D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sastry Kompella sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sastry Kompella is affiliated with the United States Naval Research Laboratory in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with a significant focus on Computer Networks and Communications as well as Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The main topics of Kompella's work include:

  • Age of Information Optimization
  • IoT Networks and Protocols
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Wireless Networks and Protocols
  • Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
  • Cooperative Communication and Network Coding
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging

Among their frequent coauthors are:

  • Y. Thomas Hou
  • Wenjing Lou
  • Chengzhang Li
  • Qingyu Liu
  • Jeffrey H. Reed

Kompella has published extensively in several venues, including the following frequent publication outlets:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  • IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
  • IEEE INFOCOM 2022 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications
  • IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems

Their recent academic papers exemplify their research focus and are listed as follows:

  • "Ao2I: Minimizing Age of Outdated Information to Improve Freshness in Data Collection," 2022, IEEE INFOCOM 2022 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications
  • "Scheduling With Age of Information Guarantee," 2022, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
  • "Age of Information Optimization in Multi-Channel Based Multi-Hop Wireless Networks," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
  • "Practical Implementation of Adaptive Threshold Energy Detection using Software Defined Radio," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems
  • "Minimizing AoI in a 5G-Based IoT Network Under Varying Channel Conditions," 2021, IEEE Internet of Things Journal

The research represented in these publications addresses key issues in data freshness, wireless network optimization, and practical implementations in software-defined radio and 5G-based IoT environments.

Best Publications

  • Age of information under random updates

    Clement Kam;Sastry Kompella;Anthony Ephremides

  • Effect of Message Transmission Path Diversity on Status Age

    Clement Kam;Sastry Kompella;Gam D. Nguyen;Anthony Ephremides

  • On the Age of Information With Packet Deadlines

    Clement Kam;Sastry Kompella;Gam D. Nguyen;Jeffrey E. Wieselthier

  • Optimal relay assignment for cooperative communications

    Yi Shi;Sushant Sharma;Y. Thomas Hou;Sastry Kompella

  • How to correctly use the protocol interference model for multi-hop wireless networks

    Yi Shi;Y. Thomas Hou;Jia Liu;Sastry Kompella

  • An optimal algorithm for relay node assignment in cooperative ad hoc networks

    Sushant Sharma;Yi Shi;Y. Thomas Hou;Sastry Kompella

  • Age-optimal updates of multiple information flows

    Yin Sun;Eiif Uysal-Biyikoglu;Sastry Kompella

  • Cooperative Communications in Multi-hop Wireless Networks: Joint Flow Routing and Relay Node Assignment

    Sushant Sharma;Yi Shi;Y. Thomas Hou;Hanif D. Sherali

  • Maximizing Capacity in Multihop Cognitive Radio Networks under the SINR Model

    Y. Shi;Y. T. Hou;S. Kompella;H. D. Sherali

  • Age of information with a packet deadline

    Clement Kam;Sastry Kompella;Gam D. Nguyen;Jeffrey E. Wieselthier

  • Effect of message transmission diversity on status age

    Clement Kam;Sastry Kompella;Anthony Ephremides

  • Towards an effective age of information: Remote estimation of a Markov source

    Clement Kam;Sastry Kompella;Gam D. Nguyen;Jeffrey E. Wieselthier

  • On path selection and rate allocation for video in wireless mesh networks

    Sastry Kompella;Shiwen Mao;Y. Thomas Hou;Hanif D. Sherali

  • On optimal SINR-based scheduling in multihop wireless networks

    Sastry Kompella;Jeffrey E. Wieselthier;Anthony Ephremides;Hanif D. Sherali

  • Age-optimal Sampling and Transmission Scheduling in Multi-Source Systems

    Ahmed M. Bedewy;Yin Sun;Sastry Kompella;Ness B. Shroff

  • Information freshness and popularity in mobile caching

    Clement Kam;Sastry Kompella;Gam D. Nguyen;Jeffrey E. Wieselthier

  • Stable throughput tradeoffs in cognitive shared channels with cooperative relaying

    Sastry Kompella;Gam D. Nguyen;Jeffrey E. Wieselthier;Anthony Ephremides

  • Squeezing the most out of interference: An optimization framework for joint interference exploitation and avoidance

    Canming Jiang;Yi Shi;Y. Thomas Hou;Wenjing Lou

  • Optimal Sampling and Scheduling for Timely Status Updates in Multi-Source Networks

    Ahmed M. Bedewy;Yin Sun;Sastry Kompella;Ness B. Shroff

  • Cross-layer optimized multipath routing for video communications in wireless networks

    S. Kompella;Shiweri Mao;Y. Thomas Hou;H.D. Sherali

  • Age of Incorrect Information for Remote Estimation of a Binary Markov Source

    Clement Kam;Sastry Kompella;Anthony Ephremides

  • Bridging the Gap between Protocol and Physical Models for Wireless Networks

    Yi Shi;Y. T. Hou;Jia Liu;S. Kompella

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony Ephremides
Anthony Ephremides University of Maryland, College Park
Yi Shi
Yi Shi Virginia Tech
Y. Thomas Hou
Y. Thomas Hou Virginia Tech
Jeffrey E. Wieselthier
Jeffrey E. Wieselthier Office of Naval Research
Wenjing Lou
Wenjing Lou Virginia Tech
Scott F. Midkiff
Scott F. Midkiff Virginia Tech
Hanif D. Sherali
Hanif D. Sherali Virginia Tech
Narayan B. Mandayam
Narayan B. Mandayam Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Shiwen Mao
Shiwen Mao Auburn University
Yin Sun
Yin Sun Auburn University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science opens up numerous opportunities, whether you're beginning your academic journey or aiming to advance your career. If you’re concerned about affordability, there are cheap online colleges offering computer science programs that combine quality with reasonable tuition.

Admissions flexibility is another key advantage. For students whose GPAs might not meet traditional thresholds, enrolling in a college with low gpa requirements can be a smart pathway to earning your degree.

Online programs can also help you fast-track your studies. Many of the computer science degree online options let you graduate sooner and enter the workforce quickly. Graduates can pursue diverse tech roles or even shift to interdisciplinary careers.

If you’re interested in broader career options, it’s worth exploring what similar disciplines can offer. For example, you can learn what can you do with an environmental science degree if you’re passionate about sustainability and technology.

With these varied pathways, finding an online degree program to fit your goals and background has never been more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Sastry Kompella

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles