World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
7780
World Ranking
8781
National Ranking
3136

James F. Gleason publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Gleason sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 100 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

James F. Gleason D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Gleason sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

James F. Gleason is affiliated with the Goddard Space Flight Center in the United States. Their research spans primarily across the fields of Medicine, with contributions also touching Aerospace Engineering, Atmospheric Science, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their work includes a variety of subfields, notably Surgery, Transplantation, and Aerospace Engineering. These areas align with the broader scope of Gleason's scholarly output, which covers topics such as Calibration and Measurement Techniques, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Atmospheric Aerosols and Clouds, Transplantation Methods and Outcomes, Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments, and Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes.

Recent publications by Gleason demonstrate an intersection of clinical and technical research. These include:

  • "Calibration of the SNPP and NOAA 20 VIIRS sensors for continuity of the MODIS climate data records," 2023, published in Remote Sensing of Environment
  • "A Transplant Recipients International Organization Initiative to Improve Education About Posttransplant Cancer Risk, Prevention, and Treatment," 2022, published in Progress in Transplantation
  • "Potential Use of Thinklogical's KVM Technology in Safety Applications," 2021, published in the 12th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2021)

Gleason has collaborated with various researchers in their work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Alexei Lyapustin
  • Yujie Wang
  • Myungje Choi
  • Xiaoxiong Xiong
  • Amit Angal

Their publications have appeared in several venues, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach:

  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Progress in Transplantation
  • 12th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2021)

Best Publications

  • Derivation of aerosol properties from satellite measurements of backscattered ultraviolet radiation: Theoretical basis

    O. Torres;P. K. Bhartia;J. R. Herman;Z. Ahmad

  • Near-real time retrieval of tropospheric NO 2 from OMI

    K. F. Boersma;K. F. Boersma;H. J. Eskes;J. P. Veefkind;E. J. Brinksma

  • An improved retrieval of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide from GOME

    Randall V. Martin;Kelly Chance;Daniel J. Jacob;Thomas P. Kurosu

  • Record Low Global Ozone in 1992

    J. F. Gleason;P. K. Bhartia;J. R. Herman;R. McPeters

  • Smoke, Clouds, and Radiation-Brazil (SCAR-B) Experiment

    Y. J. Kaufman;P. V. Hobbs;V. W. J. H. Kirchhoff;P. Artaxo

  • A new stratospheric and tropospheric NO2 retrieval algorithm for nadir-viewing satellite instruments : applications to OMI

    E. J. Bucsela;N. A. Krotkov;E. A. Celarier;E. A. Celarier;L. N. Lamsal;L. N. Lamsal

  • Algorithm for NO/sub 2/ vertical column retrieval from the ozone monitoring instrument

    E.J. Bucsela;E.A. Celarier;M.O. Wenig;J.F. Gleason

  • Detection of biomass burning smoke from TOMS measurements

    N. C. Hsu;J. R. Herman;P. K. Bhartia;C. J. Seftor

  • Anomalously low ozone over the Arctic

    Paul A. Newman;James F. Gleason;Richard D. McPeters;Richard S. Stolarski

  • Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument nitrogen dioxide columns

    E.A. Celarier;E.J. Brinksma;J.F. Gleason;J.P. Veefkind

  • Evaluation of OMI operational standard NO 2 column retrievals using in situ and surface-based NO 2 observations

    L. N. Lamsal;L. N. Lamsal;N. A. Krotkov;E. A. Celarier;E. A. Celarier;W. H. Swartz;W. H. Swartz

  • Recent large reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions from Chinese power plants observed by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument

    Can Li;Can Li;Qiang Zhang;Qiang Zhang;Nickolay A. Krotkov;Nickolay A. Krotkov;David G. Streets

  • NO2 columns in the western United States observed from space and simulated by a regional chemistry model and their implications for NOx emissions

    S.-W. Kim;S.-W. Kim;A. Heckel;A. Heckel;G.J. Frost;G.J. Frost;A. Richter

  • Satellite observations of changes in air quality during the 2008 Beijing Olympics and Paralympics

    J. C. Witte;M. R. Schoeberl;A. R. Douglass;J. F. Gleason

  • Ozone depletion at mid‐latitudes: Coupling of volcanic aerosols and temperature variability to anthropogenic chlorine

    S. Solomon;R. W. Portmann;R. R. Garcia;W. Randel

  • Comparison of tropospheric NO2 from in situ aircraft measurements with near-real-time and standard product data from OMI

    E. J. Bucsela;E. J. Bucsela;E. J. Bucsela;A. E. Perring;R. C. Cohen;K. F. Boersma

  • Validation of OMI tropospheric NO2 column densities using direct‐Sun mode Brewer measurements at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

    Mark O. Wenig;Mark O. Wenig;A. M. Cede;E. J. Bucsela;E. A. Celarier

  • Validation of OMI tropospheric NO 2 column data using MAX-DOAS measurements deep inside the North China Plain in June 2006: Mount Tai Experiment 2006

    H. Irie;Y. Kanaya;H. Akimoto;H. Tanimoto

  • Testing and improving OMI DOMINO tropospheric NO2 using observations from the DANDELIONS and INTEX-B validation campaigns

    Jennifer C. Hains;K. Folkert Boersma;Mark Kroon;Ruud J. Dirksen

  • Comparison of total ozone from the satellite instruments GOME and TOMS with measurements from the Dobson network 1996-2000

    K. Bramstedt;J. Gleason;D. Loyola;W. Thomas

  • Evaluations of NOx and highly reactive VOC emission inventories in Texas and their implications for ozone plume simulations during the Texas Air Quality Study 2006

    S. W. Kim;S. W. Kim;S. A. McKeen;S. A. McKeen;G. J. Frost;G. J. Frost;S. H. Lee;S. H. Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Wenig
Mark Wenig Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Nickolay A. Krotkov
Nickolay A. Krotkov Goddard Space Flight Center
Mark R. Schoeberl
Mark R. Schoeberl Science and Technology Corporation (United States)
Kenneth E. Pickering
Kenneth E. Pickering University of Maryland, College Park
Lok N. Lamsal
Lok N. Lamsal Goddard Space Flight Center
Richard D. McPeters
Richard D. McPeters Goddard Space Flight Center
Gregory J. Frost
Gregory J. Frost National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
John P. Burrows
John P. Burrows University of Bremen
Andreas Richter
Andreas Richter University of Bremen
Stuart A. McKeen
Stuart A. McKeen National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden your career opportunities. Many students seek programs that balance quality with flexibility, making online education an attractive option. If you’re curious about easier entry points, programs listed under what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get may offer insights into degrees that require less intensive commitment while still providing valuable knowledge applicable to environmental fields.

Geology and Earth sciences play a vital role in understanding environmental processes. Numerous universities now offer a geology degree online, allowing students to gain critical skills through flexible scheduling. This path is ideal for those passionate about studying Earth's systems and contributing to sustainable solutions.

Another expanding field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), widely used for environmental mapping and data analysis. Highly specialized gis degree programs provide expertise in spatial data management, opening doors to careers in environmental consulting, urban planning, and resource management.

For professionals aiming to impact environmental policy and organizational leadership, pursuing a Master of Public Administration can be effective. Various one year mpa programs offer accelerated tracks, enabling students to quickly enhance their management skills relevant to sustainability initiatives and public sector roles.

Best Scientists Citing James F. Gleason

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles